Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: free woman?????????????


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: free woman????????????? Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 6:48:09 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
I thought "Histoire d'O" was dreadful, but there you have it... there's no arguing over literary taste  (I read the French version first, being a frog, but thought the English translation fared better). It's just a wankbook crankfile for bored bourgeois bitches.

That women are "naturally submissive" because they carry children and nurture them is presposterous: nobody has yet explained to me why it follows that because of this, women naturally bow in front of male authority. Au contraire: they're the ones who spank the naughty boys  .

One gender isn't more "biologically enclined to submission" than the other simply because of their biological function: men may have more muscular strength; but women are more resistant and live longer. *Shrug*.

To believe that physical power implies domination or vice versa stems from a narrow view of humanity and of the world in general, but it's a convenient explanation for those that have a sexual hunger for domination. Me, I respect a dominant who embraces his or her quirk without feeling the need to explain it via dodgy and antiquated anthropoligical reasons :-) .


_____________________________



(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 7:26:49 AM   
Wildfleurs


Posts: 1650
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

One gender isn't more "biologically enclined to submission" than the other simply because of their biological function: men may have more muscular strength; but women are more resistant and live longer. *Shrug*.



What seems strange to me is how goreans don't see the similarities between their arguements about gender based inclinations towards submission/strength/dominance and the same arguements made about blacks/whites in America about a century ago (and probably still made among racist/KKK type circles), in particular with arguements pertaining to black people's cranium and brain size.

I just can't see a difference between arguing gender based superiority/dominance and arguing racial based superiority/dominance - and I can't see how its an appealing ethics base to adopt.

C~


_____________________________

"Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid." -despair.com

~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The heart of it all - http://www.wildfleurs.com
~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 8:18:42 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs
What seems strange to me is how goreans don't see the similarities between their arguements about gender based inclinations towards submission/strength/dominance and the same arguements made about blacks/whites in America about a century ago (and probably still made among racist/KKK type circles), in particular with arguements pertaining to black people's cranium and brain size.


yes and whipping your sub/slave in all of the bdsm lifestyle is glorification o the South with it is slavery 

_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to Wildfleurs)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 8:20:59 AM   
colouredin


Posts: 4279
Joined: 2/2/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs
What seems strange to me is how goreans don't see the similarities between their arguements about gender based inclinations towards submission/strength/dominance and the same arguements made about blacks/whites in America about a century ago (and probably still made among racist/KKK type circles), in particular with arguements pertaining to black people's cranium and brain size.


yes and whipping your sub/slave in all of the bdsm lifestyle is glorification o the South with it is slavery 


Lol no thats totally missing her point actually, she is saying that its based on bigotry that people are inherantly one type of thing which fundementally is what bigotry is what makes the differance is that you choose that thing rather than are given a role based on any biological thing, whipping a sub/slave is based on CONSENT and CHOICE and PLEASURE something that wasnt really at the front of slave owners minds.

< Message edited by colouredin -- 3/23/2008 8:22:21 AM >


_____________________________

Resident Lime(y) Tart
There would be no gossip without secrets
I don't want to be anything other than what I've been trying to be lately

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELvfMJoKDAk

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 8:28:07 AM   
Wildfleurs


Posts: 1650
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs
What seems strange to me is how goreans don't see the similarities between their arguements about gender based inclinations towards submission/strength/dominance and the same arguements made about blacks/whites in America about a century ago (and probably still made among racist/KKK type circles), in particular with arguements pertaining to black people's cranium and brain size.


yes and whipping your sub/slave in all of the bdsm lifestyle is glorification o the South with it is slavery 


Coloredlin is correct, you've absolutely misunderstood my point.  When someones ethical base for relating to everyone is based on a belief of biological superiority/dominance I don't think it being based on gender superiority/dominance is any different than it being based on racial superiority/dominance.

Whipping someone has nothing to do with their ethical base or belief of biological superiority/dominance. 

C~


_____________________________

"Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid." -despair.com

~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The heart of it all - http://www.wildfleurs.com
~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 9:48:58 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

"Attacks on other peoples choices only show gross ignorrance..." said Iron Bear.

