Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Capitalization formalities


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Capitalization formalities Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/7/2007 6:52:26 PM   
apiercedkitty


Posts: 569
Joined: 2/22/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss
What is a conjuntive? Unless you mean conjuntivitus, in that case it's pink eye lol.


A word that joins two parts of a sentence together; and, because, or. etc.

Isn't that a conjunction??

_____________________________

normal is a setting on a washing machine...

(in reply to FullCircle)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/7/2007 6:59:18 PM   
apiercedkitty


Posts: 569
Joined: 2/22/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster 

This seems rather silly...  Don't capitalize something in text because you don't while speaking.  Then why did you capitalize the first letter of a sentence or the letter "i"?  Do you do that  when you speak?

Knight's Kyra




Yes, generally I do. Most people do if they stop and listen to themselves and follow the change in tone and cadence. Try it, listen to yourself say "Though it happens, I would never do that" - you should hear the emphasis placed on the start of the sentence and on the I.



i beg to differ... the cadence is the same if you say... "Though it happens, she would never do that."

_____________________________

normal is a setting on a washing machine...

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/7/2007 7:16:18 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah

In the Leather community a submissive never addresses a Master first as it is considered a insult and a socially unacceptable action. So when the lifestyle world went ONLINE people could not see the individual or see the social markers that denoted a Master or a Slave. The Upper and lower casing of Names, be it in first, second, or third person was an online way to maintain respect and show people who might not know the person if they were a dominant or a submissive.


Um...no.  This is not the case all across all locales in the leather community.  I can believe it *might* be the case for you in *your* little corner of the leather community.  But not anywhere I've been.

quote:

I am sorry if you took it upon yourself to thing that the lowercasing of a Name or "i" or "you" or the upper casing of a name or "He" or "She" is trying to make someone sound inferior or not


That's *exactly* why they're used that way.  Some s-types like being obviously inferior (as in, "of lower rank", not necessarily "of lesser value"), some don't.  

quote:

but for god sakes why are we looking so closley at HOW someone says something and not WHAT they are saying?


Because both are important for communication - especially in a handicapped medium like online.


(in reply to SteelofUtah)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/7/2007 7:18:39 PM   
ImpGrrl


Posts: 575
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MiladyElaine

I wholeheartedly agree with capitalization of Dominant pronouns because it shows respect.  It puts the sub in his place automatically before he even voices his opinion.  he should always be lower case even at the beginning of a sentence.  I don't demand this but I DO look for it.


Unless an s-type is owned, their place is equal any d-type, unless and until they choose otherwise. 

(in reply to MiladyElaine)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 3:47:14 AM   
slavegirljoy


Posts: 1207
Joined: 11/6/2006
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline
i'm sorry you had difficulty reading my post.  Would you like me to rewrite it so that you can read it easier?  Would a bolder type or larger font be better for you?  Or, is it the style i chose to use that makes it hard for you to read?  Perhaps this board should do away with all options for type, other than plain black Arial and not allow for a wide choice of colors or for alignment or for underlining or size, etc.  Then everyone's post will look exactly like everyone else's.  Let's all have a uniform writing format here and do away with all personal style differences!  Then there will be no more complaints about individuals choosing to express themself in whatever way they feel most adequately reflects their personal style.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David
____________________________________________________________________________
"Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change,
the courage to change the things I can,
and the..........patience and tolerance to let others be themselves."
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: SunnyTawse

Slave joy, your post was hard to read; you might be a sweet girl, very obedient, a joy and a delight to be with, but... your post was hard to read.

Sunny Tawse
Sadien Domina
Archon of Rings
http://AthenorLodge.com


"Yeah, I live in my own little world. But it's OK, they know me here."
-- Sweet N Evil, Friend of the tempeste, Master of His Private Universe

(in reply to SunnyTawse)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 4:10:08 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
As with so many things in life, it’s a question (for me at least), of context; when used in general writing, such as posts on forums, etc, I confess to finding it somewhat irritating, in terms of the use of W/we, Y/you, etc.  For some reason, and I appreciate this is my issue, not anyone else’s, it makes me think “burger flipper”.
 
Between a Master and slave though I find it more an endearing sign of respect. 
 
When dealing with a girl online, however, I don’t generally insist on its use, since I haven’t personally interacted with that girl, therefore it strikes me as somewhat pompous to be insisting on it.  I sometimes dig my heels in, though, if I find the girl in question irritating or overly uppity.
 
So, to summarise, I’m both inconsistent and hypocritical.  Yay!  Go me!


quote:

ORIGINAL: GregariousGreta

I'm wondering about this, but how many people enjoy the use or nonuse of capitalization as a sign of D/s?


