Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 1:40:54 PM   
Shawn1066


Posts: 987
Joined: 10/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

BTW I don't just scene...I live this D/s thing too...and service...every fuckin day. It's not about playing. Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.


This is very true.  When certain submissives claim to love service, they're rarely thinking about doing dishes, taking out the trash, or scrubbing interesting stains off of shelves.


---

Also, in response to a few posts up...  BDSM is just as real...or as fake...as anything else.  It depends on the relationship, the people involved, and the dynamic.  You seem to believe it's nothing more than role play.  That's certainly true for some people, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.  For other people, it's not role play at all.  It's just what they are and how their relationship dynamic is.  They never turn off.  If my relationship with my Owner is roleplay, then every single thing in my life--or anybody else's--is roleplay.

I just think it's incorrect to say that BDSM is not real life.  Some isn't.  Some is. Just like everything else, in my opinion.

I do agree it's good to not have one aspect of your life take over entirely, though.  That's very important to remember.

DV's Fox

< Message edited by Shawn1066 -- 3/17/2008 1:42:16 PM >

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 1:58:17 PM   
SinergyNstrumpet


Posts: 305
Joined: 2/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.


I do my Daddy's dishes any time he asks me to, but many people that live this 24-7 do not demand dish washing as a service to prove someone is submissive to them. My former dominant lived 2000 miles away from me, and while we interacted in the real world, I did not wash his dishes much. I did a lot of online research for him though. In fact it was a service he missed as little as a year ago when he emailed me asking me if I would write articles for his site... so not all "service" has to be in person, nor does all of it require physical labor.

Most of the time Daddy has a maid that does his menial tasks for him, in fact even when we live together he wants to keep the maid because he believes that our free time is better spent doing the fun things he enjoys. I serve him best by being his companion, talking with him, playing games, and debating things... it is what he wants a submissive for... and many of those things do not require my physical presense. The sexual ones do, but the mental ones I can do wherever I am.


julia

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:14:12 PM   
junecleaver


Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/6/2005
Status: offline
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Yeah I tend to not like those types of people either.

BTW I don't just scene...I live this D/s thing too...and service...every fuckin day. It's not about playing. Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.


Isn't it about whatever makes you look cool and real?  You have a lot of standards for people to live by.  You dictate who is really submissive, dominant, top, and bottom.  And you even get to say if someone is gay or not.  I think 99% of us are untrue.  1% seems like it would get lonely and a little crowded in the 'rweal' world of BDSM.

Ownedgirlie has provided some great examples of service she has provided using a computer like making spreadsheets, planning travel, and I think (I could be wrong please correct me if I am) her master can watch her at home using camera via the internet?  Personal preference here, but I'd rather wash dishes lol

I don't actually expect a response to this post, but I'd love to hear you answer julia's question.


_____________________________


"No one will ever win the battle of the sexes; there's too much fraternizing with the enemy. "
--Henry A. Kissinger

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:35:26 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
Omega.....and If this person continues to come in and never knits a cozy, but yet they are full of advice on knitting, do you take them seriously?

(in reply to OmegaG)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:39:28 PM   
junecleaver


Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/6/2005
Status: offline
The important question....does crocheting count?

_____________________________


"No one will ever win the battle of the sexes; there's too much fraternizing with the enemy. "
--Henry A. Kissinger

(in reply to MasterWilliam55)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:39:47 PM   
SinergyNstrumpet


Posts: 305
Joined: 2/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

This is very true. When certain submissives claim to love service, they're rarely thinking about doing dishes, taking out the trash, or scrubbing interesting stains off of shelves.


For some people this type of service would be a complete and utter waste to their dominant. I actually find housework relaxing, easy and non challenging. It is something that if I am staying somewhere I do for me. I do not do those tasks for a dominant, I like things to be nice where I am.

