Owner4SexSlave
Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
|
I have to disagree with your statement that a woman assumes a submissive posture for sexual acts with men or other women each time they have sex.
If a women throws a man down on a picnic table, unzips his pants, grabs his soft cock and works it to an erection, then mounts him and they have sex. This anything but a "submissive posture". However, even this act alone, one can not automatically assume either party is Dom/me or sub/slave or even Switch. Sexual acts alone, can not define the roles that are carried out in their relationship.
It is understood, in the example I just gave, that the women took the role of topping and the guy was the bottom, in the sexual activitity. The actual physical posture of the man was it submissive or not? Is her posture submissive or not? Subject of debate. What is given here, is that she was agressive and assertive in the action taken.
Assertiveness and aggression also, by no means indicates if either party is Dom or sub or even switch. This is in terms of relationship D/s. Now in the scope of the activitity itself, it's clear that she was the top and he was the bottom. To gain a clearer picture of the reality one would have to Step back, and look at the relationship as a whole.
What I just describe generally falls into the Norm of what perhaps a Domme would do with a male submissive, this may or may not be the case.
Perhaps, it was a Dom couple at play? Perhaps it was a Dom that ordered their sub to do this? Perhaps it was Dom that was simply allows there submissive to top them from time to time, to add extra spice to the relationship. Perhaps it was a Domme with her submissive partner doing this all along.
At times, many people become blind to what they see, because of how they personally relate to it in their own mindset.
If you for instance honestly believe that all women are submissive by nature, you will only see this. In fact you will have a difficult time in understanding anything outside of your own beliefs. Beliefs can lead to dangerous one wayism thinking and misunderstandings.
To the OP, many people have presented and expressed many things contrary to your opening post. Including Smart Ass Remarks. The smart ass remarks in themselves made to provoke further thought. At times, the experience of humilation from smart ass remarks is done in such a manner to make another person stop and think.
At times, it what we don't or refuse to see is what gets us into trouble. Again, even more so with one wayism thinking. At times there are in fact many ways, no one single way being the right nor wrong way.
For instance, would a real DOM allow a women to throw him down on a picnic table and do what I described? This can became a rather subjective matter. What somebody's image or belief in what a real Dom is or should be might differ from anothers.
This is why at times, it's best to avoid calling other people fakes, wannabes, or making conclusions that so and so is not a real anything. OK, fine, they are simply not the right person or match for you.
Now, for the most part, there are certain one wayism topics that will spark off a lot of recoil from other users. Topics such a Female Supremacy, for instance. If it being force feed down others people's throat as the True one wayism of the world. Same is true for "Misogyny".
The topic you have touched upon, is very similar in nature, hence the number of Smart Ass remarks and comments. You made some bold statements in terms of "I think many do not realize it in real life", meaning that you yourself have already established in your mindset what you are sharing as a ONE WAY truth. Even again with your use of the word "period" in this statement. "Women submit to sex each time they have sex with a male period". Again a bold statement with an emphasis that you are totally and completely right, and that basically there is no changing of your mindset on this subject.
Perhaps, I am reading too much into this. But I believe, that many others on this message board, read into your words the same thing.
You clearly state that you are bothered that not too many people see things the way you do. That this topic has come up before, you have read the posts. Clearly you should have expected that your views on the matter would not be well recieved. Have you not reconsidered the reasons why many people do not see thing the way you do? Or Should everybody else suddenly wake up and see the world as you see it? Again, I suspect you knew ahead of time, that your post would not be so well recieved. Since you have read/seen previous discussions regarding "sex and submission" on here.
< Message edited by Owner4SexSlave -- 5/16/2008 8:39:30 AM >
|
RE: Submission and Sex - 
Profile
gets a refill and sits back to watch the show also....:) 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread