Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Mars vs Venus


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mars vs Venus Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 9:13:53 AM   
DMFParadox


Posts: 1405
Joined: 9/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Wouldn't that give you the power to manipulate the situation to your advantage?


No. I was just downsized as part of a corporate "restructuring". My new boss is a man. My old boss, who was terrific, actually liked working with women, he hired women on his sales team. The new boss, came in with his old boys network and systematically terminated most of the women.



Ok, Sexyred, I'm thinking this is exactly the kind of perspective that troubles SixFoot.  It troubles me, and for this reason I tend to agree with his assessment--groups of women in positions of authority can be a disaster, to both men and women.  I think as society adjusts, this will be less true in time; groups of girls will act more like groups of boys.  But it hasn't happened yet.

I don't know if I can put this right, but I'll try.  Even if his reasons WERE sexist, your boss didn't fire a roomful of women.  He fired a roomful of PEOPLE he didn't like.   He may not have liked the women there, because they didn't laugh at his jokes, they don't make him feel comfortable about his sexuality, or a dozen stupid reasons.  But this is the mistake that women make in the workforce, I've seen it time out of mind: it really is NOT men vs. women.  It is ALL about personality and perspective, and if you're lucky, job performance.  If your boss had a woman there who DID laugh and could give as good as she got, and would use the same kind of 'masculine' humor when it's time to shit-test, then he will keep her.  She'll BE an old boy and a card carrying member of the network, and there are more and more women, thank fvcking god, that are picking up on this and learning to play the game. 

Two guys are at work.  The boss has a dumb idea, a guy will go, "Dude.  Come on."  And the boss will say, "I'm the boss.  Do it, jerkwad."  The guy will go, "It's stupid.  Were you drunk when you thought of this?"  And the boss will go, "Yeah, your wife gave me your whole stash.  What's dumb about it, genius?"  And the guy will go, "X is dumb. Remind me to change the locks again, you ass."  The boss will go, "Not it's not stupid, because of Y.  And there's no point, she'll just let me in anyway"  And the guy will go, "Well fvck it then.  What the hell, let's do it."  And the boss will go, "Damn right, because I said to."  And the guy will go, "Ass." And the boss will go, "You know it." The guy will go, "Seriously, this idea has problems, though.  What about doing Z?"  And the boss goes, "Fine, whatever.  Z is good.  It's on your shoulders, though."  And the guy grins and goes, "You mean where your girl's legs were last night."  The boss will go, "Get to work, buddy."

Believe it or not, this was a friendly and productive conversation.  No really, it's true.  But if either party is a woman, I will lay 90 to 1 odds that this conversation will NOT go as well if the employee outright challenges like that.

If the boss is female, then chances are, she hasn't created an environment that welcomes friendly verbal sparring like that.  Or she has, but lost control over it.  From what I've seen, female bosses tend to be more "official." or "friendly" in a warm hug kind of way than in a slap on the back kind of way.

If the boss is male and is faced with a female employee that will either not challenge anything he says at all, challenges him so indirectly that it misses his radar, or DOES challenge him and goes WAY over the top with it--she doesn't have the rhythm of an exchange like this, she misfires and comes across as an irresponsible bitch, even if all she's trying to do is play the game like her boss wants her to.  But seriously, men have been doing conversations exactly like this one since they were boys and they discovered that throwing dirt clods at each other was the best fun ever.

From boyhood, men challenge each other.  We try to gross each other out.  We get into fights. Hell, if you let us, we can get really deadly to each other.  Atomic wedgies are not fun at all, and the geeks and nerds really do catch hell from the jocks in the most direct way possible.  Boys bully each other directly.  And as a result, we learn to hit back.   A "Hey retard!" gets a "What the f* do you want?"  A punch on the arm earns you a gay joke--test, counter.  Balance.

Women bully each other INDIRECTLY.  Oh, don't get me wrong, you do a lot of the same things us guys do; but there's an added element there.  An undercurrent of, "Put a good face on it." It's much more about status within the group; and of the group; less about mano a mano.  If some dude makes me look bad enough in public, he's taking a risk that I and my buddies will fvcking kill him.  Literally.  If a girl makes another girl look bad, then there is much less of a downside; which is why sometimes it's said that girls are a lot meaner to each other than guys are. 