Some of us have talents that have much more use to our dominant. I refinished my Daddy's frontroom furniture while I was down there last because I was there for weeks making sure he was ok post op. Now he found my washing his dishes of great service too, but I do that anywhere I eat....


julia

(in reply to Shawn1066)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:54:21 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

BTW I don't just scene...I live this D/s thing too...and service...every fuckin day. It's not about playing. Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.


Oh right, so I take it you're submissive (or dominant) with anyone or anybody who comes into your life, right? Employers..family, friends, so tell me, when you visit a doctor do you do his dishes as well?

Or are we more talking here about a 24/7 relationship with a major D/s component?

So okay, whoopee shit, I'm happy for you, and I do sincerely mean that. But what is it you're expecting here? A medal? Some sort of prize? A round of applause? Lifetime membership in the One True Way Club?

So let me ask you then about all those people who aren't as fortunate to be able to 'live it' as you say 24/7 - what about them? Are they all fake? Pretending? Fantasists? What about those people who are separated from each other for whatever reason? What about those people who have just come out of relationships?

What about all those female submissives out there who spend many months, night after night, online, sat at a computer with their Dom on the other side, both working together to develop and build a successful, harmonious relationship? How many Mistresses out there collared their slaves after months of correspondence? Are these people fake too?

What would you say of some very good friends of mine who spent many months online developing a relationship? She's travelling Jamaica, the United States, and Canada, he's back here in Kent, she comes home, that was six years ago, and they are still together, and their relationship is as strong as ever. Are they fake just because they spent time fucking about on a computer?

It doesn't matter whether they're sitting beside each other on a two seater sofa or thousands and thousands of miles away connecting with each other by way of computer because he's human and she's human and because of this their relationship is just as real - it contains the same feelings, the same emotions, the words they exchange between each other carry the same meanings as they would spoken face to face.

Yes, nothing can beat real time experience and real life relationships, and whatever time is spent online is nothing more than a poor substitute, a placebo, nowhere near the real thing. Online contact is never really anything more than about 30% of the real thing, the feelings are the same, the emotions, the thoughts, but it's missing the most vital thing, the interaction, the physical intimacy

But just because there is no 70% it doesn't necessarily invalidate the remaining 30%.

Yeah, some people don't follow through, some people lie, some people let you down, and some people just don't have a clue. But isn't this true of life in general?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

Also, in response to a few posts up...  BDSM is just as real...or as fake...as anything else.  It depends on the relationship, the people involved, and the dynamic.  You seem to believe it's nothing more than role play.  That's certainly true for some people, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.  For other people, it's not role play at all.  It's just what they are and how their relationship dynamic is.  They never turn off.  If my relationship with my Owner is roleplay, then every single thing in my life--or anybody else's--is roleplay.



Though I do admit to making the statement that BDSM is a role play, it is usually more helpful to read and understand all what I write and not just pick at my postings selectively. This is just a point I wish to make in general, the misunderstanding here is my fault and is because I did make such a statement. I did however qualify it later on. Obviously I wasn't too successful.

However I will try and do so again. Many of the activities, interactions and rituals found in BDSM are based on a role assumed by both people in a relationship, but the role assumed is a role and is nothing more than an integral part of the relationship.

Therefore I don't seem to believe that it's nothing more than role play, but I don't see much difference between the submissive or dominant role, and say the role of a mother, a husband, a housewife, a servant, an employee, or an employer.

You and your Dominant are both people, you are both real people, the needs, wishes, desires and feelings which you both share in your relationship are as real as the kinks you share between each other. If the kinks weren't real, if the desire behind the kinks weren't real, or the desire to experience fulfillment of those needs or desires, there would be no motivation at all to assume either the dominant or submissive role in your relationship, or would there?

No Shawn, your relationship isn't a role play, it is a real, perfectly valid relationship just the same as any other relationship between anyone else. But then again is it really a vanilla relationship? Of course not, but a relationship based on the role of a submissive and Dominant, but the role itself is based on a real relationship between two people. Therefore both role and relationship are very much interwoven and connected to each other.

