Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
as you have seen already in this thread, some folks have an aversion to labelling relationships or the folks that engage in them, as "vanilla". it doesn't bother this slave, as she has seen the term used to illustrate the difference between two versions of music, sex, financial instruments, RPG Narrativists, relationship dynamics as well as information technology, sans any negative connotation. one version is basic, generic and traditional...the other has more bells and whistles, is exotic and/or has attributes that distinguish it from the traditional, generally accepted version. this slave has used the term to refer to a traditional relationship (boyfriend/girlfriend or husband/wife) and/or the folks that are in them, as opposed to an alternative one, such as Master/slave. this slave places no generalized value judgement on either. "Vanilla" (or traditional relationships) are just as valid and can be just as fulfilling for folks who engage in them as alternative relationships are for the folks who engage in those. for some, traditional, or "vanilla" realtionships are not appropriate nor desirable. it is what caused this slave to go in search of friends for fun and frolic in the BDSM lifestyle world on internet sites much like this one, instead of searching on eharmony or match.com for a traditional, or "vanilla" boyfriend/husband relationship. that being said, spend as much time getting to know someone as is comfortable for the both of you in order to "get a sub". she isn't going to be "your" sub, until she consents, and the time it takes for her to come to that agreement with you is going to vary with the individual sub in question. good luck with your search.
|