meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
ORIGINAL: RealityLicks quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112] Further, I would argue that voluntary cooperation and collectivism are mutually exclusive. I disagree. Or if you prefer: I would contend that your position as stated is, in fact, erroneous. Contend away. It would not make you any less wrong. The logic is simple. Collectivism is inherently coercive. The individual man does not own, does not control, and therefore cannot choose for himself how resources should be utilized in a collective. Collectivism precludes the possibility of the individual withdrawing from the collective, for to make such a choice requires supremacy of individual right and individual ownership of resources--both of which are categorically antithetical to the collective. Thus "cooperation" within a collective is left as the only option, with no second option. In order for any act to be voluntary, there must be a real capacity to refuse to commit the act. Saying "yes" is not voluntary if there is not a real power to say "no". Thus it is that voluntary cooperation is not possible within a collective. This is not true. You define an extreme and then say it proves your point. The USA is a collective, a collective that is skewed towards favouring the rich at the expense of the poor but still a collective and you are a member of that collective.
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|