Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Astrology


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Astrology Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 4:46:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Mnot, if you are a scientific athiest, what could your thoughts possibly be other than the byproduct of Chemical Reactions?

It would not be predetermined by either you or me, but by the operation of the Universe, going back in a chain of predictable events to the instant of creation. 



Well--- for me the truth is somewhere in there, I agree wholeheartedly with chemical reactions.

Predetermination now... I suppose if you wanna call it that.  I resolve the does god play dice like this.  Yes, he does (for convenience we will call that thing god and also him) the thing is that there (is in my mind) indisputable proof that the universe will indeed fall back unto itself into a singularity and explode again.

Here is how god plays dice.  In the fullness of time from singularity to maximum expansion, he plays every game, every combination.  Time begins and ends with me, thats me.  Time begins and ends with you, thats you.

So while there is an eventual endgame of determinism, nobody knows what roll of the dice we are on.

Ron

(lol, you can kick my ass?  is that all you got out of it?)     

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 5:13:15 AM   
lilabbotsfordgrl


Posts: 140
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
"Astrology: Careful observations, fuzzy thinking and pious fraud." - Carl Sagan

(in reply to verysweet)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 5:46:05 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
Well, tell me, Luckydog, when did I ever assert/profess a belief in any supernatural beings, or beings from other planes? Don't be twisting my words, I'm not going to let you get way with that, either.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 5:49:31 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

I haven't confused anything with anything. I'm an atheist. Don't presume to tell me what I believe.


Don't be silly...everyone has to believe what Strawd...errr.. Luckydog says they believe, or else what would he have to argue about?
I have been shown the error of my ways. TY, Komrade.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:29:20 AM   
Nineveh


Posts: 1299
Joined: 2/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nineveh

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Andrew, many, If not all, Athiests believe in an absolute predetermination.  It logically follows that every event, down to the thoughts in our heads, are just physical reactions.  The universe is just a giant machine operating from its start point.  Scientists don't see messages in the stars about it, but generally are 100% deterministic.

Not that I am defending Astrology.  I suspect telling people since they are small children, "you are a scorpio and scorpios are...", has a degree of psychological impact.
Really? Are you an atheist? What do you mean by "predetermination?" How do you know scientists are "100% deterministic"?

I have seen you do this twice now, postulating some horseshit premise, and then doing the "it logically follows that..." schtick.

First off, do you know most atheists? Have they personally told you what they think about "predeterminism"? (do you mean predestination? That event a ---> event b ----> event 200034A, thus there is causality for N-1 events?)
Now, atheism is not having a belief in a deity. (it is NOT having a belief that there is NOT a deity.) Not having a belief in a deity does not exclude believing in beings from other planes of existence which may influence events in this plane.
If a being from another plane influences an event in this plane, is there a direct physical causal chain from the event preceding it? Of course not. (there are other problems with this example, but they are outside the scope of this discussion)
Then the statement "It logically follows that..." is not true.

At any rate, I consider Astrology to be nonsence.


I think you may have confused Atheism with Agnosticism.  Agnostics don't have a belief in a diety, or belief in any other concrete concepts of that nature such as the lack of a diety.  Atheists generally have faith in the lack of a diety.


I haven't confused anything with anything. I'm an atheist. Don't presume to tell me what I believe.


Sure, you can call yourself whatever you like.  I can call myself a Celtic Druid if I want, but if I define that in a different way than the majority of Celtic Druids I am, perhaps, being a bit deceptive in my self description.  That's why, despite the fact that my belief system has some things in common with Celtic Druidism, I do not call myself that. 

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:35:04 AM   
Nineveh


Posts: 1299
Joined: 2/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: batshalom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nineveh

I would be interested to see you cite some of these sources that disprove astrology as I suspect that you may simply be carrying the prejudices that you hgave developed over without actually having read studies that disprove astrological theory.



It is not up to the questioner to prove or disprove. It is always up to the claimant to prove. The supernatural can't be touched by science - it isn't falsifiable. All one has to do is say "Oh, this is the hand of god at work" (or whatever) and how can that be disproven?

If it is a truism, it should be generalizable for any given person. If studies can show that it is accurate and able to be replicated, I'm all for it. Otherwise, it's a fun novelty but I wouldn't stake my rent on it.


The OP was the claimant.  He claimed that Astrology is a bunch of nonsense.  he also cited the scientific studies that demonstrated this sufficiently to convince him of this fact after i asked him to.

