tigerstyle
Posts: 168
Joined: 5/25/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote:
ORIGINAL: tigerstyle quote:
ORIGINAL: slavegirljoy Of course, it's well-known that rape isn't 'about sex' This piece of dogma never made any sense to me. The idea that rape could be "about power, not sex" is only coherent if sex and power are somehow separate. Which, as BDSMers, we know not to be the case. Huh? Of course they can be seperate. There are very valid power exchanges without any sex at all. Personally I do think rape is entirely about power, not sex. Otherwise, they'd just go to a bar and get laid - some rapists are very attractive men who don't need to rape girls to get laid! Hell one of the ways rapists have been caught is because when the police mentioned a certain type of knot used to bind the victim, the rapist's consenting sexual partner realized it was the same used on them. That's interesting--the rapist had not only a consenting partner, but they were obviously involved in some kind of kinky tie-up games, in other words, in power play. This would seem to be evidence to me that the rapist liked power imbalance in his sex--and his raping was just a case of that carried to extremes. The fact that there can be power exchanges that don't involve sex doesn't have any bearing on the fact that, for some people, it is a sexual act to assert power over someone by rape. "Rape must be about power, not sex, because some rapists are attractive and would have no problem getting sex the normal way". This leaves out something which should be rather obvious to BDSM types....maybe the rapist gets off on rape, not licit sex. As I understand it, the power/sex thing comes from the attempt of feminism to overcome a traditional rape defense: "He had no control over his burning lust". While there's no excuse for such a crime, the idea that rapists are not getting off on their acts sexually is too much to swallow.
|