MadRabbit
Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah In the Leather community a submissive never addresses a Master first as it is considered a insult and a socially unacceptable action. So when the lifestyle world went ONLINE people could not see the individual or see the social markers that denoted a Master or a Slave. The Upper and lower casing of Names, be it in first, second, or third person was an online way to maintain respect and show people who might not know the person if they were a dominant or a submissive. In SOME Leather communities perhaps... From my experience with meeting the Trident Knights in Charleston, I can safely say that this protocol isnt followed in the least or any protocols that really create a social heirarchy between Masters and slaves. I know some Leather folks in Columbia as well that have never mentioned this one to me in our talks about proper etiquette. In fact, as far as my experiences locally, the only socially unacceptable action I can think of in regards to formalities is not referring to someone by their earned title. This includes titles for slaves/subs as well as Masters/Doms/Tops. Outside of the High Protocol group that I was invited to join, I cant really think of anything that divides up dominants and submissives with social markers I know besides the titles and the common courtesys like asking a Master permission to hug his property. As far as the OP, its not something I place any specific focus on in regards to my own personal protocols and preferences, though personally I do capitilize Master/Dom/Top most of the time. I dont care enough to be very consistent with it.
_____________________________
Advice for New Dominants The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY
|