daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005 From: DC Metro area Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: hisannabelle greetings madrabbit, out of curiosity, how many times do you have to say that you think anything written about no limits is internet bullshit before you think you've gotten your point across? does it make you feel better each time you say it, or something? because you do repeat yourself an awful lot. thoughtfully, annabelle. As I have stated, if you want to narrate your relationship this way and have this perspective of "absolute obedience", thats fine. I can understand that headspace and mentality. I really can. Its the part where you say trust doesnt play a part in your relationship and you dont have any assurance that your Master wont make you walk off a cliff that I consider to be Internet drivel. At the end of the day, its still the same narration as any other no limit relationship. You having the mentality of "no disobedience and complete surrender" and trust and faith in your Master having some kind of ethical and moral compass that keeps you from being harmed by his actions. If you want to cloud this logic and rationality to make yourself seem more extreme and more uber then every other "no limit" relationship that functions without damage to the slave, you go right ahead. hmm, imo annabelle's description of a typical no limit, M/s relationship (her own in this case) to be quite sensible, honest, and something very far from internet drivel. but then i'm sure many consider anything i say on the subject to be drivel, fantasy, "romanticizing" or just plain looney, so what can ya do. this is not an issue i wish to continue beating into the ground, but i will say this: there is a difference between a relationship in which the slave has no limits of her own because the trust in the Master is so great, and the compatibility between the Master and slave so great, that limits are a non-issue, and a relationship in which the slave has no limits of her own because that is part and parcel of being owned (according to that particular couple's beliefs). most people have no difficulty imagining or respecting the validity and existence of the former, but for some odd reason nearly everyone seems to have a difficult time imagining and accepting the validity and existence of the latter. i am a no limits slave, which to me is a redundant statement, but i won't go there right now. by no limits of course i mean that i have given up all right to personal limits, there is nothing i would refuse my Master, he has carte blanche to do with me as he wills. now of course before i entered such a dynamic with him, i knew him and respected him, and felt that although he was certainly perverted and had his sadistic side, he was sane and his needs and desires weren't likely to lead to my destruction or death (well, at least not without good cause). but i certainly did not have complete trust in him, and we certainly did not share all the same ethics or morals. i also was not foolish enough to think that people never change over time, that what may seem unimagineable today may become a daily reality 5 years from now. imo, something far stronger than trust is needed to make a no limits relationship work. for me it took acceptance, complete unquestioned acceptance of my new place and purpose in life. acceptance that my life is no longer my own, that his desires and whims come before my needs, that from the moment i accepted his collar i exist ONLY for him. when one has reached that level of acceptance, then no limits no longer seems like an outlandish or scary thing. it's just a part of life.
|