Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CruelDesires There will be plenty of Men and Women who say they are allowed to wear the master title. Does that make them a master? I can call myself a duck. Does that make me a duck? As there will plenty of people who call themselves a slave. But in the way I understand M/s, once a slave decides to take a decision into their own hands like the Op has... and leaves the relationship "no matter what was written or contracted down" they are no longer slaves but are submissives. If they were slaves, they would have given up that right to make that decision when they gave over Absolute power to the master. If you define a slave as being owned property (by consent), then one can reasonably argue that her choosing to leave the relationship means she's no longer a slave; agreed. So yes, she's inherently submissive but she's also a mature adult, as one would hope of anyone consenting to be another's slave. What I find disturbing in your presentation and arguments is a consistent theme that you sanction leverage over consent. And you're sanitising yourself by casting doubt on everyone else's definitions of M/s; at least, those who own through consent. Master/slave is a powerful relationship dynamic. But it wouldn't feel empowering if the girl were trapped; not to ME. But having her serve and obey me through choice - THAT'S empowering! As others have said, I also wouldn't wanna own a slave who wasn't happy and fulfilled being my property - so she *always* has the choice to leave.... Or, as you put it yourself, she " has the rights her Master chooses to give her". quote:
Is that master deserving of that power? Most of them arent IMO. And some will abuse the power and use it to their own ends either foolishly or selfishly. And most might think exactly the same of you. Forcing a slave to stay, whether by physical barrier or coersion/leverage/manipulation/word-play/mind-games etc, might also constitute a selfish abuse of power, no? quote:
There is no "slippery slope" as you put it. These are my beliefs and the way I view things. I believe that Tops and Dominants and Masters are all different and have differing definitions. Just lumping them all under the word "Master" does our lifestyle a disservice. I wish CM would change the room heading or add an "Ask a Dominant" section as I don't see them as the same. Your beliefs read an awful lot like the "labels" you were bagging back up the page. While I also appreciate the differences between Master/Dom/Top (or slave/sub/bottom), one hardly needs a separate Forum for each and all. That's what you're given a brain for; to discern context and post your opinion accordingly. There are exponentially more shades than black or white.... Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|