Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:09:00 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

That is an outrage,let the invasions start.

Let`s toss the Geneva Convention,Constitution,our good judgment out,while we torture guys into saying what we want,while we`re at it.


C`mon slaveboy.You know this looks bad and why.It`s not you(or me) that matters though.It`s how they (our hosts)view this,that matters.


I know it looks bad owner, but read the articles.  The Iraqis are saying he should "get the most severe" punishment possible, and for what?  For shooting a book. He's a young guy for fuck's sake, and they want to ruin his life for making a bad joke.  He fucked up, but I don't think there is any danger of there being a shortage of Qurans.  I frankly get a little sick of getting tolerance lessons from people that believe homosexuality and adultury warrants the death penalty. 

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:11:19 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
agree.... we don't need lecturing from those . But I guess our great white leaders...kneel for oil ;)

_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:13:03 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Quoi ?

reallyyy..is true is true..they didn't tell you?

_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:13:16 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Depends which treaty you're talking about. The fourth Geneva Convention states:

quote:



Part I. General Provisions
This sets out the overall parameters for GCIV:
  • Article 2 states that signatories are bound by the convention both in war, armed conflicts where war has not been declared and in an occupation of another country's territory.





Kittin, and there-in lies the problem, al qeada and the other terrorists are not "signatories" to it.
It's not a one way street.
You have to be a "signatory" to it to "benefit" from it.
That's the incentive.
The "carrot and the stick."

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:16:58 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
There was no Al Quaida in Iraq. What are you talking about? The treaty I mentioned is the IV GC - which concerns the rights of civilians under occupation by a foreign power. 

Couldn't be more fitting than this.

PS: and by the way, Iraq is a signatory of these treaties (ratified: 1956). As are the United States, of course (ratified: 1955). But let's not a contract be binding.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebSign?ReadForm&id=375&ps=P

< Message edited by kittinSol -- 5/20/2008 8:23:44 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:18:32 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq

the Iraq branch of El thingy was formed in 2003
http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/profiles/al-qaeda_in_iraq.htm


< Message edited by Justme696 -- 5/20/2008 8:20:19 AM >


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:22:01 AM   
calamitysandra


Posts: 1682
Joined: 3/17/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

And there lies the problem.


How is that a problem?  He didn't rape anyone, he didn't murder anyone.  He didn't seize the book from some Iraqi than play keep away with it before shooting it.  He shot a copy of the Quran.  Like I said, not too bright and he deserved an ass chewing over it.  But a court martial?  Give me a fucking break. 


I meant that the problem lies in what you assumed about this guy. If he really is like you think he is,

quote:


...probably 19-23 years old, and I don't expect guys that age to make the wisest decisions with their idle time.  I especially don't expect them to be the most sensitive people...


should he be over there, wielding a gun?

_____________________________

"Whenever people are laughing, they are generally not killing one another"
Alan Alda


(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:23:19 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Ah, but Kittin - the state of Iraq which may have signed the Convention, ended when the occupation started - at the defeat and disincorporation of that state.

Its the same kind of legal thinking that says that torture is permissible, since torture is not a punishment and so not forbidden by the US Constitution.

Laws, Conventions, Agreements and so on are rarely interpreted to be more than what suits at the time. And that sort of pragmatism requires the wholesale discarding of any claim to a moral high ground.

E



_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:23:50 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

There was no Al Quaida in Iraq. What are you talking about? The treaty I mentioned is the IV GC - which concerns the rights of civilians under occupation by a foreign power. 

Couldn't be more fitting than this.


Of course there is al qeada in Iraq.
Also "foreigners" from Iran, Syria and other countries! Quite a few from Suadi-Arabia on a "ji-had holiday."
Bush said two years ago that we need to secure Iraq's borders! lol
Meanwhile in his ***OWN*** country.....

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:25:02 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Call me naive, but I believe in respecting international treaties.

_____________________________



(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:26:53 AM   
calamitysandra


Posts: 1682
Joined: 3/17/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Depends which treaty you're talking about. The fourth Geneva Convention states:

quote:



Part I. General Provisions
This sets out the overall parameters for GCIV:
  • Article 2 states that signatories are bound by the convention both in war, armed conflicts where war has not been declared and in an occupation of another country's territory.






Kittin, and there-in lies the problem, al qeada and the other terrorists are not "signatories" to it.
It's not a one way street.
You have to be a "signatory" to it to "benefit" from it.
That's the incentive.
The "carrot and the stick."


And were, please point it out to me, does it state that? It says that you have to abide by the rules if you are a signatory. It does not state anywhere, that the other party has to be a signtory too, for the convention to apply.
Signatorys are bound, not signatories are bound if.

< Message edited by calamitysandra -- 5/20/2008 8:28:31 AM >


_____________________________

"Whenever people are laughing, they are generally not killing one another"
Alan Alda


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:28:22 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Call me naive, but I believe in respecting international treaties.


and so do our glorious leaders. But they believe far more in respecting how they might interpret such treaties for advantage.

And we also have to factor in, that every last letter of such treaties is enforceable only by violence, and he who has the greatest capacity for violence is therefore also the one whose interpretation will carry.

For right or for wrong.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:28:59 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
The link you attached shows that the 'Iraqi' operation was actually based in Egypt in 2003. Let's be serious here, please  : Al Quaida was absent from Iraq until the Americans arrived. It is a by-product of American policy.

_____________________________



(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:31:19 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

Ah, but Kittin - the state of Iraq which may have signed the Convention, ended when the occupation started - at the defeat and disincorporation of that state.


lol so if you conquer a country..all rules disappear? Well then we have no problems in Iraq anymore ;) we can all do what we want...and next week we go home

ok..that seriouly again. The one occupying Iraq signed the treaty too..so it counts. Besides that the US is a member of the security council. I suspect they have an example function in the world. (lots of guessing with Mr Bush leadin)
(although they have a rule in the US that the can invade The Netherlands when we arrest US war criminals to court......funny)


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:32:15 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
It looks as though you believe in nothing, LadyE. Please tell me you're not that cynical? I stick to my guns (haha!) : human rights rock my boat more than war and the murder of civilians.

_____________________________



(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:33:36 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

I meant that the problem lies in what you assumed about this guy. If he really is like you think he is,


I assume this because of what I read.  He's a staff Seargent, which is an E-6.  He's a sniper, so I imagine he's in a combat arms unit.  If he joined when he was 18 or 19, it shouldn't have been hard for him to make E-6 in a short time span in combat. 

quote:

should he be over there, wielding a gun? 


I didn't say he was stupid.  I said he did something stupid.  You never did anything stupid before?  People do things like this when they are in stressful situations.  My father told me a story about Vietnam once.  They had these annoying monkies over there that would steal things and jump out of trees and attack people.  So it was not uncommon for soldiers to open up and completely destroy a tree these monkeys were in.  Shit like that happens in war.  As long as it's not criminal behavior, I really don't care.  It's not a big deal, and could have been handled quietly without all of this controversy. 

(in reply to calamitysandra)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:34:24 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

The link you attached shows that the 'Iraqi' operation was actually based in Egypt in 2003. Let's be serious here, please  : Al Quaida was absent from Iraq until the Americans arrived. It is a by-product of American policy.


you had to read all ;)
yes there origin of their leaders is from several countries. And I agree with you..before the war they were hardly mentioned beeing from Iraq or beeing involved.
But that will be the next step of our sight seeing trip...Iran

_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:35:01 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

There was no Al Quaida in Iraq.



Of course there is al qeada in Iraq.



It's amazing the difference a little tense will make :-) .

_____________________________



(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:35:37 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
I'm saying Justme, that we can puff and blow and stamp our feet all we want and it will be to no avail whatever.

All of these rules, laws and regulations, agreements and treaties, conventions and so on are regularly interpreted to be whatever those in power wish them to be for their ends. We've seen it time and again - and it will ever be the same.

"Might maketh Right"

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice - 5/20/2008 8:37:11 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Call me naive, but I believe in respecting international treaties.


Well that's nice to know but a lot of people don't.
You can't go into wars, military actions, with your hands tied behind your back while the other guy doesn't have any restrictions.
And what ever happend to "shoot on site" for al qeada?
Now they,...."arrest"....them?
You can't ever let those people go.
When they get done questioning them they should be executed.
I don't agree with "International" treaties.
Look at that standing joke called the "U.N."
Look at NATO, it should have been disbanded 15 years ago.
When it's time to get out of these things there's always some type of "problem."
The State Dept never met a "treaty", "deal" or "organisation" that they didn't like!

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 5/20/2008 8:38:36 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: US soldier shoots at Quran for target practice Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.008