I can't agree with that more, IB! Think you can talk to the Gor folk about not attacking me, based on the fact that I'm a male sub? Or pissing on my Domme because she IS a Domme?

I doubt it too... Yeah, well, see what you can do, ol' buddy...


As far  as the Gor Board used to be, those who were anti-male subs used to keep away from them by using silence. However there were the odd kajirus or three over time. Real Life, face to face, I've only come across (in person) one Gorean Master who was so anti male sub/slaves that he'd walk out of the room or leave the place. The folks I still mix with have no problems with them We used to be on the look out for a kajirus ot three for a long time..

As far as influencing anyone either here or elswhere, I'd be as much use as titts on a bull. Onvce I left Gor. Only those who had become good friends physically of which a number ewere my mentors in the US are still in close contact. For the rrest I seem to beunpopular as a Turncoat...

Iron Bear
Master of Bruin Cottage
(A Victorian Lifestyle poly home)


"I judge a Man by what I see him do and not by what others tell me he does." (Captain Sir Edward Pellew of the HMS Indefatigable to Midshipman Hornblower ~ C.S. Forrester)


(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 1:37:00 PM   
littlebitxxx


Posts: 732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

Again, thank you so much...

If I could ask you just one last question... ( ok it may lead to more.. but one never knows.. and it is soooooooooooooooooo nice to have you here to ask these questions I have always tried to ask. So I am deeply grateful for that.)

What is your personal take on the panther girls...

Since you are in essance a FW and heck.. a Woman period... I would love to know your view on them.

Esp when it comes to thier role in the here and now in how people portray them in the Gor Community online and in RL.

Why would someone ( in your mind) chose a panther girl archtype?

And what does being a panther girl mean to you?

This confused me because if they are women who go against the society then why play it out online in the forums and cause issues and back lash ( from what I had first understood of them from some peoples explination of them and in my own readings... )

If it is the strongest of one half requiring just as strong of a mate and not settling for some who was not worthy of them.. I can get behind that... Hell I *am* behind that... and the whole "great surrender" thing I can understand. ( though I still think the concept of behind every woman is a quivvering slave at heart is a lovely concept but not the case in every instance. )

So what do you think?

Gwyn


Hi Gwyn,
Lol...questions are not a problem, they make me think and do some more introspection of "yeah, just what DO I think about this"??  Again, everything I say is from my own point of view.
I equate panther girls to almost the cougar vanilla types (of which I think I was one).  You know the type, just out of a bad marriage and figure men aren't worth even the amount of oxygen they use.  They are good for one thing and one thing only and even then most of them suck at it.  AA batteries are bought in huge quantities...lol.  Almost like they turn into a man-hater, chasing them only to catch and subdue them to their will, especially if they had a man that pulled the control freak on them.  Look downtown in almost any full bar on a Saturday night and you'll see herds (flocks?) of so-called "panther girls" lying in wait or stalking any available man to turn the tables on him.  Pick him up and take him home to use him for what (she figures) is all he's good for...to be left without a note in the morning.  A reverse kinda take on the macho-man-he-stud-muffin that other guys look up to and good girls stay far away from.

Maybe these "panther girls" online strutting their stuff and causing trouble are just very frustrated women towards the end of a bad marriage or just gotten out of one.  This can be a lash out for them, a roleplay so they don't have to screw up the courage to do it in real time.  Easier to stalk, take down, subdue, fuck and leave a man online than to risk personal safety and health in real life.  I really don't know, Gwyn, why any woman would purposely do it, I can just guess.

As for your last paragraph, I agree totally.  Any woman, 100,000 years ago or today, will pick a strong, decisive mate over a wishy-washy sycophant.  It's survival of the family.  And the fact that women are stronger and more independent nowadays just means the men have to actually work at it now.  Some can and some can't.  I can also understand the whole surrendering thing and how romantic it would be...for a short time.  Living that????  I don't hardly think so!   I would much rather be the "quivering mass of orgasmic ooze" in the bedroom, and the Babe In Total Control of Herself outside.  Yanno?

Keep 'em coming, Gwyn.  I'm having fun now that I've found and dusted off my thinking cap. 