(in reply to batshalom)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:37:28 AM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
Could just site the newspaper horrorscopes and the fact that people don't tend to have different sorts of events happen to them so broadly based on the time of the year that they were born.  That's a pretty quick KO.

(in reply to Nineveh)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:41:36 AM   
Nineveh


Posts: 1299
Joined: 2/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Could just site the newspaper horrorscopes and the fact that people don't tend to have different sorts of events happen to them so broadly based on the time of the year that they were born.  That's a pretty quick KO.


Sure, if anyone had actually stepped up to defend the newspaper horoscopes.  Also, his issue was with the idea of personality determination based on Horoscopes (I'm a  scorpio therefore I am stubborn) not prediction of events (I'm a Scorpio therefore I am going to fall in love today)  These are two very different facets of Astrology and even if it is not a useful tool to predict the future it may be a useful tool to predict personality traits.  (Also, if it is not obvious I am grossly oversimplifying the two facets to make them accessible to someone who's understanding of astrology extends no further than newspaper horoscopes.)

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:46:12 AM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
It's cool.  I buy the idea that personality is based in the stars just about as much as I buy that black people are supposed to be poor.  Hell, the latter even has scientific coorelation.  They're just prejustices, after all.  Not necessarily bad ones, but as long as people are told things that they want to hear..

(in reply to Nineveh)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 9:47:05 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

Sure, you can call yourself whatever you like.  I can call myself a Celtic Druid if I want, but if I define that in a different way than the majority of Celtic Druids I am, perhaps, being a bit deceptive in my self description.  That's why, despite the fact that my belief system has some things in common with Celtic Druidism, I do not call myself that. 


Mob rule, hmmmm? 
Atheism is a category of no belief in a deity, per the literal definition of the word (note the ism/ist part). 

If someone says they have no belief system period, then they fall into the category mentioned above.
How can anyone presume to tell them they have to believe in something to be an atheist?

(in reply to Nineveh)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 11:25:35 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Hippie, you said,

"Not having a belief in a deity does not exclude believing in beings from other planes of existence which may influence events in this plane.
If a being from another plane influences an event in this plane, is there a direct physical causal chain from the event preceding it? Of course not. (there are other problems with this example, but they are outside the scope of this discussion)
Then the statement "It logically follows that..." is not true. "

Now you say you don't think this, so its just nonsense youthrew out, because you couldn't come up with any vaild way of arguing the point I made? I will keep in mind that your posts are meaningless in the future, if you like.

Please find me one scientific athiest who believes there are other planes of existance, with beings in them.  There are so many problems with your example.  Are these other Planes natural or supernatural?  If they are natural, Natural (scientific Law) applies there, and it is just as determined as our lane.  Or if the other planes are supernatural...then one believes in the supernatural, and is not an Athiest, but a Thiest.

So if there are other planes (with activist beings) believed in by athiests, my statement is not true.  But not a single Athiest is willing to stand up and say they believe in beings from other planes affecting events in ours.


But basically I keep asking and no one is going to even attempt to make an answer.  Within the context of Scientific Athiesm, what force other than scientific laws causes anything to hapen.  Within the Context of SA, what are the thoughts in your but Chemical reactions occuring in predictable ways.  How can you or anything have free will (you get the appearance of free will, for practical purposes we seem to have it, but really don't)?

Pages of people getting mad and name calling, but no one will offer up a force that could cause free will.  Except for beings from another plane.  Is there any evidence that beings from another plane are intervening in your brain...scientifically no, religiously absolutly.  Plus if thought is affected by intervention by extra planal beings, it can't be considered free will.

Mnot, so I got you agreeing wholeheartedly with the root of my argument...good, good, good.
Theres hope for you yet. 

But why would you think all I got out the post in question was ass kicking.  I got you to agree with me. 

Dice aren't random.  If you controll all the variables in the throw, you get the same result everytime.  In Vegas rules you have to put the dice in the cup and bounce them off the back wall of the craps table, because people can learn to throw them with a degree off accuracy that beats the house. 



(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 12:06:31 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
I would rather be a witch than a Druid. I met one witch...She sucked and I'm fairly confident that she was representative of all witches...Druids?? What in the fuck is a Druid?

Why not make something completely up? Druid....lol.

I'm a Moderationist.

_____________________________



(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 12:09:55 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
A Druid's a little bit like a Dude, only more so.