Let us not forget that a woman who marries a man, if they later have children, takes on the role of wife, and also of mother. Is she playing? No, not really, I very much doubt it, but she is assuming a role, is she not? She is approaching a relationship with another human (in this case a child, but everyone else too) in a specific manner and exhbiting a pattern of interaction and behaviour which would be deemed appropriate for a mother. Is she a mother? Why of course, but she's also a wife, she can also be a secretary, a daughter, a friend, a Dominatrix, a female submissive, whatever role she chooses to adopt with whoever for whatever reason.

If your relationship with your Dominant was just a role, then be sure that neither of you would have any value whatsoever to each other. You could be a submissive to any woman assuming the role of Dominant, and she could be a Dominant to any submissive who came her way. But I'm assuming you chose each other not because of your respective roles, but for who you really are deep inside.

If your relationship is just a relationship and doesn't involve a role of any sorts, then why can't you both find fulfillment with a vanilla relationship? Why do you feel the need to be submissive, and she feels the need to be dominant? These are roles which you assume between each other to fulfill needs, part of the intimacy, the whole relationship.

This is where I have a problem with the OP. It's not for the OP or me or anyone else for that matter to say whether your relationship, or anyone else's relationship for that matter is valid or not. It's not for me to question the presence of anyone here on these boards and to decide whether they are fake or real or not. It's got nothing to do with me, it's none of my business. Your relationship is between you and your Dominant, nobody else.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

I just think it's incorrect to say that BDSM is not real life.  Some isn't.  Some is. Just like everything else, in my opinion.



BDSM is a part of life, real life, Just as kink is - to me personally - a part of human nature. BDSM in itself isn't the same as real life, it is not a substitute for real life, and this is what I meant when I made that underlined statement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

I do agree it's good to not have one aspect of your life take over entirely, though.  That's very important to remember.

DV's Fox


Very true.

< Message edited by stella41b -- 3/17/2008 4:00:44 PM >


_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to Shawn1066)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 3:58:26 PM   
Lumus


Posts: 5968
Joined: 9/16/2007
Status: offline
I am not real.  I only exist through technology.

I do not affect you.

~ Bill Gates


_____________________________

<Talk to educate; listen to learn.>

~ the other half of "L&L" ~

I have been dubbed the Rainmaker. Do not make me take your water for my tribe.

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 5:58:34 PM   
rook42


Posts: 110
Joined: 10/2/2005
Status: offline
"If you see buddha on the side of the road, kill him."

Think too many capital letters are in use sometimes. Instead of hearing "I like to get beat", or "I'm in service to a wonderful woman", there's -uh oh- the capital T, capital L, "The Lifestyle". There are things you've done, do, like to do, would be willing to do, how you like your relationships structured... Finding others to share those interests with is great, as is a group identity; but it seems like there's a pressure there that shouldn't be, to be more proactively kinked. All the cool kids have freckles type of deal. Freckles and kink are both neutral(1), but people can be deluded into thinking otherwise. If people just avoided using heavily symbolic buzzwords, I think we'd be a lot better off. Tempted to just start saying I like women, and hurting people, when the typical questions pop up :P

Re: Relative safety of online that BoiJen mentioned others had argued:
Definitely not. Working from home, at my computer all day, I can empirically say that it does not feel healthy, at all(I'm sure this applies to a relationship as well as to business).  Sitting in a chair using a phone/computer for human contact is not a good thing. There's an extra layer between yourself and other brains, as well, via the phone/computer.
Of course, if I was stuck at home for a reason other than work, it would suck even greater- would not have ANY personal contact. The same situation can extrapolated to kink contact, although this is just an anecdote. One would hope, however, that illogical justifications wouldn't prevent someone from "taking the plunge" by interacting in the real world.
It seems that ANY time someone has a disagreement with someone's way of things, counterarguments are either character attacks or attacks on the "safety" of others' activities. Even commonplace mundane activities; it seems a bit ridiculous. As such, I'll just say that online play would kill me, and not say that it's unhealthy for everyone. Risk assessment is great, knowledge is good, but my ears are going to start bleeding if I hear the word safety out of context a couple more times.

