ownedgirlie -> RE: The Quality of a Master (3/10/2008 2:03:58 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: need2bused6 Respectfully I ask this question to see if it is a trend. I have been running into "Masters" who appear to have little or poor training. I know just because a Man calls himself a Master doesn't make them one. I have been meeting a much lower quality of "Masters" than usual. Is this a trend or have I just been lucky? From my point of view it is harder and harder to find a good Master, or Mistress, in public settings their behavior, and that of their subs, have a lack of basic social skills is appalling. I see Masters that I know just wince at some of the actions. I know no Master can be the police of manners but has anyone one else noticed this? s seem In all walks of life there are strong leaders and poor leaders. You can see it in business management, in military management, in volunteer organizations, etc. The best leader is one whose goal is to bring out the best in others, and whose motivation brings him/her to seek the best ways of doing so. Even still, the world is made up of a plethora of values and views on what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Often times this is influence by our upbringing, then again sometimes, not. My siblings and I were raised with what some considered rather strict ediquette. Two out of five of us still practice such manners. Personality and self values come into play when it comes to how we conduct ourselves in public. Expecting everyone to behave as we expect ourselves to behave is going to bring about disappointment. While it is natural to be impressed or unimpressed by the behavior of others, we can use that behavior to measure ourselves against, and focus on self refinement if that is important to us. Submissives are only as reflective of their dominants as they are influenced by them. The first year I belonged to my Master, I was hardly a reflection of his training and influence. My fourth year as his slave, I am much more reflective of such.
|
|
|
|