RE: Moderators

RE: Moderators (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

kc692 -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 11:52:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 Possibly because the second person listened the first time around, and didn't persist in doing things "their way" as your friend did? Also, safe to say the second person didn't sneak back on the boards not one but 3 times under other user nicks made up that I alone am aware of. Kinda hard to make friends and influence people with that behavior, and kind of hard to make the moderators or the administration of the site want to give that poster a second chance, when they continuously try to circumvent the rules. Gotta give the site credit, they are never very successful for long.[;)] You have no idea what I am referring to. Also,why are you airing information like this and how are you privy to it? [Mod Note: please trim your replies] I have every idea what you are referring to, because if you remember, YOU emailed me personally about it. We actually had discussion back and forth, you and I, lots of it....... Now, If I am airing information that is erroneous, then how is it I have no idea, and if erroneous, why would it matter what I aired? Your buddy (in the generic sense)would know what I was talking about, and apparently so did you. edited to add: Unlike them, I have broken no TOS here, I did not name a user, and I even used the term generic...so, actually, if I have no idea what you are referring to, it would stand to reason that you must know what I mean or be privy to. Please don't act like I am the offender here, I have not been banned, nor do I sneak back on the boards under other nicks...neither do you, so, unless you air the specifics and break TOS yourself, I definitely will not cross that line. edited to add: 1) As long as I do not break TOS, I have the right to speak my mind. So do you. Just don't feel bad if we don't agree, and if someone gets upset because I speak the truth, please refer back to 1).

Jeffff -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 11:57:01 AM)
I am gonna laugh my skinny ass off if some one gets modded for something said on this thread...:) Jeff Edited for typing

LaTigresse -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 11:58:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff I am gonna laugh my skinny ass off if some one gets modded for something siad on this thread...:) Jeff I was just thinking the EXACT same thing! (cept my arse isn't skinny)

kittinSol -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 11:59:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff I am gonna laugh my skinny ass off if some one gets modded for something said on this thread...:) Skinny ass, that's what you say - we demand proof.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:00:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 Possibly because the second person listened the first time around, and didn't persist in doing things "their way" as your friend did? Also, safe to say the second person didn't sneak back on the boards not one but 3 times under other user nicks made up that I alone am aware of. Kinda hard to make friends and influence people with that behavior, and kind of hard to make the moderators or the administration of the site want to give that poster a second chance, when they continuously try to circumvent the rules. Gotta give the site credit, they are never very successful for long.[;)] You have no idea what I am referring to. Also,why are you airing information like this and how are you privy to it? [Mod Note: please trim your replies] I have every idea what you are referring to, because if you remember, YOU emailed me personally about it. We actually had discussion back and forth, you and I, lots of it....... Now, If I am airing information that is erroneous, then how is it I have no idea, and if erroneous, why would it matter what I aired? Your buddy (in the generic sense)would know what I was talking about, and apparently so did you. edited to add: Unlike them, I have broken no TOS here, I did not name a user, and I even used the term generic...so, actually, if I have no idea what you are referring to, it would stand to reason that you must know what I mean or be privy to. Please don't act like I am the offender here, I have not been banned, nor do I sneak back on the boards under other nicks...neither do you, so, unless you air the specifics and break TOS yourself, I definitely will not cross that line. I am not acting like you are the offender. What I am referring to happened well after that. but my wondering was how you would have first hand and verifiable information of someone sneaking back onto the boards?

kittinSol -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:00:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff I am gonna laugh my skinny ass off if some one gets modded for something siad on this thread...:) Jeff I was just thinking the EXACT same thing! (cept my arse isn't skinny) Proof, please.

LadyRainfire -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:03:03 PM)
perks at the thought of Jeff's ass .... [:D]

LaTigresse -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:03:47 PM)
Of the size of my arse?!?! You mean, you're gonna make me hijack a thread about moderators (for shame) to describe the humonnnnnnnnnngeous white vista that is my winter sized ass? You are going to get us all placed on [ awaiting approval][:D]

kittinSol -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:06:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Of the size of my arse?!?! You mean, you're gonna make me hijack a thread about moderators (for shame) to describe the humonnnnnnnnnngeous white vista that is my winter sized ass? You are going to get us all placed on [ awaiting approval][:D] Moi? Far from me the thought of making you trip into a trap, Tigresse! You know I like you far too much for that. No, I was trying to divert the conversation temporarily to more palatable pastures. Before resuming the scheduled program. Alli Teration.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:07:28 PM)
Look guys. i really enjoy these boards. I enjoy the debates and differeing opinions. I am not posting my opinions to try to stir up old junk. It would not have been mentioned if someone had not posted a thread on it. maybe the OP didnt know the can of worms it opens but with threads we cant just have one opinion and everyone else afraid to voice to the contrary.

