Missokyst
Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006 Status: offline
|
I guess I must not be "true". For me, kink is bdsm. I am a masochist, but I can take care of my own needs if it came down to it. If I loved someone, I could give up the need to be beaten. But ds.. when I am in a relationship, the mate always comes first. I cater to my mate like I do my family. It is my nature to care for my people. It is my nature to defer my wishes to what my mate requires. I do not see this as kink. I see this as personality. If I was in a relationship that developed into love, I am fairly certain that it is my personality which he would find favor with. It has nothing to do with kink. It has everything to do with the need to make your mate happy. He could be nilla and still appreciate that. And if he did not, more than likely he and I would not be together. We would not have gotten to the point of "falling in love". Kink is great. Love can be done without kink. BDSM is play. Submission is the way some people are within a relationship Now.. if I were a dominant, then the situation might be different. But then again.. if someone is with you, falling in love with you, then they accept that your personality is strong. And if you aren't tying them up and beating them, are they any less to you? If so, it is probably not love. BDSM is play. Love can be done without kink. DS is personality. Kyst quote:
ORIGINAL: Arastella My personal belief (DO NOTE, BEFORE YOU FLAME ME, ITS SIMPLY MY BELIEF) about submissives is that if you call yourself a "true submissive", then you KNOW you can't just give it up. You KNOW that if you give it up and live a "vanilla" relationship instead, there will always be something missing. And yes, I do believe if the person you found can't grasp the BDSM concept, then they aren't meant to be.
_____________________________
pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil “The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.” ― Bob Marley
|