I'm really not that fond of it at all. I suppose it's my love of proper spelling, grammar and punctuation that makes me squick when I see it; or the fact that my brain hates reading things with screwy capitalization; or the fact that it reminds me too much of the chat speakers; or that I really don't want my sub to be a total groveling fool (not to mention I point out that particular pet peeve of mine on my profile, and not one message I received since has been properly capitalized).

Hm, what’s your opinion on it?

(in reply to GregariousGreta)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 4:13:18 AM   
feastie


Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss

What is a conjuntive? Unless you mean conjuntivitus, in that case it's pink eye lol.
quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss
I wouldn't dare speak for every one, about who was taught it or not, but not every one follows the principal. and it's their right not to


See you really shouldn't be starting a sentence with a conjunctive, no no.



The highlighted word "and" is the conjuntive, otherwise known as a conjunction.  It joins two sentences or ideas in a sentence together.

_____________________________

Snarky and loving it.

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in any post are my opinions only. They may or may not be yours.

(in reply to YourhandMyAss)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 6:04:24 AM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: feastie

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss

What is a conjuntive? Unless you mean conjuntivitus, in that case it's pink eye lol


I couldn't resist:

Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up words and phrases and clauses.
Conjunction Junction, how's that function?
I got three favorite cars
That get most of my job done.
Conjunction Junction, what's their function?
I got "and", "but", and "or",
They'll get you pretty far.
[spoken] "And":
That's an additive, like "this and that".
"But":
That's sort of the opposite,
"Not this but that".
And then there's "or":
O-R, when you have a choice like
"This or that".
"And", "but", and "or",
Get you pretty far.
[sung] Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up two boxcars and making 'em run right.
Milk and honey, bread and butter, peas and rice.
Hey that's nice!
Dirty but happy, digging and scratching,
Losing your shoe and a button or two.
He's poor but honest, sad but true,
Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo!
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up two cars to one
When you say something like this choice:
"Either now or later"
Or no choice:
"Neither now nor ever"
Hey that's clever!
Eat this or that, grow thin or fat,
Never mind, I wouldn't do that,
I'm fat enough now!
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up phrases and clauses that balance, like:
Out of the frying pan and into the fire.
He cut loose the sandbags,
But the balloon wouldn't go any higher.
Let's go up to the mountains,
Or down to the seas.
You should always say "thank you",
Or at least say "please".
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up words and phrases and clauses
In complex sentences like:
[spoken] In the mornings, when I'm usually wide awake, I love to take a walk through the gardens and down by the lake, where I often see a duck and a drake, and I wonder, as I walk by, just what they'd say if they could speak, although I know that's an absurd thought.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up cars and making 'em function.
Conjunction Junction, how's that function?
I like tying up words and phrases and clauses.
Conjunction Junction, watch that function.
I'm going to get you there if you're very careful.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
I'm going to get you there if you're very careful.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
I'm going to get you there if you're very careful





Conjunction Junction












Music & Lyrics:  
Bob Dorough

Performed by:  
Jack Sheldon

Animation:  
Phil Kimmelman and Associates

First Aired:  
1973

(in reply to feastie)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 6:57:24 AM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ImpGrrl

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah

In the Leather community a submissive never addresses a Master first as it is considered a insult and a socially unacceptable action. So when the lifestyle world went ONLINE people could not see the individual or see the social markers that denoted a Master or a Slave. The Upper and lower casing of Names, be it in first, second, or third person was an online way to maintain respect and show people who might not know the person if they were a dominant or a submissive.


Um...no.  This is not the case all across all locales in the leather community.  I can believe it *might* be the case for you in *your* little corner of the leather community.  But not anywhere I've been.



we already went over this 2 or 3 times and he did clarify before i even got here...its all good...look for his clarification on page 3....


_____________________________

One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer

(in reply to ImpGrrl)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 6:58:52 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GregariousGreta

Hm, what’s your opinion on it?


We don't the point in it. As far as we are concerned, the only entities that require capital letters for "he" and "she" are Gods and Goddesses.

As Valyraen likes to put it, I am required to submit to the English language.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to GregariousGreta)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 7:01:06 AM   
GoldStallion


Posts: 68
Joined: 8/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoldStallion

Well, I assume you mean the American Civil War, where you ungratefully attained independence? The French helped you with that? I didnt know that, but as ever I am not going to let ignorance bar me from having an opinion: typical Gallic obtuseness.

They dont want a fight, but then when they do, its on the wrong side! No wonder they dont capitalise "je"! They are, however, very clear about protecting their language and culture, so its easier to like them than not.


I think you're aiming for the Revolutionary War, not the Civil War.

And as for the French willingness to fight, check out their casualties for WWI.

thornhappy



Yes, I am sure you are correct, I certainly make no claim to knowing much about American history (although always happy to learn)- as for the comments on the french, there was a huge helping of humour and sarcasm and irony served with those posts. I would certainly not accept that any nation is short of bravery, as your very valid point about WWI (or should that be "i"?) points out.

