sexyred1
Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: takenbyjohnr07 exactly also. but don't you agree that the movie never took the time or the extra 100 dollars to shoot a scene or two to maybe show his feelings? Why should the filmaker provide a movie goer with every little detail neatly tied up? Most films are made by an artist who wants to portray his or her vision, not to spoonfeed the mass public who likes only happy endings. I am constantly shocked by how little the general public wants to actually think and attribute their own thoughts to a film without having every detail handed to them. Perhaps you should go back and read the original Story of O, which is a very fascinating book, in my opinion. It is of course, a bit nihilistic, but I believe that is the crux of the story, that O wanted to annihilate herself through her service as a slave to both Rene and Sir Stephen. As I recall, and I read it years ago, Rene was her lover who gave her to Sir Stephen; neither man appeared to love O, while she loved them both. On another point, there are very few films that are as good as a book; simply because there is nothing comparable to the human to mind and its potential for imagination that even the most filmaker can conjure up. And I saw the film, it sucked.
|