_____________________________

There is no such thing as can't unless it is followed by yet

It is the meaningless little acts that become meaningful in the doing.

The people that mind don't matter and the people that matter don't mind.

(in reply to Gwynvyd)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 2:45:15 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

a panter girl... is not often taken seriously by peopel living the Gorean way. They are mainly part of the IRC online play.
It is hard to give them a place in reallife gorean lifestyle. In the gorean forum, some one just introduced herself as one. PErhaps that is an interesting read.

btw My girl, a sub, asked me about the Gor books last night. I tried in a few lines to describe what the ssence of them is...in my view.
THen she described "The story of O'".....often loved by females. BEsides the different setting...those books come very close to eachother.. depending how you read them.
I am very curious why one book is so cursed and the other so loved..while in the concept..they are not so differently.


Personaly I found "The Story of O" to be quite over rated. *shrugs* it was ground breaking for when it was written.. but it was not the end all be all for for me as it is for some. I think it might be the differance in writing styles.. and less Earth man and woman bashing.. and all of that... not to mention the whole of society is not complacent in slavery.. it is just basicaly a select BDSM club in O's case. There is no driving thought or philosphy behind why.. other then her own will to be. *shrugs* It was written durring yet another sexual revolution ( an earlier one) and it had it's concepts from what a woman took from it. It was not a back lash against what women were doing.. so I supose women find it more apealing in general.

again it was not my fave read.

Gwyn

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 2:47:00 PM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs
What seems strange to me is how goreans don't see the similarities between their arguements about gender based inclinations towards submission/strength/dominance and the same arguements made about blacks/whites in America about a century ago (and probably still made among racist/KKK type circles), in particular with arguements pertaining to black people's cranium and brain size.


yes and whipping your sub/slave in all of the bdsm lifestyle is glorification o the South with it is slavery 


Lol no thats totally missing her point actually, she is saying that its based on bigotry that people are inherantly one type of thing which fundementally is what bigotry is what makes the differance is that you choose that thing rather than are given a role based on any biological thing, whipping a sub/slave is based on CONSENT and CHOICE and PLEASURE something that wasnt really at the front of slave owners minds.


well it did sound cool  :P

I will reread it.

*done*

sorry  still see it the same way. Can't make more of it. But if 2 people say I am wrong...and it is sunday...I just agree... I am tired ;)

< Message edited by Justme696 -- 3/23/2008 2:49:34 PM >


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to colouredin)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 3:15:47 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

I just can't see a difference between arguing gender based superiority/dominance and arguing racial based superiority/dominance - and I can't see how its an appealing ethics base to adopt.



Spot on.

_____________________________



(in reply to Wildfleurs)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 3:52:11 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

I just can't see a difference between arguing gender based superiority/dominance and arguing racial based superiority/dominance - and I can't see how its an appealing ethics base to adopt.



Spot on.


Economics.

Why were men the superior persons for years and years?  Economics.

Read up on farming.

Read up on weaving. 

There is a reason that the advent of many people using industrial means is CALLED the Industrial Revolution.



_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 4:22:41 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

When someones ethical base for relating to everyone is based on a belief of biological superiority/dominance.... gender superiority/dominance.... racial superiority/dominance.

Goreans do not associate superiority with dominance.
 
K.
 

(in reply to Wildfleurs)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/23/2008 4:56:02 PM   
Wildfleurs


Posts: 1650
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

When someones ethical base for relating to everyone is based on a belief of biological superiority/dominance.... gender superiority/dominance.... racial superiority/dominance.

Goreans do not associate superiority with dominance.
 
K.
 


Just for clarification, when I used the slash I meant both so I meant racial superiority and dominance - I was simply using the slash as shorthand.  I don't think racial biological dominance sounds any better though.....

C~


_____________________________

"Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid." -despair.com

~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The heart of it all - http://www.wildfleurs.com
~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/24/2008 12:18:32 PM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I thought "Histoire d'O" was dreadful, but there you have it... there's no arguing over literary taste  (I read the French version first, being a frog, but thought the English translation fared better). It's just a wankbook crankfile for bored bourgeois bitches.