_____________________________

You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you cant make them think.


(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 9:07:08 AM   
eastcoastgal


Posts: 12
Joined: 8/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GregariousGreta

I suppose it's my love of proper spelling, grammar and punctuation that makes me squick when I see it; or the fact that my brain hates reading things with screwy capitalization;


Hahahaha I'm with you on that!  My mother is a catholic school teacher and her mother was a catholic school teacher.  Miscapitalizations, grammar mistakes, wrong punctuation....I can't stand it!  I correct people all the time so seeing things spelled "H/hello everyone!" or "Hello All, and hello all" makes me soooo tempted to just scream at everyone but with the nature of this site and the fact that I consider myself a sub....it might not be too good of an idea I guess.  So I suck it up, grind my teeth, and let it go.  It kills me a little inside though...

(in reply to GregariousGreta)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/8/2007 9:13:10 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

WWI (or should that be "i"?)


That depends: Was the W/war dominant or submissive?

< Message edited by dcnovice -- 10/8/2007 9:14:10 AM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to GoldStallion)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 1:34:34 AM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apiercedkitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster 

This seems rather silly...  Don't capitalize something in text because you don't while speaking.  Then why did you capitalize the first letter of a sentence or the letter "i"?  Do you do that  when you speak?

Knight's Kyra




Yes, generally I do. Most people do if they stop and listen to themselves and follow the change in tone and cadence. Try it, listen to yourself say "Though it happens, I would never do that" - you should hear the emphasis placed on the start of the sentence and on the I.



i beg to differ... the cadence is the same if you say... "Though it happens, she would never do that."


Disagree, perhaps a variance in speech. When I say 'I', there is a particular inflection upon it.

(in reply to apiercedkitty)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 1:44:24 AM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Yes, generally I do. Most people do if they stop and listen to themselves and follow the change in tone and cadence. Try it, listen to yourself say "Though it happens, I would never do that" - you should hear the emphasis placed on the start of the sentence and on the I.



Except that when people talk they do not only place emphasis on words that are capitalized.  Speakers make use of cadence, tone and pauses to persuade and sell their audience on their topic.  If they only added emphasis on words that are capitalized in text then it would be a rather monotone speech.  In the public speaking training provided at my job, the teacher had us practice placing emphasis on different words within the speech and discuss how that emphasis impacted the audience.  The fact that a letter was capitalized in text was not the defining criteria for placing emphasis on a word.

Since emphasis is also placed on words that are not capitalized, I don't see how that indicates that a word is capitalized in text.

Knight's Kyra


I think you're missing a point. A capital is placed to indicate emphasis, to highlight a word of importance, that is - essentially - it's significance. When we speak, we likewise place accent and emphasis on important words. The more important the word, the more emphasis we place. I've also done public speaking training through the Toastmasters' organisation, and there is a degree of importance placed on reading and interpretation of what is written beyond the literal word. So, to clarify, we do not emphasise or accent every capital because not every capital is a mark of importance, but for words that are capitalised to emphasise their importance and significance, we do. Much in the way we use punctuation and how that too is manifested in our speech patterns.

(in reply to kyraofMists)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 4:14:09 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
I'm eleterate. Thank goodness you dont have ta be a english major to bee in this lifestyle.

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 4:35:38 AM   
chellekitty


Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
that post just made my head explode...thanks now i have a mess to clean up...i was trying to be serious...lol....

_____________________________

One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer

(in reply to Dnomyar)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 5:43:54 PM   
kyraofMists


Posts: 3292
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster
I think you're missing a point. A capital is placed to indicate emphasis, to highlight a word of importance, that is - essentially - it's significance. When we speak, we likewise place accent and emphasis on important words. The more important the word, the more emphasis we place. I've also done public speaking training through the Toastmasters' organisation, and there is a degree of importance placed on reading and interpretation of what is written beyond the literal word. So, to clarify, we do not emphasise or accent every capital because not every capital is a mark of importance, but for words that are capitalised to emphasise their importance and significance, we do. Much in the way we use punctuation and how that too is manifested in our speech patterns.


I don't think that I am missing a point; I disagreed with the idea that because we do not capitalize something in speech that we should not capitalize it in text.  You explained that capitalization in speech was placing emphasis on the word by using tone and cadence.  However, this last post reflects a different idea when you wrote, "we do not emphasise or accent every capital..."  There are words that are not emphasized in speech but are capitalized.  There are also words that are emphasized in speech but are not capitalized.  It does not seem that emphasis in speech will signify whether a word is capitalized or not.

