RCdc
Posts: 8674
Status: offline
|
This is Darcy (climbing onto his soapbox, so be warned.....) The Archbishop of Cantebury Rowan Williams has said in an interview with BBC Radio 4's World At One programme that the adoption of Islamic Sharia law is unavoidable in the UK. He goes on to say that the UK has to face up to the fact that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system. Full story here.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7232661.stm Now, call me old fashioned, but as far as I'm concerned the laws of a country are there to be obeyed, not to be cherry-picked selectively as to which ones may or may not suit your lifestyle or religion. I'm as welcoming and open-minded as anybody when it comes to different cultures, religions, creeds, sexualities, whatever else it may be that defines your individualilty, but I find the notion of changing the laws in this country just because certain members of society do not relate to them to be grossly offensive. If you don't agree with the laws of a particular country, then the simple answer is to go and live in another one where the legal system is more to your liking. This point of view has nothing to do with whether you are English, or British, or whether you were born here or not, but whether you are willing to conform to the stated laws of a country. I would never consider living in Saudi Arabia, for example, because I like to consume alcohol, and I respect the fact that outside of certain designated areas, this is forbidden, and punishable, by law over there. So, therefore Saudi isn't the place for me. There is also the (perhaps slightly paranoid) issue of how far these changes for those who are inconvenienced by certain of our laws will go. Say we allow polygamous marriages (currently illegal under bigamy laws, but nevertheless tolerated, which is another argument for another day) - how long before other laws concerning issues which certain sections of society do not relate to are passed, such as perhaps the repealing of the 1967 Sexual Offences Act, which would have the effect of once again effectively criminalising homosexuality? And then what? Stoning and flogging for adultery? Cutting off hands for shoplifting? Yes, I'm being extreme and slightly facetious with these examples, but I don't think laws should be changed just because somebody can't relate to them. (I can't relate to having to give up over 40% of my paycheck to the taxman, but I can't see them helping me out on this one. ) What do you think? Should we change laws just because they are inconvenient to somebody's culture and religion? Or should we stand firm that these are the laws of this country, and that if you don't like them then feel free to relocate to somewhere that has a more compatible legal system with your beliefs? Your friendly neighbourhood Devil's Advocate, Darcy
_____________________________
RC&dc love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction
|