There is more to gain and less to lose when Alice who likes your boyfriend has a chance to make you look bad.  This is the problem women face.

To compensate, women do two things in combination.  First, they learn very quickly to be sensitive to changes in the weather.  A glance, a snarky comment, will immediately be noticed and fretted over.  Second, women will develop a philosophy of "Every woman here has Value, because if we didn't, then Alice is free to strike."  And if somebody from the outside--say, a man, or a new female employee--does something to challenge your value, then the hammer will come down HARD.  Too hard.

Mob mentality is not flexible.  If a guy or a girl has the boss--female--tell them to do something stupid, s/he may call her on it.  S/he probably won't be as outright insulting as my example above, but s/he'll challenge her.  And The Bosse will say either yes or no... but that won't be the end of it.  She'll talk about it.  She'll get nervous, angry, and uptight around that employee, and she may not even remember why.  And the other female bosses, perceptive as they are, will pick up on this.  And that employee will become a PARIAH. 

As you said... "I have found in the corporate world that women in power generally support each other, as we have to fight to keep our place."  Men have to fight to keep our place too.  Every day.  But the difference is, we're used to it.  And we don't call out the Male Establishment to deal with our problems, for the most part, no matter how it may look to women on the outside.  We are expected to stand on our own. And more importantly, we EXPECT to have dirt thrown at us, and we don't feel it as much when it happens.  (The ones who whine too much are immediately labeled as pussies... tells you something.)Women do feel it.  And they communicate that feeling, consciously or unconsciously.  Which is why women in authority are Trouble with extra caps on that T.  In isolation, they can be brought into the boy's club, but get two or more women in the same room and you have a chance of Alice showing her face.  At that point, every women there tears up her Boy's Club card and reverts to the female defense system.  You dig?


_____________________________

bloody hell, get me some aspirin and a whiskey straight

"The role of gender in society is the most complicated thing I’ve ever spent a lot of time learning about, and I’ve spent a lot of time learning about quantum mechanics." - Randall Munroe

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 9:26:10 AM   
Rover


Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
For what it's worth....
 
http://www.employerhelp.org/jimcollison/stories/female_bosses.htm
 
John

_____________________________

"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions."

Sri da Avabhas

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 9:58:17 AM   
LonDom61


Posts: 196
Joined: 9/12/2007
Status: offline
Hey, folks.  I'm just getting used to this forum interface.  Not gonna try to get on top of multiple quotes.  Group seems small enough & thread short enough that the points'll be recalled.

SFM: Very interesting point about subs perhaps making better "Public Servants" than those we have now, who aspire instead to be Public Masters.  (Doms by inclination if not ability.)  And "perhaps the meek should inherit the earth".  Nice conclusion.  Made me think of a variation I read, perhaps in a Heinlein novel? "...for the strong shall escape to the stars".

Regarding your later point about criticism of the Fallwells tarring the faith in general....well, like any extremists, his bunch is the group that stands up & shouts (& gets media coverage).  They may not represent the majority...but the more moderate don't stand up & state their different stance, so he gets to claim to represent more than he actually does.  By default.  And thereby becomes representative by personal appointment.

= = =
Bipolarbear: I copied & pasted your first post (the one citing Gerrold) into my keeper file.  I'd like to quote it, if I may, on an upcoming podcast.  Would that be okay with you?  And yes, the clarification makes it better.

It's The Big Guy who was originally so big on stoning for any transgression.  ("Oh, but that was the OLD Testament" is the dismissive refrain I've often heard to criticisms.)  The TV dudes now are referring back to (and reinterpreting) that.

Is it just me...or does NightPhoenix, who made the Jesus clarification, have a bit of the JC look (and the meek aspect, too).  That's not an ad hominem attack, just an observation.

Gwyn: several good points (as usual).  Particularly about followers not actually following (or reading) the tenets of their Book (whichever book that happens to be).

