puppy4owner
Posts: 40
Joined: 2/20/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsHonor One person (OmegaG) says "atheists are theists too" and SixFootMaster says "Connection with nature is definitely a form of spirituality." and "A person lacking in spirituality is... incapable of appreciating greater nobility and beauty in the world at large" No undue offense intended, but both remind me on a line in The Princess Bride: "You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means." Atheists are most certainly not theists. In fact, oddly enough, not being a theist is the sole qualification for being an "atheist". "Deist" means you believe in a creator who does not intervene in the universe. "Theist" means you believe in a creator who does intervene. "Atheist" means you believe there is no such creator. "Spirituality" is a belief that the "spirit" or "soul" exists, distinct from physical matter. "Religion" is a system or doctrine of worship of a superhuman power or authority, most usually, specifically a god or gods. Many religions include a doctrine of spirituality, but the two are absolutely not the same thing, nor is spirituality synonymous with - nor the lack thereof mutually exclusive with - a sense of wonder and beauty. As a partial agreement with the general tone of the thread, I do think the question of religion, spirituality, and political philosophy are rather important to identify early on... Particularly if you're not the sort who's happy with a "live and let live" course of action on such things. To me "live and let live" is for things like "I like broccoli and you don't" or "You like Monet, and I think he sucked.", not things like "I live in a world of rational reality and you base important decisions on superstition and nonsense." I have it listed in my profile journal posts as something a submissive should carefully consider before contacting me, and I may edit it sometime to make it even more clear and strident. Along with basic (and, I would think, obvious) requirements of loyalty and ethical fitness, I require a high degree of functional intelligence, logical capacity, ability to learn, and open-mindedness... Although it's important that the latter not be confused with starry-eyed gullibility or empty-headed credulity. In early acquainting conversations, I tell any prospective submissive that religion and politics will be discussed, and I will not shy away from calling illogical, irrational, or outright silly ideas anything but what they are. My slaves are not required to agree with me, but they are required to formulate a rational argument to defend their position when they don't... And, sometimes, even when they do. I don't allow taboo subjects, and I don't "agree to disagree." - all that means is either that one of us can't defend her position, or one of us doesn't consider the other's ideas worthy of due consideration. They will be expected to eloquently and rigorously defend any philosophy or belief they hold to, just as they will be expected to honestly argue any of my positions that they disagree with. There will be frank discussion, and there will likely be harsh humor. I have a robust and direct sense of humor, and if the perpetrators and willing subjects of the oldest and most widely duplicated con-game in human history, responsible for more pain and suffering than any other sociological device ever created aren't worthy of derision, I don't know what possibly could be. Not all ideas are equal in value. The fact that someone "believes" an idea doesn't make it automatically worthy of reverence and respect. Any "belief" that can't be defended isn't worth the space it's taking up in your head. brilliant,very well said.Religion has become the evil it professes to be fighting against,taking money from mostly poor,uneducated people with very little understanding of science and recent discoveries,particularly genetics to trace our ancestry very far back.Many have heard that 98% of our genes are the same as monkeys but did you know 40% of our genes are shared with lettuce?
|