GoddessDustyGold
Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004 From: Arizona Status: offline
|
Agreed. And you know, My dear friend, if this was being approached in another way, I honestly would not have aproblem. For instance, if the police were working together with the local community and offering to "help" upon invitation. They can say they are available to search homes upon request I just don't like the fact that they are inviting themselves, and I especially don't like that there are people who think this is perfectly acceptable. It is the presumption, yet again, that people are too stupid to realize what is good for the, so Nanny will do it for them. quote:
But Davis said the point of the program, dubbed Safe Homes, is to make streets safer, not to incarcerate people. "This isn't evidence that we're going to present in a criminal case," said Davis, who met with community leaders yesterday to get feedback on the program. "This is a seizing of a very dangerous object. . . . "I understand people's concerns about this, but the mothers of the young men who have been arrested with firearms that I've talked to are in a quandary," he said. "They don't know what to do when faced with the problem of dealing with a teenage boy in possession of a firearm. We're giving them an option in that case." I disagree that they are giving them an option. I see it as deciding that the mothers are not doing anything or are incapable of learning how to handle it, so the police will. Not by offering assistance if requested, or a special community awareness program that is optional, but by stating "we are going to do this to make sure the streets are safer, and you have the right to not let us, but..." And people allow it to happen, because they have become unable to not depend on the government to take care of everythjng and keep everyone safe. In St Louis, it appears the program started to fall apart because funding ran out, and the support was waning, especially in view of the fact that police began using their own intelligence, as opposed to offering a "public service" and relying on neighborhood tips. We are very fortunate in this country that we take for granted that they cannot do this without our permission. As long as permission continues to be given, little by little, we are then only one step away from losing the freedom altogether. It worries Me.
< Message edited by GoddessDustyGold -- 11/17/2007 6:30:14 PM >
_____________________________
Dusty They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety B Franklin Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them The Hidden Kingdom
|