Okay, I'm gonna apologize now.  This has headed off topic and is about to enter the city limits of Rantville.  Bias: obvious. 

(But you should see what I left OUT.)

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:07:24 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Status: offline
DMF That was without a doubt the most interesting thing I've read here in awhile.  One thing you did leave out however was that female employees do recognize this and have learned to cope with it.  For example we might not do the 'punch you on the arm and make a comment about your girlfriend' thing but when I've dealt with male bosses I was able to 'challenge' them by dressing up my challenge either in a flirtation, or in shock "oh my god we can't do that because blah blah blah" and they usually come back 10 minutes later and say "you know what, new plan, do this instead." 

"Make them think it's their idea" has worked for millenia as far as marriages is concerned.  Why not bring it to the workplace?

I do think that as far as female bosses/female employees go there is a LOT of tension.  The female boss is thinking "I'm the rare woman in this position, I'm not going to let some other bitch challenge me" when the female employee corrects her, and even admiration on the employee's part can be mistaken as 'trying to get my job.'  That's one of the biggest problems with the glass ceiling...once it's broken by one woman the company thinks the problem is solved.  As long as theres *a* woman on the board, there's no need for two or three women, or god forbid half the board represented by the gender that makes up half the population.

(in reply to LonDom61)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:18:29 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Lon Dom,

Sure, you can quote me and Mr. Gerrold on your podcast.

I basically consider Falwell and other types of broadcast religion to be seperate and apart from Christianity. To my mind, they split from Christ's teachings long ago, and now just use it as a front for pulling money in. I look at them as the money lenders returning to the temple.

And yes, I noticed that NP does look a little like JC, or maybe a rock star... God, I bet he has potential lovers falling at his feet! It's the hair, isn't it?

(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:24:00 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

groups of women in positions of authority can be a disaster, to both men and women.


No doubt, but isn't the same true of groups of men? The Politburo, for instance?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:24:33 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DMFParadox

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Wouldn't that give you the power to manipulate the situation to your advantage?


No. I was just downsized as part of a corporate "restructuring". My new boss is a man. My old boss, who was terrific, actually liked working with women, he hired women on his sales team. The new boss, came in with his old boys network and systematically terminated most of the women.



Ok, Sexyred, I'm thinking this is exactly the kind of perspective that troubles SixFoot.  It troubles me, and for this reason I tend to agree with his assessment--groups of women in positions of authority can be a disaster, to both men and women.  I think as society adjusts, this will be less true in time; groups of girls will act more like groups of boys.  But it hasn't happened yet.

I don't know if I can put this right, but I'll try.  Even if his reasons WERE sexist, your boss didn't fire a roomful of women.  He fired a roomful of PEOPLE he didn't like.   He may not have liked the women there, because they didn't laugh at his jokes, they don't make him feel comfortable about his sexuality, or a dozen stupid reasons.  But this is the mistake that women make in the workforce, I've seen it time out of mind: it really is NOT men vs. women.  It is ALL about personality and perspective, and if you're lucky, job performance.  If your boss had a woman there who DID laugh and could give as good as she got, and would use the same kind of 'masculine' humor when it's time to shit-test, then he will keep her.  She'll BE an old boy and a card carrying member of the network, and there are more and more women, thank fvcking god, that are picking up on this and learning to play the game. 

Two guys are at work.  The boss has a dumb idea, a guy will go, "Dude.  Come on."  And the boss will say, "I'm the boss.  Do it, jerkwad."  The guy will go, "It's stupid.  Were you drunk when you thought of this?"  And the boss will go, "Yeah, your wife gave me your whole stash.  What's dumb about it, genius?"  And the guy will go, "X is dumb. Remind me to change the locks again, you ass."  The boss will go, "Not it's not stupid, because of Y.  And there's no point, she'll just let me in anyway"  And the guy will go, "Well fvck it then.  What the hell, let's do it."  And the boss will go, "Damn right, because I said to."  And the guy will go, "Ass." And the boss will go, "You know it." The guy will go, "Seriously, this idea has problems, though.  What about doing Z?"  And the boss goes, "Fine, whatever.  Z is good.  It's on your shoulders, though."  And the guy grins and goes, "You mean where your girl's legs were last night."  The boss will go, "Get to work, buddy."

