LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
Hiya Stephann, Oddly enough, there's another thread running around here somewhere that gives My opinion on the other half of it as well. I find that ownership, either past or present, also contributes to this debate. That's My way of saying that, in My defition when it comes to this lifestyle, the term Mistress/Master has something to do with having a dynamic with an s-type (to steal jen's term). Yes, a person could possibly arrive at being at a level of skill in a certain technique without ever having had that in their life, but I find that extremely rare. Anyone who could be considered a Master at Shibari, for example, has probably had a serious relationship during those years of study and practice. A statement that you made above, my slave may think of me as a great man, but that's not the reason that I own her, does work in the reverse as well. It's entirely possible that the reason you own her today, is because she was first drawn to the great man. I'd give her that much credit in knowing the quality of her potential Master back then, wouldn't you? Prrysefanie, yes, there are people who don't see the need for continuous improvement. Even in this thread, there's been a mention or two of the type. Unfortunately, some have come to hear terms like "Old Guard" or "leather" to be synonymous with this, which really isn't the truth. As I've said before earlier in this thread, I don't claim either of these terms, but maybe you can understand the point. There are members of both the older generation, and the next generation, who do a disservice to those in their age group.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|