Rover
Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle I don't do TPE type relationships for this reason. To begin, TPE relationships do not require that a Dominant make all the decisions (that would be micromanagement which appeals to very few people), just that they make all the decisions they care to make. That is a substantial distinction. quote:
I asked that question because I'm wondering why Dominants wouldn't care about such things. Some do, some don't. It depends upon the dynamic employed in their relationship. No one holds a gun to a submissive's head forcing them to accept a dynamic that does not work for them. That's the relative nature of consent (ie: we do not all consent to the same things). quote:
I've also already asked what this has to do specifically to D/s rather than a normal marriage. It has particular relevance to power exchange relationships because of their nature, in which one partner is authorized to exercise most or all of the control in the relationship. With that right comes additional responsibility. Both the nature of the control and it's resultant responsibility are significantly different than that in the vast majority of marriages. quote:
I'm just wondering why the question is being asked? Because someone found it relevant to their relationship. If it's not relevant to yours, don't lose any sleep over it. But don't be an obstacle to information that may be valuable to someone else just because it's of no value to you, personally. That would be rather selfish, don't you think? quote:
It's not unheard of for people to get into relationships with people that take control of aspects of their lives. It happens in the non D/s relationship too, so why the question here? Because it happens infrequently in other lifestyles does not diminish its relevance to power exchange relationships. quote:
The problem is the OP asked is it right to take control of a young person's life in a D/s type relationship rather than an older person but young people get into non D/s relationships all the time where similar control is give away. Therefore surely it doesn't matter because if it wasn't a Master doing it could be their boyfriend instead? I did not see where the OP asked whether it was "right to take control" (because he didn't). He asked whether it was wise to *do* for a submissive what they have not yet learned to do for themselves, and what the ramifications might be if that were to happen. That seems a very reasonable question, in order to understand the consequences of an action before taking it. Once the cat is out of the bag, it's a little late to be making that sort of inquiry. Now that your questions have been answered, I'm sure you can either find a way to make a positive contribution to the ongoing discussion, or ignore it should it no longer interest you. John
_____________________________
"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions." Sri da Avabhas
|