Believe it or not, this was a friendly and productive conversation.  No really, it's true.  But if either party is a woman, I will lay 90 to 1 odds that this conversation will NOT go as well if the employee outright challenges like that.

If the boss is female, then chances are, she hasn't created an environment that welcomes friendly verbal sparring like that.  Or she has, but lost control over it.  From what I've seen, female bosses tend to be more "official." or "friendly" in a warm hug kind of way than in a slap on the back kind of way.

If the boss is male and is faced with a female employee that will either not challenge anything he says at all, challenges him so indirectly that it misses his radar, or DOES challenge him and goes WAY over the top with it--she doesn't have the rhythm of an exchange like this, she misfires and comes across as an irresponsible bitch, even if all she's trying to do is play the game like her boss wants her to.  But seriously, men have been doing conversations exactly like this one since they were boys and they discovered that throwing dirt clods at each other was the best fun ever.

From boyhood, men challenge each other.  We try to gross each other out.  We get into fights. Hell, if you let us, we can get really deadly to each other.  Atomic wedgies are not fun at all, and the geeks and nerds really do catch hell from the jocks in the most direct way possible.  Boys bully each other directly.  And as a result, we learn to hit back.   A "Hey retard!" gets a "What the f* do you want?"  A punch on the arm earns you a gay joke--test, counter.  Balance.

Women bully each other INDIRECTLY.  Oh, don't get me wrong, you do a lot of the same things us guys do; but there's an added element there.  An undercurrent of, "Put a good face on it." It's much more about status within the group; and of the group; less about mano a mano.  If some dude makes me look bad enough in public, he's taking a risk that I and my buddies will fvcking kill him.  Literally.  If a girl makes another girl look bad, then there is much less of a downside; which is why sometimes it's said that girls are a lot meaner to each other than guys are. 

There is more to gain and less to lose when Alice who likes your boyfriend has a chance to make you look bad.  This is the problem women face.

To compensate, women do two things in combination.  First, they learn very quickly to be sensitive to changes in the weather.  A glance, a snarky comment, will immediately be noticed and fretted over.  Second, women will develop a philosophy of "Every woman here has Value, because if we didn't, then Alice is free to strike."  And if somebody from the outside--say, a man, or a new female employee--does something to challenge your value, then the hammer will come down HARD.  Too hard.

Mob mentality is not flexible.  If a guy or a girl has the boss--female--tell them to do something stupid, s/he may call her on it.  S/he probably won't be as outright insulting as my example above, but s/he'll challenge her.  And The Bosse will say either yes or no... but that won't be the end of it.  She'll talk about it.  She'll get nervous, angry, and uptight around that employee, and she may not even remember why.  And the other female bosses, perceptive as they are, will pick up on this.  And that employee will become a PARIAH. 

As you said... "I have found in the corporate world that women in power generally support each other, as we have to fight to keep our place."  Men have to fight to keep our place too.  Every day.  But the difference is, we're used to it.  And we don't call out the Male Establishment to deal with our problems, for the most part, no matter how it may look to women on the outside.  We are expected to stand on our own. And more importantly, we EXPECT to have dirt thrown at us, and we don't feel it as much when it happens.  (The ones who whine too much are immediately labeled as pussies... tells you something.)Women do feel it.  And they communicate that feeling, consciously or unconsciously.  Which is why women in authority are Trouble with extra caps on that T.  In isolation, they can be brought into the boy's club, but get two or more women in the same room and you have a chance of Alice showing her face.  At that point, every women there tears up her Boy's Club card and reverts to the female defense system.  You dig?



Actually, no, I don't "dig" at all, for quite a few reasons. One, I don't "dig" sweeping generalizations of the way all men or all women act. I was relating what actually happened to ME and other women at MY company and to many other women I know personally of a certain age and status level in business.

Your description of the the frat boy posturing of men in business does happen, and whilst women can participate or attempt to participate in that, it sometimes does work and sometimes does not work.

