OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59
"For all your gyrations and straw man arguments, you cannot evade the simple reality that socialism necessarily invalidates individual thought and individual expression."
~~~~~~~~~~~
Can you give us three valid examples of this?
Or even one?
1
2
3
quote:
The folks that I see crushing liberty, are the conservatives.
Actually both parties have and do. When a government is not the servant of the people, it is what occurs.
quote:
Question,and it`s a biggy.
Which party was it that suspended "habeas corpus"?
A law,concept and human right held by good men ,since before the Constitution or before the Bill of Rights.
Without habeas corpus,about 9/10s of the Bill of Rights is invalidated.
Try and name any part of the Bill of Rights, that can exist without habeas corpus?
It`s not possible.
Again,which political party suspended habeas corpus?
Both have. Here is a refresher of memory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_9066
quote:
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsandfreedoms/a/habeuscorpus.htm
Btw,the conservatives have bragged about suspending this law,in case you were gearing up to deny it was suspended.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Which party is subsidizing big business and offering huge tax cuts to folks with the most money/wealth?
Both have. you have to do a little more digging for the Dem side but if someone else wishes to educate you, they can provide sources.
quote:
Which party rewrote the labor laws,throwing millions of blue-collar laborers into "management status",and therefore
cutting any and all over-time pay to them?
Have you ever read the economic studies about the models if it had not been done? I suppose you would have prefered the other way. Both parties have done something to hurt blue collar workers.
quote:
Was it liberals that did such a calculated, one-sided and unfair deal like that?
Politicians of both parties have. Stop being a cheerleader. Just standing around and saying "my side is better than your side" does nothing and increases division. How about forcing the politicians into doing something.
< Message edited by OrionTheWolf -- 4/7/2008 2:48:55 PM >
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|
RE: "Obama Can't Win"; Hillary Clinton - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread