Real_Trouble
Posts: 471
Joined: 2/25/2008 Status: offline
|
I am going to decline to step into this, because it will quickly spiral out of control and turn into a flame war, except to state: One of the most important questions to ask when someone is suggesting that any field is scientific (in this case, be it the theory of evolution or intelligent design) is "can you test this, and is it falsifiable"? If someone cannot present a criteria for falsfiability, and cannot design experiments to test these criteria, then what is being done is not science. There are some very interesting writings by people like Hume, Popper, and Bacon on this very subject. I believe the technical field is loosely referred to as "philosophy of science", but that's a pretty broad term. Point is, if we're going to debate this or comment on it, can we at least do so intelligently ourselves? I've seen enough wild-assed uninformed bullshit about this topic all around to last several lifetimes already.
_____________________________
Send lawyers, guns, and money.
|