FLButtSlut
Posts: 344
Joined: 3/17/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SirSix72 most believe it is a symbiotic relationship...ie one cant be without the other...I disagree, am I not a Master even if I dont own a slave/sub........then other say how the symbosis is balanced between the two...isnt a sub a sub without a Master or vice versa? Actually, no you are not a "master" if you don't own a slave/sub, except for the master of yourself. I believe that is the whole point here. You are the master of your slave, you are not the master of the other sub/slaves here. While some masters (and all in the Gorean "realm") would allow you to master THEIR sub/slave, many others would knock your block off for taking such liberties with THEIR property. As for the second part of the statement, the answer is "it depends". I have never identified myself as a slave although I am proud to call some slaves that I do know friends (the same goes for masters that I know). Some are submissive in all areas of their life, including outside their household. On the other hand, some have very important careers where they are far from submissive and certainly don't "defer" to others as they are the ones in charge. When a sub/slave is without master, they can still be either based on those perspectives. In either case when not involved with someone else, in the most technical sense, we are simply people who seek to be a slave, or has submissive or dominent tendencies and desires or looking for someone to master. quote:
ORIGINAL: SirSix72 where did the tolerance go and the mutual respect goto? From your statements, it would seem that in *your* world there isn't any of either. Unless you count the slave "tolerating" anything their master chooses to do regardless of their own mental or physical capabilities. As for "mutual respect", I have yet to see you once offer any example of how a master should respect his slave, rather you present a very once sided view of respect. Sub/slaves give it and you take it. That is certainly not mutual respect. quote:
ORIGINAL: SirSix72 You would hold your patner back by limit setting? kinda ironic isnt it? Yet potentially damaging a partner by disregarding their limits is ok? Yes it is quite ironic. quote:
ORIGINAL: SirSix72 I thought this was about finding pleasure together without reservations? ..just trying to get an understanding here... Master Six That statement is a contradiction of all of your other statements. Perhaps an understanding would be more forthcoming for you if you didn't contradict yourself. If it is about finding "pleasure together" then obviously, all slaves/subs will have "limits" on what they seek in someone. If they didn't, then only one of you is finding the pleasure, the other is just the means to master's end. While certainly I'm sure there are those who would want to be unhappy and miserable and unsatisfied and unfufilled for the rest of their lives, I am happy to say that I have never met someone like that. PS to Bobbi, I KNOW how much you hate housework, and certainly I don't like it either, but saying "housework" is a hard limit? Admit it, you KNOW that is funny, if only because in most situations, unless there is maid service, and even in those situations where the work is shared, SOME housework needs to be done. By the way, how is the search for a houseboy going? Any luck yet?
|