Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 8:38:56 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Actually, no, Singapore has four national languages, and they do just fine.  Many countries have more than one official language.

I'm not suggesting that the national language of the U.S. should be anything other than English.  Just saying...that people don't always bother to make sure that their statements are supported by those pesky things called facts.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

A common spoken language should be a requirement for any country.




If we are getting our pesky facts straight…..then...The national language of Singapore is Malay…Other languages are spoken but they have a national language in the same way I would like to see  the United States to have one.
 Butch


< Message edited by kdsub -- 11/29/2007 8:44:26 AM >

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 8:59:12 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
I think Singapore recognizes 4 official languages, not just Malay.

quote:


The four official languages of Singapore are Mandarin, Malay, Tamil and English. English is the most common language used and is the language which unites the different ethnic groups. Children are taught in English at school but also learn their mother tongue to make sure they don't lose contact with their traditions.



http://www.singaporeexpats.com/about-singapore/culture-and-language.htm

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 9:31:11 AM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Stella, we already have "multi-culturalism" in the U.S. and in the U.K. I'm sure as well.
What's the problem?


Popeye, probably like you and most other people here I don't have any problems with multiculturalism. I don't have any issues with race, I don't see white, I don't see black, I don't see yellow and I don't see red. I see a head, arms, legs, a body and I recognise this is be a human, a being of just one race, the human race.

I don't have anything against people who are prejudiced. When you get a lot of different people living together who are all different you're bound to come up against issues of prejudice. This knowledge can be gained very easily from history, any history from anywhere in the world.

I advocate tolerance, but not unconditional tolerance. Freedom is a right and carries with it responsibility. Not everybody however is prepared to accept that responsibility and some even abuse their freedom to harm and hurt others.

I see the problem as this. Everyone knows history and remembers it, very few people actually learn from it.

A shining example is persecution of the Jews by the Nazis in the 1930's and throughout the Second World War, and the previous persecution of Jews in Eastern Europe throughout the first half of the 20th Century. The whole world went to war over this issue in the Second World War. Today, even as some of the veterans of the Second World War are still alive we have a similar situation with persecution of the Muslims. The same situation - a need to control resources and capital in another country fulfilled through the use of military action and occupation of that territory.

History has a nasty habit of repeating itself. Hitler occupied Poland and wanted Russia, and it was in Stalingrad where it all fell apart. The 'coalition forces' have Iraq and have been talking about Iran, the only Shiite Muslim country in the world. Only the consequences of Teheran would be far greater than Stalingrad. Better not to even think about it.

This is where the second problem is - talking about 'the solution'. Well Himmler tried 'The Final Solution' and we should all know from the results of this 'Final Solution' that none of these 'solutions' work.

The only solution to me is to accept that people are different, embrace multiculturalism, overcome our prejudices and learn to live together. Therefore I personally don't see the problem, because the solution is sitting there right under your nose.

This is the third problem. How can we as a world change the current way of thinking where everything is based on productivity and profit and take back power and control from the few who are exploiting the world's resources, capital and manpower and redistribute it more fairly among people all over the world to help bring an end to poverty?

Answers on a postcard.


_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 9:43:24 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Whoa, Stella, you swerved off into about 10 different topics there!
One can be for multi-culturalism but at the same time against illegal "immigration".
Without laws our countries are nothing.
It's funny, the people who advocate for illegal "immigration" are always trying to hide behind other laws.
They try to include illegal aliens in "multi-culturalism" for some reason.
That's not a "multi-culturalism" issue it's a law enforcement issue.
And yes, I like multi-culturalism too!
I grew up around Irish, Italians, Sicilians, Greeks, Swedish,Jewish, Polish, Germans when I was a kid.
The Jews and Greeks didn't want me dating their daughters though.
Oh, and one English guy too.
I had "the talk" out in the back yard with three of them.
They didn't feel it "appropriate" that someone of Irish descent went out with their daughter. True story!

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 11/29/2007 9:49:17 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 9:54:50 AM   
EPGAH


Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
Kudos, popeye, once again cutting through the crap! Illegals are just that: illegal!
I don't think anyone has a problem with immigrants, as long as they can come in legally--and obey "those other laws" too!

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 10:12:05 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I think Singapore recognizes 4 official languages, not just Malay.

quote:


The four official languages of Singapore are Mandarin, Malay, Tamil and English. English is the most common language used and is the language which unites the different ethnic groups. Children are taught in English at school but also learn their mother tongue to make sure they don't lose contact with their traditions.




Yes but Malay is the offical language

Butch




< Message edited by kdsub -- 11/29/2007 10:49:31 AM >

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 10:42:56 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Stella, this is your quote from an earlier post.

quote:

What has Thatcher got to do with Poland? Was it not Thatcher who together with Reagan sought to bring an end to the Cold War and communism? Oh and was it not Margaret Thatcher who persuaded George Bush senior to declare war on Iraq for invading Kuwait in 1990?

