ownedgirlie
Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterLDesade SinergyNStrumpet , In B.D.S.M what do these words mean ? . Discipline involves teaching this implies you are receiving training . Your Master must be initiating such a system or you are not in a D/S relationship and certain key elements must be there for this D/S relationship to exist . So there is a base line in training , which is exhibited by the the very dynamic D/S otherwise you are a vanilla trying to tell B.D.S.M "How to make a new wheel " & failing to recognize what world you are in . Your personal standard of training is only a reflection of how seriously you take where you are & its importance in reference to yourself , to me this is a personal reflection of the Standard of my Mastery and ability's and state of learning . Meaning where i am at at that particular time in my journey . Universal it is not you say , yet i bet you put on the " Dog " & do the look at me how well trained am i in public play or scenes you attend in this world , who's well trained now " Sigh " . Otherwise you would not be acceptable at any event or function , simple as that . The Mistress's collum has a current thread in relation to whom posts where . And if the authority of Mod11 is all you respect in here then per say this would not be a Master's Collum but Mod11's collum & your thought pattern on that is disturbing . Regards MasterLDesade Perhaps it is my mood today, but I've been watching some exchanges here and feel inspired to comment on this, despite strumpet's ability to speak for herself. I am not intending to speak for her here, but this post was fraught with several things I wish to address. First, not everyone who partakes in a D/s relationship engages in BDSM, either partially or totally. In this post you seem to assume that the two go hand in hand, when in actuality they do not. Many D/s relationships have no interest in BDSM and many BDSM relationships have no interest in D/s. Also, to speak to a submissive in someone else's relationship in such a way as to define how she views her particular standard of education within that relationship is, in my opinion, proposterous. Unless of course you have intimate first hand knowledge of how her dominant (and in strumpet's case, she does not have a "Master") views the relationship and his short and long term goals for it. I am also curious about your "I bet you put on...." comment and why you feel so enlightened as to how someone you do not know conducts herself. Unless of course I misunderstood your comment, as it was not very well constructed and therefore a bit confusing to the reader. As to who posts where, it has been made clear on many occasions within the various forums here, that anyone is free to post on any forum. There was a rather colorful discussion some months back, in fact, in which some dominants on the "Ask a Master" forum were critical about submissives and slaves posting here, even when such submissives and slaves (myself included) had insightful information to share on behalf of their dominants. Ironically enough, several of those dominants in protest had submissives who were also posting on this board. Go figure. I wonder, though, as you feel strongly about the etiquette of who posts where, why you have posted advice on the Mistress forum. Finally, and this is just a pet peeve of mine which I very rarely comment on these boards. But it is my opinion that when one chooses to chide another about behavior, conduct and the way in which the other's relationship is lived out, said critic would have more credibility if he or she spelled correctly: baseline, abilities, periods immediately following a word and not one space away, periods not following a question mark, etc. I realize this is petty and outside the norm of how I usually post here, but I think if one decides himself to be authorized to decide the submission of another in her relationship, he should do so with full credibility.
|