I also do not understand what you mean by "calling out the Male Establishment to solve our problems". I don't believe women call out to anyone normally for help, they either never complain, blindly accept what happens to them, or as in the recent Isaiah Thomas case, fight back and win.

In my case, the women before me who were terminated were given big enough severance packages that they will not fight back, but not me. I am hiring the same attorney.

Oh, and completely and totally disagree that my boss fired a group of PEOPLE. Please, give me a break....patterns are patterns and if you never notice a pattern and try to break it, it will continue.

I also do not "dig" your assumption that I or any other women when challenging or speaking her mind deems her as failing to play the game. You seem to indicate that it is in our very nature to fail at being able to interpret the secret boys club code.

Perhaps when you have experienced what I and women I know have been through, you might be able to empathize.

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:28:50 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rover

For what it's worth....
 
http://www.employerhelp.org/jimcollison/stories/female_bosses.htm
 
John


That was worth alot, thanks for the link.

(in reply to Rover)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:31:30 AM   
RosesHaveThorns


Posts: 312
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
To DMF...

I actually find that post offensive, or a very bad ironic one. Are you actually implying that a man will fire a woman if he doesn't laugh at his jokes? And that no matter how flawed or strange men act, women MUST act the same way as men, rather then say, reaching some sort of compromise? And that if a woman doesn't encourage said jokes, she is a horrendous boss? Whatever happened to being good at your job?

If so, I rather hope that business isn't in customer relations or anything to do with anyone outside of the office. A business that understand why people act the way they do, and learn to be flexible about communication styles will probably succeed much better then one that gets huffy if you don't want to be punched on the arm. Especially if you try to do anything with people from another country or culture. And one that might, say, encourage cooperative behavior, that is traditonally associated with females would be too out of line, wouldn't it?

And that weak men are labeled pussies? Yes, it tells me something. That men are sexist little pigs. But I don't think that's the point you wanted to make.

And saying that gay jokes are okay in the workplace? Uh, no, I cannot personally agree with that. If you're drinking buddies, what you do on your private time, as long as it's legal, is not my business. But that behavior is not professional in my opinion, and is on par as racist jokes.

Really, this post just said that men are idiots and should not have to comprehend or function with others who don't act the same way as them. And never ever hire one in a position where they are talking to people you don't wanna piss off.

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 11:35:01 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DMFParadox



It troubles me, and for this reason I tend to agree with his assessment--groups of women in positions of authority can be a disaster, to both men and women.  I think as society adjusts, this will be less true in time; groups of girls will act more like groups of boys.  But it hasn't happened yet.



By the way, why on earth would groups of girls want to act like groups of boys? When it has been proven that women are better leaders in management, and possess the empathy and social skills traits that are helpful in business, just not recognized as such. It would be far better for boys to be coached in connecting to those traits rather than the stone-age behavior that so many exhibit in the corporate world.

P.S. I also found DMF's entire post offensive and insulting to both men and women.

< Message edited by sexyred1 -- 10/28/2007 11:36:50 AM >

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 12:21:25 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
I don't feel like facing my housework, so instead I'm spending way too much time reflecting on Paradox's post. A key word to introduce into the discussion, I think, is culture. Paradox has vividly described a particular workplace culture and, if I'm reading him right, seems to fight it effective. No doubt it is in certain circumstances. But a few dissenting thoughts come to mind:

(1) What's effective for one time and place may not work in other contexts, a point that is increasingly important in our globalized world. Take the testosterone-drenched U.S. auto industry, for instance. Detroit was famously resistant to the idea of smaller, more- fuel-efficient cars. In a classic male utterance, an auto exec (the head of GM, I think) said of compact cars, "We build cars to drive not to piss over." Result: Detroit lost huge chunks of market share to Japanese and German manufacturers who produced cars that consumers actually wanted. This is a striking example of how the stereotypically male workplace culture had huge, negative effects.

(2) The stereotypical male workplace culture is not as indispensable as some might think. During World War II, for example, many men were off fighting, with the result that women stepped into a host of traditionally "male" jobs. There was much worrying about whether they'd be able to handle such manly work. Turns out they did, and then some. Absenteeism went down, productivity went up, and American industrial might was a key factor in the Allies' winning the war. One might also consider the long history of Catholic schools and hospitals--hugely effective institutions largely led and staffed by women.