It was her government and people who killed off the British mining industry - an industry which like all our others needed restructuring, not destroying or selling off - by importing cheaper Polish coal, and then when that proved too expensive and a cheaper alternative was found, the Polish mining industry was destroyed and cheaper Ukrainian coal was imported.  


Your ideas about coal dont tally with the facts. The coal industry has been in long decline, especially since the 50s. The rush for cleaner fuels for indoor us, such as north sea gas, and oil fired central heating. The closure of the larger UK industries in iron and Steel. The clamour for cheaper and cleaner energy such as gas and nuclear power, long oppossed by Labout until they took office i may add, all of these spelt the end of coal. The miners strike was just the end of an era, yes Thatcher wanted to put the unions in their place, but the decline in coal useage in the Uk had been going on for the previous 30 years at least.
You speak of the Polish mining industry, it has somewhere around 10% of the worlds coal reserves. If, and you didnt provide evidence, Britain started buying coal from a cheaper source, whats wrong with that. Everyone producing things for profit is how it is, tell me how else people will pay for goods. Or rather, tell me who should pay the cost to offset profit, because one way or another, the general public will pay, as per usual.

Tell me also that the first invasion of Iraq, to free Kuwait was wrong ? If that was wrong, was intervention in Bosnia to save the Muslims also wrong ?  Why keep quiet about the Russian attrocities in Poland in WW2, yet make a point of the German ones ? is one atrocity any less than the other, or do we pick and choose which is okay due to political viewpoints ?

Finally, nice trick admiring politicians who always held the same viewpoints and forgetting to mention Tina ( There Is No Alternative ) Thatcher.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 10:50:08 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Have you ever actually been to Singapore?  Most Singaporeans don't speak Malay.  Almost all speak English, and most speak at least one other language.

Signs are in four languages everywhere, so it's not like what you want to see in the U.S.  Not even close.  Here, see for yourself:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Quadrilingual_danger_sign_-_Singapore_(gabbe).jpg/800px-Quadrilingual_danger_sign_-_Singapore_(gabbe).jpg

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

If we are getting our pesky facts straight…..then...The national language of Singapore is Malay…Other languages are spoken but they have a national language in the same way I would like to see  the United States to have one.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 10:54:38 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Singapore airport with its inner garden and its pond full of nishikigoi... and its groovy anti-chewing gum laws!

WHACK.

_____________________________



(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 10:56:55 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
We can all find links

http://www.regit.com/regitour/spore/about/language.htm

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:01:11 AM   
MsBearlee


Posts: 1032
Joined: 2/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Singapore airport with its inner garden and its pond full of nishikigoi...


Heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy... I built such a pond; and added the butterfly version:  http://goldiloucks.mystarband.net/images/LafayettePondLG.jpg
 
Aren't they LOVELY creatures?

edited to add:  The pond was 10 x 12 x 5'-deep; hard to tell in the pic; but plenty big for some large fish.  I'm gonna build another here...I mean it too!   LOL

< Message edited by MsBearlee -- 11/29/2007 11:03:32 AM >


_____________________________

A must read for submissives! (click here)

This one, as well!

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:03:41 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
They're fierce: I wouldn't like to find one on my dinner plate.

_____________________________



(in reply to MsBearlee)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:07:22 AM   
MsBearlee


Posts: 1032
Joined: 2/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

They're fierce: I wouldn't like to find one on my dinner plate. 


Fierce?  Naw... they're just big goldfish.  I used to sit on the edge and dangle my bearfeet (smiles); they come up and nibble on 'em!  Their teeth are very tiny... and it feels wild.
 
Okay, I've saying for some time I really like a man with a foot fetish; perhaps it's ME with the fetish!  LMAO

_____________________________

A must read for submissives! (click here)

This one, as well!

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:12:34 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I think Singapore recognizes 4 official languages, not just Malay.

quote:


The four official languages of Singapore are Mandarin, Malay, Tamil and English. English is the most common language used and is the language which unites the different ethnic groups. Children are taught in English at school but also learn their mother tongue to make sure they don't lose contact with their traditions.




Yes but Malay is the offical language

Butch





Of who?  The Tamils?

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:34:56 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I surrender Alumbrado….Heck I’m lucky to speak English…I sure can’t spell with it.
I’m just wondering where my “should” speak a common language turned into something else.
I don’t want people not to speak their native tongue…just be able to speak and understand a common language in their adopted country.
Butch

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 11:59:06 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Please re-read the whole post.



