MadRabbit -> RE: Are you a control freak? (11/7/2007 10:11:41 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Focus50 quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: RRafe I prefer situations that are based on practical valuation. Rather than some romantic freaky concept that favors a woman's "right to be insecure and controlling". Most of what I see called submission in places like this-is such a total lie. Why do you think I keep telling people...."pull your silly heads out of your fantasy sphincters-and get real?"[;)] To me, its just annoying and not anything I am interested in. My enjoyment in a M/S relationship is getting things the way I want them and molding a person's behaviors to my tastes. I generally look for a person with a genuine desire to please and to serve as opposed to someone with a desire to be controlled. In my experiences with dating, these people are hard to find, because even though 99% of submissives and slaves will claim they want to serve and be pleasing, its bullshit for many. They are interested in being controlled, they want a ton of rules, they want those rules to be reinforced, and they want them to be reinforced their way. This is how I primarily make the distinction between my definition of a slave and my defintion of a submissive. The desire to serve and please as opposed to the desire to be dominated. I love and enjoy control and domination as a fetish, but someone who has a constant need for reinforcement and control every waking moment of the day is just simply annoying to me. I have no interest in serving as a domination object. I want things done my way, I want improvement, and I want results, not a constant struggle to get things my way from a partner solely seeking to get their discipline and control fetish fulfilled. The control games are the biggest red flag with me and I won't put up with them for long. They simply ruin the fabric of a relationship that would otherwise go smoothly and be completely fulfillng and enjoyable if they would simply take responsibility for their own obedience. Quite an impressive description of passive "dominance".... Tagging yourself as "dominant" is your contribution to a D/s dynamic and the rest is up to the sub to prove through her eternal service/actions that she's submissive, right? This is why I often refer to D/s as a *dynamic*! It's my experience that the average sub who tests boundaries; is bratty etc, is not looking to control the relationship but looking/wanting to see if the "dom" can deliver on his end. IE, is capable of walking the talk! And usually when the Dom/me can deliver, the testing and brattiness etc is no longer an issue. I admire the OP's honesty in that last paragraph (the one you quoted with your first post). I don't see any red flag at all; just you having a lazy attitude.... I am Dom; hear me roar? But I don't hafta do or prove anything, right? *wink* Focus. Actually, I prefer a relationship with a mix of passive and active dominance. I am not so silly as to think that I have to do nothing but sit on the couch and order beer cans (your pretty familiar with that I bet). However, I primarily look for a partner where obedience and submission happens on an internal level and is not completely dependant on external factors from me. Why? Because I happen to like consistant obedience and its my opinion the only way to get that is if the slave is willing to take responsibility for her own obedience on an internal level and not something conditional based on external factors. And hey, homie...I know this might sound crazy in your "Submissive never has any responsibility or does anything wrong world", but there is quite a few women my age out there who don't really care about being obedient or responsible and just care about feeling dominated or getting a spanking. See...if you had actually backed up and read everything I had wrritened as opposed to following your all too predictable behavior of trying to diss other dominants to make yourself look good, you would realize this wasn't a testimenant to purely passive dominance as I have said... quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit Behavior modifcation, active dominance, and exertion of control are means to an end for me, the end being a person who has been molded into someone I find pleasing and satisfying. However, when the end is the means, then its pointless and not desirable to me, because its not about getting an end result. Call me lazy if you want to, bro, but if someone can't accomplish the simple request they agreed to of wearing certain clothes to date without me pushing, reinforcing, and dragging them along all because they want to feel how big and bad I am, thats not my ideal partner at all. If someone's motivation is to get reinforcers and feel my dominance through a series of control games and power struggles as opposed to just simply accomplishing what I want and making things run smoothly, I am not too interested in that person.
|
|
|
|