RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


RealityLicks -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 10:03:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

What Israel does to palestine isn't any harsher than what hamas does to fatah or what saudis do to ismalis or what one afghan tribe does to another.


That's like saying apartheid South Africa was justified because Britain fought Argentina or because the Serbs fought the Bosnians.  A crime is a crime is a crime; it cannot be justified by another act in another place.  If I kill my neighbour, it does not excuse you killing yours.

Also, the acts of oppression Israel carries out, punishing entire communities for the crimes of a few, the erection of walls, unfair controls on movement etc are not within the powers of most of the groups you've named to carry out.

Contrary to your stated position, not all Islamic countries can be termed fundamentalist.  For instance, Jordan has a consitutional monarchy and universal suffrage - its a far cry from the Taliban.  Iran and Afghanistan are probably the only countries whose systems would satisfy the fundamentalists.

You must learn to distinguish between opinions and facts.  Others get to fight these wars, more's the pity.




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 10:30:06 AM)

quote:


That's like saying apartheid South Africa was justified because Britain fought Argentina or because the Serbs fought the Bosnians. A crime is a crime is a crime; it cannot be justified by another act in another place. If I kill my neighbour, it does not excuse you killing yours.



Its not that the Israelis are justified. It is that it makes no sense for muslim nations to place attention on Israel for the exact same crimes that they commit. Muslim leaders divert attention from their failures by blaming Israel for making Muslims feel slighted when really Israel can only be blamed for border conflicts in very small specific regions and Israel has plenty of Muslims within its borders anyways. Come to think of it, Israel's border conflicts are with a lot of christians as well as muslims, so it can hardly be called a problem of a state that oppresses Islam or Muslims on basis of their religion. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and many other nations officially oppress Muslims on basis of their religion if they are of the wrong sect.

quote:

Contrary to your stated position, not all Islamic countries can be termed fundamentalist.


Where did I state that position? Just because the govt of a country is not fundementalist does not mean the clerics/mullahs/imams aren't either.

Nearly all sunni religious leaders are fundementalists because the major theological schools that train and produce those leaders are all extremist ways of thought. Theological schools which train leaders are in Egypt and Jordan and other countries with secular regimes, but they are still mired in Islamist ways of thinking. Where is the madrassa for reformist muslims? Where are their pupils going? Nowhere- if this exists, it's almost unheard of.




Politesub53 -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 10:33:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

I was the first person to say that Muslims know there will be no hand chopping n the UK. What I said was that they agree with the principles behind hand chopping. And in any case, what they really want is shariah as applied to domestic and family affairs, where shariah law is particularly incompatible with western law.

quote:


No disrespect meant but who and where ? I don`t know who you may or may not know, i can only base my opinions on what i read and see here in the UK Media, and by talking to the few Muslims i know.


This practice is guarenteed to result in ignorance. After WWII, ten years later you had SS officers being quiet neighbors watering their lawns. Nice guys then.



Explain why what i hear from people i talk to and see in the media holds no relevence. Bringing the SS into the equasion does very little for your argument. You claim to know what Muslims world wide are planning to do, yet its obvious you cant live in every Country you mention. If you are basing some opinions on what you have read in the press, how does that make your opinions anymore qualified than mine.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:04:20 AM)

"We" are being told that if only "we" didn't focus so much on Islamic fundamentalism and if only "we" would be more inclusive in our outlook then all would be well and "we" could all live happily ever after.

Well the fact is that "we" did exactly that and prior to the 2nd invasion of Iraq "we" were repeatedly warned, in particular by the French secret service, that London was a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism to the point that London became known as Londonistan. "We" however knew better and followed the inclusive multi culturalist path because "we" wanted to be reasonable and inclusive.

"We" were wrong and the French were right.

One major successful bombing incident and one major failed bombing incident later "we" still appear  not to realise the danger.Example the fuss over the Muslim MP being "bugged" while he was interviewing if not a convicted terrorist one who was under suspicion of terrorist activity.
I sometimes wonder whose side you Wishy Washy types are on.




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:12:23 AM)

quote:

You claim to know what Muslims world wide are planning to do, yet its obvious you cant live in every Country you mention.


Muslims world wide? Because the religious leaders believe in a strict, literal and extremely intolerant kind of Islam? The people are not monolithic. While many- perhaps even a majority- are swayed by religious leaders, many are silent simply out of poverty and because of the threat of violence.