(1):
No, kink is not "good" any more than gay or straight are- the whole not-vanilla supremacy thing is hogwash. Just because someone is boring or uncomfortable with some of your activities, does not make them inferior. Start endorsing your way as the one true path (tm), and you open yourself to the majority's arguments on how to live. Not exactly the ideal state of affairs for deviants.

(in reply to SinergyNstrumpet)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 6:01:29 PM   
SinergyNstrumpet


Posts: 305
Joined: 2/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterWilliam55

Omega.....and If this person continues to come in and never knits a cozy, but yet they are full of advice on knitting, do you take them seriously?


Actually, I may want their advice on the type of yarn that works best, what sort of knots work best for the type of project I am working on, because not all things dealing with knitting involve actual knitting and can be found in a book.... people have been getting information on how to do a thing via the written word for millenia. There are actually some people that can read how to do a thing and then do it rather well. People assemble things with directions that come in the box every day and the world doesn't fall apart.

Actually I would rather have someone that had no experience dominating than one who thought they knew it all


julia

(in reply to MasterWilliam55)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 8:53:24 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
If of course they actually used what they learned, but the issue is not learning something...Of course you can learn from books and from on-line as well. But if they simply pick up a bit of theory and hang around the internet without putting anything into practise, it's just theory. On-line BDSM can be considered a community in it's own right, but it doesn't approximate real-life practise. If you actually put it to real use, the books become a stepping stone. Real-life teaches you things that theory never will.

Julie..I don't know everything....but I do know this, everything you learn from books worth reading about BDM was written by people who practised it or otherwise experienced it in real life. Even with this robust knowledge, yes, you can learn what's involved in making a whip but you learn quickly that actually making a whip is a completely different story. The experience of reading about flogging does not prepare you for holding it in your hand, feeling it's texture and hearing the swish and the cries from your partner and knowing what you are doing.  Knowing what a D/s or M/s relationship is all about from a piece of paper is of small comfort when your trying to figure out the dynamics of your particular RL relationship. Reading all the Harlequin Romance novels ever written have not prepared anyone for falling in love.

Yes, people do stay in cyber space for very valid reasons. I'll bet you though, if they could, many would love to try real-life. My heart goes out to them. I know many that can't enter BDSM for very good reasons. This group reminds me how lucky I have been, and I include them in my own personal "lifestyle" space, but others, because it's only a fantasy to them and still others because it's a game to them,  I'm sorry, but I don't believe they are part of this "lifestyle".

The OP asked if she was alone in believing, that purely surfing the net wasn't a qualifying action for being "in the lifestyle". She's right! They can, in a very loose way, be a part of the community, but the "lifestyle" implies LIVING it. I agree with her. She may be very young, and I have my issues about that, but in this case her original statement is correct in my view. She plays the game in real-life. she's earned the tee shirt.



(in reply to SinergyNstrumpet)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 9:10:50 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
What if they used to knit but their arthritis prevents them doing it anymore. So they use a voice activated keyboard program and still offer suggestions to other knitters. Are they now fake because they can no longer knit?

Same's true with people who have developed chronic illnesses that keep them housebound but still enjoy talking about things they enjoy, and getting a little of that enjoyment back by doing it over the computer.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to MasterWilliam55)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 9:22:12 PM   
DrummerDom


Posts: 49
Joined: 2/16/2008
Status: offline
I've been active in the lifestyle far longer IRL than I have been active online.

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 9:49:22 PM   
astarri


Posts: 265
Joined: 4/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Yeah I tend to not like those types of people either.