'No need....you've repeated yourself for me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

2) as part of the new settlement, everyone who wishes to be a citizen takes part in the formulation of the rules, which I would suggest has to be from the ground up by way of referenda to approve/discard existing and proposed new rules.



lol.......what sort of response do you think you'll receive when you push your questionairre through peoples' doors asking for "the rules"?.......

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

If the majority vote in a referendum to decide the official language for the country shows Urdu as being the choice, then Urdu will be used.



It may have escaped your notice....the English speak English.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

If the majority think that it is a good idea to legally protect "honour killings" then that shall be the way.



Yes, of course, we condone murder.

E, that tit job is detracting from your brain capacity......that was easily your weakest post since the dawn of time.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 1:16:10 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

"Their" country, thompson?

You're sounding ridiculous.

Sanity:
I am sorry...you were not aware that the U.S. had invaded Mexico and took half of their country?  It was in all the history books.  How could you have missed it?
thompson

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 3:21:11 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Yes, but some of us actually know what we're talking about.  Have you been to Singapore?  Have you ever even talked to someone from Singapore?  Did you see the sign in four languages?  (That's called "quadrilingual," for those of you without the benefit of a multi-cultural education.)

Or how about Switzerland?  Are you going to find a link telling me that Switzerland doesn't have four languages either?  (Hint: They're French, German, Italian, and Romansh.  Yes, Romansh.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

We can all find links

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 3:23:51 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Wasn't there a very similar conversation a few months ago? Or am I stuck in a timewarp?

_____________________________



(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? - 11/29/2007 3:24:40 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Stella, this is your quote from an earlier post.

quote:

What has Thatcher got to do with Poland? Was it not Thatcher who together with Reagan sought to bring an end to the Cold War and communism? Oh and was it not Margaret Thatcher who persuaded George Bush senior to declare war on Iraq for invading Kuwait in 1990?

It was her government and people who killed off the British mining industry - an industry which like all our others needed restructuring, not destroying or selling off - by importing cheaper Polish coal, and then when that proved too expensive and a cheaper alternative was found, the Polish mining industry was destroyed and cheaper Ukrainian coal was imported.


Your ideas about coal dont tally with the facts. The coal industry has been in long decline, especially since the 50s. The rush for cleaner fuels for indoor us, such as north sea gas, and oil fired central heating. The closure of the larger UK industries in iron and Steel. The clamour for cheaper and cleaner energy such as gas and nuclear power, long oppossed by Labout until they took office i may add, all of these spelt the end of coal. The miners strike was just the end of an era, yes Thatcher wanted to put the unions in their place, but the decline in coal useage in the Uk had been going on for the previous 30 years at least.
You speak of the Polish mining industry, it has somewhere around 10% of the worlds coal reserves. If, and you didnt provide evidence, Britain started buying coal from a cheaper source, whats wrong with that. Everyone producing things for profit is how it is, tell me how else people will pay for goods. Or rather, tell me who should pay the cost to offset profit, because one way or another, the general public will pay, as per usual.


Points taken, Politesub, but I did write restructuring, not maintaining. I give an example of restructuring which was successful in a few of the coalmines in South Wales where the miners themselves took over.

I've also got nothing against profits being made for goods and services. Capitalism works. But also when you start reducing costs and overheads to maximize profits in some cases the quality of your goods and services can be affected. Sometimes investment is needed. And besides, certain things I feel shouldn't be run for profit, such as the health service, education and refuse collection.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Tell me also that the first invasion of Iraq, to free Kuwait was wrong ? If that was wrong, was intervention in Bosnia to save the Muslims also wrong ? Why keep quiet about the Russian attrocities in Poland in WW2, yet make a point of the German ones ? is one atrocity any less than the other, or do we pick and choose which is okay due to political viewpoints ?


No, intervention in Bosnia wasn't wrong. But from what I remember Saddam Hussein didn't seriously have any serious territorial claims to Kuwait, it was an act of provocation to make a point, and from my perspective it worked. I was giving an example with Germany, I am aware of the Russian atrocities not just during the Second World War, but also at the start of the century when they were purging the country of Jews. How else do you think Leeds suddenly became a city, and why does it have the largest Jewish population in the UK? I'm not picking and choosing atrocities. However if you like we can discuss the subject of Enigma and the mysterious death of General Sikorsky during the Second World War. I'd be interested to know what you think about that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Finally, nice trick admiring politicians who always held the same viewpoints and forgetting to mention Tina ( There Is No Alternative ) Thatcher.


This wasn't a trick. As far as I'm aware Colonel Gaddafi has been in power in Libya for over thirty years but hasn't declared war on anybody, and neither he nor Ken Livngstone have caused as much unemployment or poverty as Margaret Thatcher and her government and 'friends'. I assume you see the point I'm making here.


_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094