(3) The fact that a particular culture has prevailed in many places doesn't mean that it should, particularly if that culture excludes half the population. Few of us would still argue, I imagine, that blacks should be excluded from workplaces with a largely white culture.

Just some thoughts. Now off to corral the dust bunnies.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 12:46:26 PM   
LonDom61


Posts: 196
Joined: 9/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Lon Dom,

Sure, you can quote me and Mr. Gerrold on your podcast.

Cool.  Thankee.

I basically consider Falwell and other types of broadcast religion to be seperate and apart from Christianity. To my mind, they split from Christ's teachings long ago, and now just use it as a front for pulling money in. I look at them as the money lenders returning to the temple.

But they still keep the label.  And, in general, 500 flavours, all of 'em claiming to be chocolate/(_____). fill in schism...er, I mean denomination.

Speaking of the moneylenders in the temple, apparently JC made a flail (?) and used IT to chase them from the temple.  Carpenter, maybe.  but he made his own SM gear.  Gotta respect that.  "Okay, now turn the other cheek.  I'll smack that one, too." Okay, TBBoMC doesn't actually say he hit anyone.  But it was a frickin flail.


And yes, I noticed that NP does look a little like JC, or maybe a rock star... God, I bet he has potential lovers falling at his feet! It's the hair, isn't it?

Babes?  Yeah, probably.  But nah.  Can't be the hair.  CAN'T be the hair.

...Can it? 
(wanders off muttering to self)


(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 1:18:50 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Wouldn't that give you the power to manipulate the situation to your advantage?


No. I was just downsized as part of a corporate "restructuring". My new boss is a man. My old boss, who was terrific, actually liked working with women, he hired women on his sales team. The new boss, came in with his old boys network and systematically terminated most of the women.

I thought I was safe since I am the top producing salesperson at the company. On Thursday, I was told they needed someone with more "experience". This is bullshit since I have 20 years experience, as did the other women. We also had to put up with sexist crap.

So, do not assume that women can be manipulative simply because they can use their attributes; I have found in the corporate world that women in power generally support each other, as we have to fight to keep our place, even in these supposedly enlightened times.

It is still a man's world in many ways, including business, so please spare me any more sexist comments until you walk in my high heels.


In Australia we have unfair dismisal laws - boss simply can't fire you on the basis of gender or anything else that is not able to be substantiated. I also don't think there is that much of a glass ceiling here (though it does exist, but for instance, half the people I personally work with are women and are not discriminated against wage/occupation-wise). We also have some fairly anti-discrimination laws.

What I have seen is that a strong woman who knows how to use her "wiles" can often get more out of a situation than a male in the same situation.


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 2:37:41 PM   
batshalom


Posts: 1990
Joined: 9/17/2007
Status: offline
Using DMF's example and SexyRed's (and Rosie's) offense to it, let us also take into consideration that men and women communicate in very different ways.

In "A Different Voice," Carol Gilligan uses the example from Checkhov's The Cherry Orchard. Lopahin, a young ambitious merchant cannot convince Madame Ranevskaya to chop down her cherry orchard in order to save her estate. He later buys the orchard and chops it down himself.

In explanation for what he has done, he says "At times when I can't go to sleep, I think: Lord, thou has gavest us immense forests, unbounded fields and the widest horizons, and living in the midst of them, we should indeed be giants."

Madame Ranevskaya interrupts him there and says "You feel the need for giants - they are good only in fairy tales, anywhere else they only frighten us."

At the heart of any relationship - work, personal, romantic - is communication. If the emotional perceptions toward words and ideas are fundamentally different between the sexes, even though words like "giant" mean the same thing but feel different, there is going to be conflict.

Carol Gilligan has done a ton of research like this if you are interested in the topic.