Not all muslims have some global agenda. But the religious leaders with any kind of ambition do. Many of the political leaders and tribal warlords share the same ambition.




LadyEllen -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:13:30 AM)

Lets just assume for a moment that the "rivers of blood" thinkers here are right - that Islam and Muslims are hellbent on converting us or killing us, and its just that most are good at hiding it.

What do we suggest?

They will not repent their religion.
They will not swear allegiance to whatever we swear allegiance to.
They will not stop in the pursuit of their ends.

Seems to me that such a scenario leaves us with only two choices - wholesale deportation or wholesale genocide. Anyone up for that? Anyone here prepared to shoot little Muslim kids?

Now it may - just may, come to that one day, if the doom mongers are correct. But I'll be damned if I am prepared right now to give up on my view that the doom mongers are wrong about the majority of Muslims and that much of what drives the minority is provoked by us (the wider us), and therefore resolvable by us. The alternative is to set out now, down a road which will end in suffering the likes of which we reviled the nazis for - such a thought process can end no other way.

E




seeksfemslave -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:14:24 AM)

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/article2896431.ece
quote:


The fate of Theo van Gogh, the Dutch film-maker who was murdered by a Muslim extremist in 2004 after he made a film portraying violence against women in Islamic societies, is the most chilling example of what can happen to an artist who is perceived to have offended Islam. Perry said that he had also been scared by the reaction across the Islamic world to Danish cartoons deemed anti-Muslim in 2006 and by the protests against Salman Rushdie’s knighthood this year


Dont worry Wishy Washies, we wouldnt have a problem were it not for nasty racists like me he he he he he he he he





Politesub53 -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:15:57 AM)

Seeks i reject the fact that respect for the laws of the land makes people wishy washy. There is a distinct law that the security services are unable to bug MPs, this was broken. I suspect you would scream blue murder if you found out your telephone was being tapped, or is that okay ?




seeksfemslave -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:22:47 AM)

It does not require a majority of Muslims to be prepared for militant activity for serious damage to be done
For example see the havoc and suffering inflicted  in Northern Ireland by militant minorities on both sides of the Christian divide.

Another example, in a recent honour killing investigation the police let it be known that cooperation was not forthcoming from the majority of the relevent community.
In other words their loyalties were not to UK law  but to their own cultural values.




Politesub53 -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:24:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

Not all muslims have some global agenda. But the religious leaders with any kind of ambition do. Many of the political leaders and tribal warlords share the same ambition.


You are correct, many do, yet equally, many don`t. This still misses the point, there isnt a ground swell of support for either fundamentalism or Sharia law here in the UK. You have still not said if you live in the UK, and if you dont, how do you know what the Muslim community here is thinking ? 




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:27:57 AM)

quote:


Now it may - just may, come to that one day, if the doom mongers are correct. But I'll be damned if I am prepared right now to give up on my view that the doom mongers are wrong about the majority of Muslims and that much of what drives the minority is provoked by us (the wider us), and therefore resolvable by us. The alternative is to set out now, down a road which will end in suffering the likes of which we reviled the nazis for - such a thought process can end no other way.

ah law, are peaceful, want to live within western laws and morality" or "Muslims are hell bent on converting and killing us"

The reality is something this- a very small minority of muslims is willing to kill people- a fraction of 1%. About 5% of muslims are willing to directly fund and support killers. Perhaps about 20% of Muslims with means are willing to indirectly support terrorists

Why are there only two alternatives in your world? Either "nearly all muslims dislike sharithrough funding madrassas or other types of support and recruitment networks for them. About half of Muslims world wide do not strongly object to the aims of fundementalists. They do not care if they live in a state where Shariah is the law of the land. Depending on the country, a lot of those who are ethnically Muslims aren't at all religious. Turkey and Iran have far more atheists than the US or UK does and anyone who is an atheist has no love for fundementalists. But only a small percent of Muslims who are believing and practicing object wholesale to the aims of fundementalists. I myself know only one person who does.

quote:

that much of what drives the minority is provoked by us


Hardly. It's driven by the last thousand years of Islamic tradition and by the internal desire for certain groups to maintain power. Saudi Arabia isn't a wahabbist dictatorship because the west made them that way. They are because Wahabbism is their own movement and after they took over, the west solidified their power by suporting them. The west has been negligent in its support for Islamist warlords and regimes, but it did not create the movement. And no oppression that the west might support is a reasonable motive for Islamism either.