stef -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:12:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 What I am referring to happened well after that. but my wondering was how you would have first hand and verifiable information of someone sneaking back onto the boards? You mean the person who was stupid enough to keep creating accounts with "red" and/or "sexy" in the name and acted exactly the same? You don't need to be Lord Peter Wimsey to figure out that mystery. ~stef

LaTigresse -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:13:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Of the size of my arse?!?! You mean, you're gonna make me hijack a thread about moderators (for shame) to describe the humonnnnnnnnnngeous white vista that is my winter sized ass? You are going to get us all placed on [ awaiting approval][:D] Moi? Far from me the thought of making you trip into a trap, Tigresse! You know I like you far too much for that. No, I was trying to divert the conversation temporarily to more palatable pastures. Before resuming the scheduled program. Alli Teration. Your right.........I am on the verge of moving from my comfy fat jeans (14) into my really comfy really fat jeans (16) when I should be at my summer relaxing 10 or 12. Mooooooooorrrrrrre running, lessssssssss chocolate! Definately more palatable.[:D] wide arse and all.

domahpet -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:14:55 PM)
whats this mean??? [Mod Note: please trim your replies]

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:21:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 What I am referring to happened well after that. but my wondering was how you would have first hand and verifiable information of someone sneaking back onto the boards? You mean the person who was stupid enough to keep creating accounts with "red" and/or "sexy" in the name and acted exactly the same? You don't need to be Lord Peter Wimsey to figure out that mystery. ~stef Actually, I dont assume things just by a name. Unless I have proof positive. I dont think SexyRed . Who is an intelligent career women would be that stupid as to be that transparent. I am sure she would use some unrelated name as to avoid detection. I dont know, maybe I'm wrong. But I just have a hard time believing that. But there has got to be a way to track to make sure you are not shutting down the wrong people.

Jeffff -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:25:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 What I am referring to happened well after that. but my wondering was how you would have first hand and verifiable information of someone sneaking back onto the boards? You mean the person who was stupid enough to keep creating accounts with "red" and/or "sexy" in the name and acted exactly the same? You don't need to be Lord Peter Wimsey to figure out that mystery. ~stef LOL......... and then come into a "mod thread" and bash........oops? Jeff

kc692 -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:29:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote: ORIGINAL: stef quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 What I am referring to happened well after that. but my wondering was how you would have first hand and verifiable information of someone sneaking back onto the boards? You mean the person who was stupid enough to keep creating accounts with "red" and/or "sexy" in the name and acted exactly the same? You don't need to be Lord Peter Wimsey to figure out that mystery. ~stef Actually, I dont assume things just by a name. Unless I have proof positive. I dont think SexyRed . Who is an intelligent career women would be that stupid as to be that transparent. I am sure she would use some unrelated name as to avoid detection. I dont know, maybe I'm wrong. But I just have a hard time believing that. But there has got to be a way to track to make sure you are not shutting down the wrong people. Ok, see, now I will ask you, how do you know other people have been shut down and that they aren't the right person unless someone told you their account was shut down........rflmao..ah what tangled webs we weave.....(whispers, btw, 67 is a good flag too...let's see if anyone knows what that means on here) edited to add : YOu are correct though, one would think that in fact "Who is an intelligent career women would be that stupid as to be that transparent. I am sure she would use some unrelated name as to avoid detection. ". Must mean she thinks the site's run by idiots, if in fact it was her.......I don't know, however you seem to. edited to add yet again: I don't see anywhere on the thread where a moderator said they killed any accounts....do you know something we don't know?

kittinSol -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:31:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff LOL......... and then come into a "mod thread" and bash........oops? I'm just glad I wasn't hallucinating [:D] .

stef -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:31:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff LOL......... and then come into a "mod thread" and bash........oops? Do ghosts count? ~stef

Jeffff -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:32:17 PM)
Frankly, mist nailed it....... any thing else is.... sound and fury, signifying nothing Jeff

xxblushesxx -> RE: Moderators (3/13/2008 12:32:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist No one...ABSOLUTLY NO ONE...is forcing ANYONE to stay here and be subjected to what THEY feel is biased moderation. How do you know?!!![&:] Perhaps my evil HoneyMaster ties me to a chair every day and makes me... Call it chat torture...

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.100586E-02