MidMichCowboy
Posts: 665
Joined: 3/23/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Now, as to what I THINK you meant, gender rather than species. Thank you for correcting that. Although my first wife isn't quite sure that I'm human, I do maintain the same DNA quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Neither is more dominant, individual are. Throughout history, it hasn't been all males or females who were dominant, its been individuals. When strength was the main criteria, the biggest, bad ass around shoved everyone around, men and women. If he wanted your woman, he took her. If he wanted your food, he took it. Then there were the women who found a big strong man and manipulated him. Who was dominant there? When strength (physical) was not the most important, men or women of exceptional ability rose to the top. Whether we saw them or not, these people of ability have always dominated. And in spite of what society thought, most everyone else was just cattle. In our "enlightened" age, we are suppose to care about the worth of every individual. In areas that really matter, we do. In days past, Stephen Hawkins would have been left outside in the wilderness to die. Today, he leads us in to the future. Before her death, Benazir Bhutto lead a Muslim country. Things are changing and now those with ability and intellect can rise to the top, regardless of gender, race or circumstances. We are not all the way there yet, but we are making progress. But still, we have ... the sheep. Those who want to be led, who don't want to take responsibilities for keeping the world running. Those who keep their bigoted little ideas and maintain the facade of being in control of their lives. Just my rantings. :)
_____________________________
I want to capture your mind, your spirit, your soul, your body, your devotion and your love. Then, will I give you my heart.
|