If the Israelis are commiting genocide against the Palestinians, in reality it has no connection with why Pakistanis are throwing bombs in London or why Saudis and UAE citizens are crashing planes into US buildings. Pakistan is not hurt in any way by Israel, nor is SA, which is even more oppresive to palestinians than Israel is anyways.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:29:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Seeks i reject the fact that respect for the laws of the land makes people wishy washy. There is a distinct law that the security services are unable to bug MPs, this was broken.

Lets all play cricket in the corinthian spirit as the ship of social harmony slides slowly under the waves.We cant even win at cricket.!
I dont suppose it was mostly the MP that the intelligence services were interested in. Tho' nothing would surprise me.

Another point there is no  law it is an agreement formulated under H Wilson esq.




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:34:06 AM)

quote:

This still misses the point, there isnt a ground swell of support for either fundamentalism or Sharia law here in the UK. You have still not said if you live in the UK, and if you dont, how do you know what the Muslim community here is thinking ? 


Yes there is such support within kinds of Muslim communities. You conveniently disregarded surveys by making claims that do not hold against them. There is no evidence that those surveys are innacurate or outdated. Such surveys have been repeated many times in many areas and give the same results. A majority of practicing Sunni Muslims support Shariah law because that is what the Mosque tells them to believe. Support is greater or lesser depending on where people are originally from. Sufi Turkish Muslims for ex, are generally not big supporters of Islamic law.





hisannabelle -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:39:44 AM)

quote:

Fundementalist Islam is the dominant theological interpretation of Islam and the organized movement for what Islam is. There is no movement for whatever Islam happened to become in various cultures. There is certainly no movement for lacksadaisical practitioners of a religion.

It is not the western media's fault for focusing on fundementalist Islam. It is the inevitable result of the fact that Islamic extremism is an organized movement that seeks to takeover the muslim community and bring attention to itself. It is also the result of there being very little ideological revolt against fundementalism from other practicing muslims.

Hardly. It's driven by the last thousand years of Islamic tradition and by the internal desire for certain groups to maintain power. Saudi Arabia isn't a wahabbist dictatorship because the west made them that way. They are because Wahabbism is their own movement and after they took over, the west solidified their power by suporting them.


greetings kitttty,

i think the lack of sunni support for al-qaeda is an excellent example of what mainstream muslims think of fundamentalism. fundamentalism is not the dominant interpretation of islam. wahabbism denies both sufis and shi'a - so in reality we're talking about a small minority of sunnis who fall into the beliefs of wahabbism, which is the dominant fundamentalist ideology. considering that turkey suppresses islam, it doesn't surprise me that there are more atheists there.

if you look at colonial history, fundamentalism is primarily a result of colonialism. i'm not blaming muslim problems entirely on colonialism - don't get me wrong. we have our own problems, too, and many muslim leaders are causing the majority of the problems now. but wahabbism would not exist if it weren't for colonialism. likewise with the current issues in kenya and other areas of the world that have dealt with it.

the funny thing to me is how many people think islam is irreconcilable with egalitarianism - considering islam was an egalitarian social movement well before it was a monotheistic religious movement. all of the new movements of islam seek to return to that social ideal, it's just that too many of them have their own warped idea of what that is, and often it's based on bizarre interpretations and constructions of things that came hundreds of years after the revelation rather than the qur'an itself.

respectfully,
annabelle.




RealityLicks -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:46:51 AM)

There are so many persistent stereotypes out there.  We just have to hope that the ability to communicate doesn't get lost in all the irrational feelings and scaremongering.  Thoughtful and thought-provoking, annabelle, thanks. 




seeksfemslave -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:54:24 AM)

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/06/hitchens200706
quote:

Until he was jailed last year on charges of soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred, a man known to the police of several countries as Abu Hamza al-Masri was the imam of the Finsbury Park Mosque.


This man amongs other London based Mullahs? had been stirring up hatred since at least the late 1990's

If you select the link you will see a picture' of peace loving Muslims wishing to behead people with whom they dont agree a bit like RealityLicks wants to kill me. No judicial action of any kind was contempleted until the "gutter press" as characterised by sensitive naive intellectuals of the Williams type, though probably not specifically by him, kicked up an almighty fuss and several prosecutions followed.
Any deportations? I do not know.

quote:

In fact, the British jihadist is becoming quite a feature on the international scene. In 1998, six British citizens of Pakistani and North African descent along with two other British residents were arrested by the government of Yemen and convicted of planning to kidnap a group of tourists and attack British targets in the port of Aden (scene of the near-sinking of the U.S.S. Cole two years later). One of the youths was the son of the tireless Abu Hamza, and another was his stepson.