That women are "naturally submissive" because they carry children and nurture them is presposterous: nobody has yet explained to me why it follows that because of this, women naturally bow in front of male authority. Au contraire: they're the ones who spank the naughty boys  .

One gender isn't more "biologically enclined to submission" than the other simply because of their biological function: men may have more muscular strength; but women are more resistant and live longer. *Shrug*.

To believe that physical power implies domination or vice versa stems from a narrow view of humanity and of the world in general, but it's a convenient explanation for those that have a sexual hunger for domination. Me, I respect a dominant who embraces his or her quirk without feeling the need to explain it via dodgy and antiquated anthropoligical reasons :-) .



Interestingly enough, charlotte is the spitting image of Corinne Clery (from Histoire d')

http://filmfanatic.org/reviews/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/Clery.JPG
http://www.dvdrama.com/imagescrit/moonraker016.jpg
http://www.jahsonic.com/Corinne.jpg

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

I just can't see a difference between arguing gender based superiority/dominance and arguing racial based superiority/dominance - and I can't see how its an appealing ethics base to adopt.



Spot on.


I believe the difference to be that ethnic divisions aren't (evolutionarily speaking) directly responsible for the nature of interpersonal relationships.  It's not a question of weak ethics; it's quite common in nature for one gender or another to typically dominate the other.  Simply because we're no longer clubbing our food to death, doesn't mean that physical differences have no impact on social orientations. 

This isn't to suggest all women must be submissive; rather it explains why a larger proportion of women are submissive.  It's not a question of right or wrong, but rather understanding social evolution.

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/24/2008 12:24:02 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlebitxxx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

Again, thank you so much...

If I could ask you just one last question... ( ok it may lead to more.. but one never knows.. and it is soooooooooooooooooo nice to have you here to ask these questions I have always tried to ask. So I am deeply grateful for that.)

What is your personal take on the panther girls...

Since you are in essance a FW and heck.. a Woman period... I would love to know your view on them.

Esp when it comes to thier role in the here and now in how people portray them in the Gor Community online and in RL.

Why would someone ( in your mind) chose a panther girl archtype?

And what does being a panther girl mean to you?

This confused me because if they are women who go against the society then why play it out online in the forums and cause issues and back lash ( from what I had first understood of them from some peoples explination of them and in my own readings... )

If it is the strongest of one half requiring just as strong of a mate and not settling for some who was not worthy of them.. I can get behind that... Hell I *am* behind that... and the whole "great surrender" thing I can understand. ( though I still think the concept of behind every woman is a quivvering slave at heart is a lovely concept but not the case in every instance. )

So what do you think?

Gwyn


Hi Gwyn,
Lol...questions are not a problem, they make me think and do some more introspection of "yeah, just what DO I think about this"??  Again, everything I say is from my own point of view.
I equate panther girls to almost the cougar vanilla types (of which I think I was one).  You know the type, just out of a bad marriage and figure men aren't worth even the amount of oxygen they use.  They are good for one thing and one thing only and even then most of them suck at it.  AA batteries are bought in huge quantities...lol. 

Switch to the 9v... so muuuuch better! Whoo boy! *chuckles*

Almost like they turn into a man-hater, chasing them only to catch and subdue them to their will, especially if they had a man that pulled the control freak on them.  Look downtown in almost any full bar on a Saturday night and you'll see herds (flocks?) of so-called "panther girls" lying in wait or stalking any available man to turn the tables on him.  Pick him up and take him home to use him for what (she figures) is all he's good for...to be left without a note in the morning.  A reverse kinda take on the macho-man-he-stud-muffin that other guys look up to and good girls stay far away from.

Ahhhh so instead of being the passive slut.... who is being just used.. as some of my more neanderthal male friends would call a cum dumpster... they actualy go out and find and use men the exact way men have done women for ages... Niether of which I find to be useful or amusing. Rather sad and juvinile actualy.