BTW I don't just scene...I live this D/s thing too...and service...every fuckin day. It's not about playing. Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.


Late in the discussion, but i just wanted to ask ... is it doing dishes that makes a person a real slave? I ask because i was married for 13 years to a non dominant man and yet i did the dishes every day.

I do not think anyone here is saying ... oh yes online is the best possibility for any kind of relationship. For someone to come along and say the whole experience is invalid seems a tad narrow minded.
For someone who is simply interested in responses, you seem to be to be quite close minded about it and defensive that the only experience that should be deemed valid is your own.

< Message edited by astarri -- 3/17/2008 9:50:03 PM >

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 10:20:58 PM   
Owned1


Posts: 847
Joined: 7/6/2005
From: Toronto, Ontario
Status: offline
I think the web can be a great place to explore and learn-via words.  One can play online to get a kinda sorta feel for the expectations, however until you have played flesh to flesh either in a public or private forum I do not believe you can say you are part of anything.

I know many people are afraid of being found out if they venture into the real world of flesh however if you are seen at a function then the person there is also seen at the function therefore one out turns to another.

What is there truly to be ashamed about if you are involved in kinky play?  More than we imagine I am sure are doing this and more in their own houses without speaking about it to anyone.

Munches are very vanilla usually in public places with nothing that gives away what you are involved in.  There are many internet - not kinky types- who meet in person.

Personally for those who only play online without ever planning on venturing out to the world of flesh probably should stay there as they are hiding something more than I would want to know.

Owned

_____________________________

~~in His Chains i am free~~

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 10:31:11 PM   
SinergyNstrumpet


Posts: 305
Joined: 2/26/2008
Status: offline
What about those who play in the privacy of their home and do all manner of kinky stuff to each other without going to munches and other activities. Such is the case with us, although we do not have an overwhelming desire to be weal nor twue... so I can promise you I will not be offended if I am not considered so



julia

(in reply to Owned1)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 10:43:56 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
Public play is not the issue. As long as your playing and keep the dynamic alive it counts.

(in reply to SinergyNstrumpet)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 10:51:52 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
The point is, if they knit in the past they learned the real-life lessons. They have the experience. They are still a part of the "lifestyle" and can and do contribute in many ways.

The same can be said of your second point. If they participated in real-life at some point in their lives, they are also part of the community.

We are talking here of those who do Not particiapte for whatever reason or at any time.

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 10:59:20 PM   
SinergyNstrumpet


Posts: 305
Joined: 2/26/2008
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterWilliam55

Public play is not the issue. As long as your playing and keep the dynamic alive it counts.


Some people do not consider those who do not engage in a public dynamic, attend lifestyle events, etc, to be weal or twue. There has been more than one thread on that topic.

Some people only consider those who go to dungeons to be lifestyle couples that have "validity" because they got their stamp of approval from the "community".

Now, like I said, I agree in a small way because I am not really a part of some larger "lifestyle". What Daddy and I do is a love style for us. I do not consider myself a part of the "community" although I have been told a few times that by posting here I have become a part of the larger community, which is really ironic because of talking about those who are "just online". My interaction with WIITWD is restricted to my Daddy and CM... that is it.


julia

(in reply to MasterWilliam55)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? - 3/17/2008 11:04:36 PM   
astarri


Posts: 265
Joined: 4/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterWilliam55

The point is, if they knit in the past they learned the real-life lessons. They have the experience. They are still a part of the "lifestyle" and can and do contribute in many ways.

The same can be said of your second point. If they participated in real-life at some point in their lives, they are also part of the community.

We are talking here of those who do Not particiapte for whatever reason or at any time.


Well i believe that would bring up a whole new thread on what activities make you a participant. If a couple likes sex a lil rough and he smacks her bottom does that make them participants in "The Lifestyle" even if they do not know the terms? Maybe he ties her to the bed. Are they participants now?




(in reply to MasterWilliam55)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.098