Note the Date Peace Lovers  1998




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 11:54:43 AM)

quote:

We just have to hope that the ability to communicate doesn't get lost in all the irrational feelings and scaremongering. Thoughtful and thought-provoking, annabelle, thanks.


But unfortunately not based on any facts whatsoever.




kitttty -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 12:02:43 PM)

quote:


greetings kitttty,

i think the lack of sunni support for al-qaeda is an excellent example of what mainstream muslims think of fundamentalism. fundamentalism is not the dominant interpretation of islam. wahabbism denies both sufis and shi'a - so in reality we're talking about a small minority of sunnis who fall into the beliefs of wahabbism, which is the dominant fundamentalist ideology. considering that turkey suppresses islam, it doesn't surprise me that there are more atheists there.


Wahabbism is mainly present in SA, but is not the only fundementalist ideology or even the most extreme ideology.

The problem is exactly that most Muslims have such extremely low standards for what extremism counts as. Of course most Muslims don't support Al Quaeda- Al Quaeda is so extreme that it thinks Saudi Arabia is too liberal. Al Quaeda wants the Taliban to rule the Earth. Just because Muslims don't support something as unsustainable as Al Quaeda, does not mean that they do not support extremism.

quote:

but wahabbism would not exist if it weren't for colonialism.


No one can know that for sure.

quote:


the funny thing to me is how many people think islam is irreconcilable with egalitarianism - considering islam was an egalitarian social movement well before it was a monotheistic religious movement. all of the new movements of islam seek to return to that social ideal, it's just that too many of them have their own warped idea of what that is, and often it's based on bizarre interpretations and constructions of things that came hundreds of years after the revelation rather than the qur'an itself.


This is a VERY dangersous belief that immediately leads into extremism. The belief that change is the corrupting influence and that Islam was 100% perfect as it was revealed in the 7th century and should never change. This is exactly the literal extremism that has overtaken the Muslim world today- you have at least partially bought into it.

It is also erroneous to believe that the west thinks that Islam is not an egalitarian movement. Islam, in its own way is egalitarian and has always been, but traditional Islam and Shariah is still not compatible with standards of human rights which are now possible in the modern world.

But that is what the Mosque teaches to say to people to manipulate them- "They say Islam is not egalitarian! But it is!"

Yes, it is. And that detracts from the myriad of other problems and injustices there are in their interpretation of Islam.




MrRodgers -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 12:07:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

This is Darcy (climbing onto his soapbox, so be warned.....)

The Archbishop of Cantebury Rowan Williams has said in an interview with BBC Radio 4's World At One programme that the adoption of Islamic Sharia law is unavoidable in the UK.

He goes on to say that the UK has to face up to the fact that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system.

Full story here.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7232661.stm

Your friendly neighbourhood Devil's Advocate,
Darcy


Suffice it to say, for the sake of the UK at least...the Archbishop had better be wrong.




Politesub53 -> RE: Sharia law 'unavoidable' in UK says Archbishop (2/9/2008 12:08:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

quote:

This still misses the point, there isnt a ground swell of support for either fundamentalism or Sharia law here in the UK. You have still not said if you live in the UK, and if you dont, how do you know what the Muslim community here is thinking ? 


Yes there is such support within kinds of Muslim communities. You conveniently disregarded surveys by making claims that do not hold against them. There is no evidence that those surveys are innacurate or outdated. Such surveys have been repeated many times in many areas and give the same results. A majority of practicing Sunni Muslims support Shariah law because that is what the Mosque tells them to believe. Support is greater or lesser depending on where people are originally from. Sufi Turkish Muslims for ex, are generally not big supporters of Islamic law.




One survey is 4 years old, the other was taken, as i have already side, at the time of the Danish cartoons. Both surveys you posted were taken from 500 people. Not exactly a large survey. The link i posted, showing current thinking in the UK, is at least current.

You have taken your argument from the UK, to world wide, like a Thomas Cook tour. Yet still havent said how you are qualified to know how Muslims in the UK think. Yet again i will repeat myself, there is no ground swell ( IE popular ) support in the UK for either Sharia law or fundamentalism. I agree there is some support, just as racism has some support but in general, i dont see it.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625