Maybe these "panther girls" online strutting their stuff and causing trouble are just very frustrated women towards the end of a bad marriage or just gotten out of one.  This can be a lash out for them, a roleplay so they don't have to screw up the courage to do it in real time.  Easier to stalk, take down, subdue, fuck and leave a man online than to risk personal safety and health in real life.  I really don't know, Gwyn, why any woman would purposely do it, I can just guess.

My point had been when I had asked basicaly why would someone wish to portray someone who is such a negative counterpoint to the whole theme of the given society online... knowing they were going to step on toes... and basicaly always be the odd (wo)man out.. why do it? I wouldnt step into a Primative Southern Baptist church with my girlfriend and kiss her to prove some dumb assed point.. I wouldnt walk into a RNC convention and call them all a bunch of baby eaters.... I would just be asking for a load of shit... so why do it?

As for your last paragraph, I agree totally.  Any woman, 100,000 years ago or today, will pick a strong, decisive mate over a wishy-washy sycophant.  It's survival of the family.  And the fact that women are stronger and more independent nowadays just means the men have to actually work at it now.  Some can and some can't.  I can also understand the whole surrendering thing and how romantic it would be...for a short time.  Living that????  I don't hardly think so!   I would much rather be the "quivering mass of orgasmic ooze" in the bedroom, and the Babe In Total Control of Herself outside.  Yanno?

Yeppers.. I am right there with you.... It is why I chose my males very carefuly.. and why I am so damn picky about them. If I am bigger and stronger then they are.. and if it came down to a fight and I would have to worry about thier safety and them holding thier own... I just cant bring myself to want more then friendship from them. Ya gotta be able to hang with the big dogs. You also cant be this testerone poisoned jack ass that thinks a dick makes you superior. LOL Finding a strong man who is also emotionaly and mentaly strong ( straight and single gosh darn it! ) is like finding a Unicorn!

Keep 'em coming, Gwyn.  I'm having fun now that I've found and dusted off my thinking cap. 


I have had so much fun discussing all of this with you. Thank you for sharing your views. It has been so much easier with out the good ol' boy club of " Guh! you just dont understand us you silly female.. so therefore you must hate us and look down apon us! Why do you you question us?" BS.
 
You are a true gem and that man of yours is damn lucky to have you.. and since you chose him.. I am certain you are damn lucky to have him too.
 
Gwyn
 
 

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to littlebitxxx)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/24/2008 12:35:25 PM   
Wildfleurs


Posts: 1650
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

I believe the difference to be that ethnic divisions aren't (evolutionarily speaking) directly responsible for the nature of interpersonal relationships.



Because the mandingo thing hasn't been happening for forever......

And I think there is a definite arguement that could be made that the shift that I see complained about on Gor boards is the natural shift to what actually works for women without so many legal and economic pressures or requirements to keep themselves small.  As opposed to what took place historically for women in relationships which was largely due to institutional and legal mechanisms in place that forced women into a very fixed role with limited life options.

C~



_____________________________

"Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid." -despair.com

~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
The heart of it all - http://www.wildfleurs.com
~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/24/2008 12:46:11 PM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

I believe the difference to be that ethnic divisions aren't (evolutionarily speaking) directly responsible for the nature of interpersonal relationships.



Because the mandingo thing hasn't been happening for forever......

And I think there is a definite arguement that could be made that the shift that I see complained about on Gor boards is the natural shift to what actually works for women without so many legal and economic pressures or requirements to keep themselves small.  As opposed to what took place historically for women in relationships which was largely due to institutional and legal mechanisms in place that forced women into a very fixed role with limited life options.

C~


Excellent observation.

I believe those legal, social, and institutional mechanisms you mentioned derived, evolutionarily speaking, in the same manner as dark skin, greater height, resistance to certain diseases, etc.  Not all evolutionary traits are necessarily going to be positive.

With a vengeance, I am committed to the concept that all people, regardless of race, gender, religion, etc should be afforded the equal opportunity to chose the life for themselves they most enjoy.  That means if a woman wants to be a slave, or own a male or female slave, go for it.  A man wishes to be a slave or own a male or female slave, go for it.  Observing patterns, and tapping into those aspects of personality that exist from both nature and nurture doesn't equate with locking people into fixed roles.  I can say "I enjoy a woman in my house on my knees, and I feel our male dominated relationship is exactly what fulfills me.  I think male dominants are fulfilled because of the traditional social expectations which have formed me."  I can't say "All women should be slaves, because that's the model that allowed our race to exist up to today."  Technology has reached a point where there is no longer a biological necessity for gender defined/divided roles.  This means a person of either gender is entitled to pursue the lifestyle they enjoy, equally.