_____________________________



(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 12:41:12 PM   
Nineveh


Posts: 1299
Joined: 2/5/2008
Status: offline
I'm a Lopezian Pagan.  Druid was just an example of something that I'm not that I might claim to be since nobody knows what a Lopezian Pagan is.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:02:20 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1



"Determinism is the philosophical proposition that every event, including human cognition and behavior, decision and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences. Determinism may also be defined as the thesis that there is at any instant exactly one physically possible future.[1] With numerous historical debates, many varieties and philosophical positions on the subject of determinism exist from traditions throughout the world.  "

Nothing about Jehova, God or Judeo Christian beliefs are included in determinism at all, despite your assertions.  What I am proposing is a valid recognized school of thought.  I have asked several times for any Athiest to give anything that could contradict it, and so far the only one is beings from another plane


Since it was all created by man than it all falls into being part of the pattern...End of story...It is all rather simple...Next subject.

If this is your argument to justify your belief in a higher power...You are going to Hell. How weak.


_____________________________



(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:10:44 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feric

Astrology, like any pseudo-science, offers vague reassurances and is totally credible to those who want to believe in it. It offers a shortcut to quick answers and a background of hundreds of years of believers who prefer to follow star patterns than logic. A lot of people believe in astrology because they want to. That's the nature of free will, and it's not something that can be easily explained.

However, in my humble opinion, I consider astrology dangerously seductive because it's a quick way to abdicate responsibility for your actions: "I'm not to blame because my destiny is written in the stars." I think a lot of people can fool themselves this way, at least until their crimes or mistakes become too great.


Astrology pseudo-science?

So what causes the tides to rise and fall? The world spinning too fast and creating waves in the ocean? Is it not through the phases of the Moon?

So what about magnets? How can magnetism stick two bits of metal together? Some sort of invisible glue?

This is astrology - the science of electro-magnetic energy fields and their effects on living organisms and physical matter.

The cerebellum in the brain is a fine receptor of these electro-magnetic force fields.

There's also something called reality, and something else called perception.

You not understanding astrology doesn't make it a 'pseudo-science'. It just means you don't understand astrology.

However you are entitled to your opinion just the same as everyone else here.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to Feric)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:16:05 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Domi, you seem incapable of following a discussion.  Feel free to show me anywhere that I am am using this to justify my belief in a higher power.  

Better yet show me where I am wrong on this topic.  If you show me wrong, I  (and anyone reading this thread) will have learned something.  But I keep asking for anyone to give me any sort of evidence showing I am not right.  Lots of people respond, but with snide insults, deliberate mis understanding, and pride.  None with reasonable possible answers.  (I just have to say the Athiest who believes in Beings from supernatural planes, isn't a reasonable possible answer). 

So if no one can give me any sort of reasonable alternative, I have to assume I am right.   Right?

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:29:49 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
What you are talking about is simply free will. It has nothing to do with ones views... Either you have free will or not. Being a devout atheist or Pat Roberston doesn't stop the bullets when you are standing around the NIU campus. I don't get the logic.

It's a meaningless argument when all is said and done...Chicken or the egg? I don't care to revisit my college philosophy course...I wasn't overly impressed then.

"That means that...our whole solar system...could be, like...one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being.

This is too much! That means...one tiny atom in my fingernail could be--Could be one little...tiny universe.

Could l buy some pot from you?"

_____________________________



(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:34:04 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
No domi guy I don't sell pot on line....

Actually the solar system is an atom in a fingernail....theory is nonsense.  The behavior of Solar Systems in nothing like what we observe in the behavior of Atoms. 

I am confused,  if you can't comprehend the discussion, and don't care why are you yapping at me? 

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Astrology - 2/15/2008 1:49:43 PM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

I would rather be a witch than a Druid. I met one witch...She sucked and I'm fairly confident that she was representative of all witches...



Didn't you get turned into a toad for saying this on another thread already? I don't have an endless supply of antidote for you to guzzle, man. Best measure your words more carefully. (BTW - only the first one was free.)

Lucky - so now we are playing dueling-definitions? The definition I provided, including the integral matter of a controlling deity, is every bit as valid as the one you offer. I didn't ask for a WWW definition, I asked for your definition. Your method of holding definitions in abeyance until it suits you to spring your chosen one on the world, is getting tiresome, as are the rest of your intellectually dishonest methods.

If you want to discuss things to improve our shared understanding, I'm all for it. But if you just want to win by pounding ideas over the net with as much spin as you can muster, then I'll concede the apparent victory you seek. It's not worth the effort to swing back.


Z.


BTW - you still haven't even come close to defending predeterminism. It's your assertion - better get busy.


< Message edited by Zensee -- 2/15/2008 1:52:28 PM >


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Astrology Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078