The motivation you provided for capitalization, i.e. to show the importance of the word, actually supports a poster's capitalizing certain words.  If the purpose of capitalization is to reflect the importance of the word then it would be entirely appropriate for a writer to capitalize the words master or dominant if those words hold a particular importance to them or importance to the context of their writing.  I am sure that there are many people in this world and on this site who think those words are especially important and that the words I, submissive and slave are of significantly less importance.

Knight's Kyra

_____________________________

"Passion... it lies in all of us. Sleeping, waiting, and though unbidden, it will stir, open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us, guides us... passion rules us all. And we obey..." ~Angelus

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 11:12:05 PM   
slavegirljoy


Posts: 1207
Joined: 11/6/2006
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline
The simplest way to emphasize something is to tell readers directly that what follows is important by using such words and phrases as: especially, particularly, crucially, most importantly, and above all.
 
Other methods include:
Using an exclamation mark!
Underliningitalics, Boldface or, writing the word(s) in ALL-CAPITAL style.
 
Simply capitalizing the word is not a writing method for adding emphasis to it.  There are a lot of rules regarding the proper use of capital letters and, there are plenty of exceptions to the rules, also.  For instance, proper nouns are always supposed to be capitalized however, there are many names of companies and products that are purposely created violating this rule, such as:   eBay Inc., alli (diet product) and, iMac, iPod, iPhone, iTunes, etc. 
 
For me, i am not here to express my views in a style that suits me.  Using the lowercase lettering when i speak of myself and the uppercase lettering when i speak of my Master is my way of showing how i percieve myself, within my relationship with my Master.  If the way i choose to express myself bothers some people, oh well.  i have no control over how others percieve me.  i only have control over how i express myself.
 
Still, i continue to wonder why the 'grammar police' only concern themselves with this particular issue and not the other rules of grammar that are constantly being violated on these boards.  There are plenty of other violations to go after and, yet, they only pick on this one.  It just seems weird to me.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David
 
 


(in reply to kyraofMists)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Capitalization formalities - 10/9/2007 11:24:30 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster
I think you're missing a point. A capital is placed to indicate emphasis, to highlight a word of importance, that is - essentially - it's significance. When we speak, we likewise place accent and emphasis on important words. The more important the word, the more emphasis we place. I've also done public speaking training through the Toastmasters' organisation, and there is a degree of importance placed on reading and interpretation of what is written beyond the literal word. So, to clarify, we do not emphasise or accent every capital because not every capital is a mark of importance, but for words that are capitalised to emphasise their importance and significance, we do. Much in the way we use punctuation and how that too is manifested in our speech patterns.


I don't think that I am missing a point; I disagreed with the idea that because we do not capitalize something in speech that we should not capitalize it in text.  You explained that capitalization in speech was placing emphasis on the word by using tone and cadence.  However, this last post reflects a different idea when you wrote, "we do not emphasise or accent every capital..."  There are words that are not emphasized in speech but are capitalized.  There are also words that are emphasized in speech but are not capitalized.  It does not seem that emphasis in speech will signify whether a word is capitalized or not.

The motivation you provided for capitalization, i.e. to show the importance of the word, actually supports a poster's capitalizing certain words.  If the purpose of capitalization is to reflect the importance of the word then it would be entirely appropriate for a writer to capitalize the words master or dominant if those words hold a particular importance to them or importance to the context of their writing.  I am sure that there are many people in this world and on this site who think those words are especially important and that the words I, submissive and slave are of significantly less importance.

Knight's Kyra


If you want to go that route, then let me restate without the wiggle room you're utilising. NOONE capitalises a single word they speak, none. Since a capital is a function of TEXT, and not the voice. The VOICE uses emphasis. Same function, different implementation.

When I discuss capitalising something verbally, I am refering to the equivalent mechanism, but in order to remove confusion I will use emphasis instead.

In the translation from text to speech, I emphasise every word that is capitalised, underlined, italicised, increased in weight, or variant in typeface or style. These words have been marked out as significant, to not do so removes the significance from the resulting message. Likewise in the reverse direction, if myself or someone else has spoken a word with a particular emphasis or inflection, I will write that word with some form of textual emphasis - as before, capitalising, underlining, italics and so on. Thus message integrity is preserved.

Now, the use of "A/all", "Y/you", "T/they", "O/our" and so on have no direct vocal equivalent, they cannot be emphasised as you are required to make two sets of emphasis - one for the capital and one for the lower - on the same word, in the same utterance, and baring peoples who have been gifted voices capable of producing two or more sounds at the same time, cannot without contrivance possibly be enunicated. Likewise, there is no vocal emphasis that normal people can make that could possibly be translated into such a textual construct. They are artificial contrivances, they disrupt the natural flow of text and require the mind to perform additional steps in decoding meaning, and for these reason they are and always will be a pet peeve.





(in reply to kyraofMists)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Capitalization formalities Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.092