I just happen to prefer my women on their knees.

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to Wildfleurs)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/24/2008 12:56:57 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

This isn't to suggest all women must be submissive; rather it explains why a larger proportion of women are submissive.  It's not a question of right or wrong, but rather understanding social evolution.


 
Which is why we're working towards a social revolution.

_____________________________



(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/26/2008 10:37:36 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I thought "Histoire d'O" was dreadful, but there you have it... there's no arguing over literary taste  (I read the French version first, being a frog, but thought the English translation fared better). It's just a wankbook crankfile for bored bourgeois bitches.


Perhaps Genji would be more to your liking?

quote:

That women are "naturally submissive" because they carry children and nurture them is presposterous


A lot of people make arguments from lots of speculation, or generalize their experiences too far.

quote:

One gender isn't more "biologically enclined to submission" than the other simply because of their biological function: men may have more muscular strength; but women are more resistant and live longer. *Shrug*.


One gender is more biologically inclined to conquest and dominance, due to sexual dimorphisms of the brain that have been verified with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The limbic system of the male triggers more intensely during conquest and acquisition than that of the female. Testosterone also makes a difference in this regard, although that is a more tenuous connection.

Nobody sensible is saying all men are dominant, just that most men are more dominant than most women.

Both genders are inclined to submission under duress, but the female gender is more likely to adapt, due to similar differences. The likelyhood of continued defiance, or choosing death over surrender, is lower than that of a male (again, on average). This has been an evolutionary advantage for millenia, and is presumably part of the basis for things like capture bonding. It happens to men too, mind you, but there's usually less resistance to overcome in a female.

Again, nobody sensible is saying that all women are submissive, or "born slaves", just that the average woman is more likely to accept slavery than the average man. Which is relevant in a jungle law context, slave trade, or institutionalized slavery, but not so much otherwise, unless one has chosen a lifestyle that rejects the idea that freedom can be given, rather than being seized by and for oneself. In the Gorean view, being given "freedom" is just less intrusive slavery.

quote:

To believe that physical power implies domination or vice versa stems from a narrow view of humanity and of the world in general, but it's a convenient explanation for those that have a sexual hunger for domination.


It doesn't imply domination, but it can be a factor. People instinctively size up a person they are interacting with, although men and women are probably looking at different things. Height and physical strengths are factors in that, as lots of submissive women on these boards have admitted. There was even a thread called "you have to be this tall to ride" or somesuch.

But in the context of submission or slavery, another factor is more important: will. It is of little consequence whether the other party has the muscle to back up what they say, if they lack the commitment to it. And various people obviously respond differently to physicality, or the possibility of it, but in my experience, most women respond better when they know that the power dynamic is not merely a suspense of disbelief.

quote:

Me, I respect a dominant who embraces his or her quirk without feeling the need to explain it via dodgy and antiquated anthropoligical reasons :-)


On that point, I agree. It should come naturally.

Which doesn't prevent me from occasionally digging into the research for some pearls to dump in front of male supremacist swine (I'm an intellectual masochist, I think), and finding some interesting facts along the way. But generalities are an inferior source of information, when compared to the reference: the individual in front of you, whether kneeling or upright.

That's where I prefer to go to find out how someone ticks.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: free woman????????????? - 3/26/2008 10:45:02 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

I just can't see a difference between arguing gender based superiority/dominance and arguing racial based superiority/dominance - and I can't see how its an appealing ethics base to adopt.


Quite agree. As a Gorean, I subscribe to the notion that individual merit is the key.

And superiority is a meaningless term, except in a context: superior at what?
Chances are, my proficiency in Norwegian is superior to yours.
From your profile, your knife play is superior to mine.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Wildfleurs)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: free woman????????????? Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094