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 2:39:05 PM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
With all due respect DMF, while I get what you are attempting to say....the workplace you described is one of sexual harassment, the firing you described is most definitely sexual harassment.  So women have to participate in sexual harassment to "get along"?  Your contention that women have to act like men to be successful in the workplace is obviously flawed, women can't be men...that's just how it goes.  Whether you like it or not, times have changed and the law has as well.  Catch up and get over it.

You may be uncomfortable or have had bad situations with women at work, that doesn't make it true of all females and or female bosses.  I've had some great ones, I've had some horrible ones and male ones that were even worse because not only did they lack leadership skills they lacked competence.  We don't go to work to have a great time, we go there to get the job done.  

That having been said, as I stated before it is obvious that men and women interact differently both in and out of the workplace.  There are positives and negatives on both sides.  Personally, even when someone makes overtly sexist comments to me in my occupation I do not speak out (which you know is difficult for me..haha).  The reason is this, being the female to claim I'm being discriminated against in some fashion is not role I want to play in what is in fact a good ole boys society (for me, not all occupations are like this).  However, it doesn't take long before a male will point it out and chastise and call down the person doing the inappropriate comments.  
SexyRed's situation is much different than this, obviously if you're fired unfairly you should seek remedy and speak out. 

< Message edited by laurell3 -- 10/28/2007 2:41:41 PM >

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/28/2007 3:48:53 PM   
sammiebabygirl


Posts: 465
Joined: 10/23/2004
From: Upstate, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cyntilating

quote:

ORIGINAL: camille65

George W Bush


ohh !        gonna just shut up
 
thanks Camille : )


Don't feel bad, Cyn. I was thinking George Washington Bridge.
 
jen
*a real blonde*

_____________________________

"Men are like pianos. When they get upright, i feel GRAND!!!"

http://charldine.com/jen2820

(in reply to Cyntilating)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/29/2007 2:47:34 AM   
hermione83


Posts: 393
Joined: 8/1/2007
Status: offline
DMF, who said that dominant, masculine, or unprofessional traits were the best for business (which really should be the focus and not what those currently on the top think of anyone)? It's already been mentioned that is surely hasn't been shown to be the case when the opposite have been given a chance.  Let's hope that customers don't ever walk in and interrupt such "kidding around." Women and men both seem to think the only problem with most women in the working world is that they just can't seem to act like men. But why should they have to?? Why is masculinity valued higher than femininity? That perception is the real problem, imho. Why can't people with different approaches and personalities just get to do their jobs? Why do nice people finish last, guys or gals? I think it's a quite the shame that the men (and women) who are the biggest jerks, and tell the most insensitive jokes, are the ones to get ahead. If we need to force everyone into conformity, how about everyone tries to fit in with the meek, polite, kind, and professional?

(in reply to sammiebabygirl)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/29/2007 2:48:49 AM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
well put hermione.
l

(in reply to hermione83)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/29/2007 3:04:55 AM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
Interestingly, when Kellie worked with us (at where I work), she was regarded as "one of the boys" - because she acted like one, she told crude jokes, drank and carried on like your fairly average Australian yobbo (sans the bad clothes and ball/butt scratching). The point here then, raised by hermione's comment, is why she should have had to adopt that persona (since, in reality and outside of the workmate circle, she retained a good deal of feminity) in order to be accepted. I don't think, on contemplation, that the men at this particularly place of business forced it on her, since we have other female employees who are not likewise affected - so it seems to me that she joined the business with that expectation in her own head. I'm not sure of her occupational history before that, and whether she picked it up from a previous job, or whether she picked it up from social expectations and peer pressure.

Edited to add: The point being, how much of the "glass ceiling" exists due to perpetuation by women through their own expectations and what society has already told them? Not being a woman, I can't answer this.


< Message edited by SixFootMaster -- 10/29/2007 3:06:59 AM >


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Mars vs Venus - 10/29/2007 3:19:14 AM   
Decimus


Posts: 174
Joined: 9/17/2007
Status: offline
Fast Reply after reading about half the posts.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyLegs
But for other generalities, how about an IQ above 130?

(I will refrain from other generalities to avoid flames!)

I concur!

_____________________________

Here is my story that some people have asked for, www.beginningofdreams.com

(in reply to LadyLegs)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mars vs Venus Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105