chickpea
Posts: 446
Joined: 8/3/2005 From: Los Angeles Area Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Critical thinking? Listening to Obama talk like a preacher is not critical thinking. His speeches are amazing due to the fact he can go on for an hour talking about absolutely nothing and the people cheer likes he's the messiah. compared to Bush, he is the messiah. quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Critical thinking and being an informed voter means doing your own research. And the more research I do on Obama the less I like him. Example please! quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Everyone wants to vote Obama because they want CHANGE. Yet you ask one voter what CHANGE means and they have no idea. They just want CHANGE. For some reason people fail to realize that you could end up with someone much, much worse than George W. Bush. My cards are betting that Obama probably on the better-than-Bush side of the spectrum. And does that person exist??? Being worse than Bush??? That's like the Devil himself. Oh wait, Bush is still worse, he doesn't have superhuman powers and can't stay sober while committing the most hideous crimes the world has ever seen. quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 With McCain we will get more of the same. But with Obama, I think he will be worse than Jimmy Carter. Obama takes tough stands. That's just the same tactic rehashed from 2004. Trying to make the democratic presidential nominee look like a wimp. First, Obama has trashed Mccain throughout this election so far no matter what political game he tries to throw at him. I think Obama is tough because he rigidly sticks to his principles. If Obama were Louis Farrakan, then Chicago would be in trouble now... Fear mongering, fear mongering.. He's been so open and objective, and precise about everything. If anything, he'll be a very tough principled leader who'll get us out of the mess called Iraq. The world will once again respect the U.S. for doing what's right and trashing the Republicans. A world that doesn't hate the U.S. is a much safer world to live in. quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Presidents who refuse to take a tough stance against Americans enemies were either soundly defeated or were assassinated. They are very, very weak presidents (Carter, Nixon, JFK). JFK was a weak president? LMAO how bout the Cuban Missle Crisis?? quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Presidents who are strong and win wars and take a tough stance become great presidents (Lincoln, FDR, Reagan). Let's see Bush is a LOSER he lost the Iraq war...ehrm maybe because he's STUPID and CAN'T MANAGE THINGS? Reagan, managed to stop the cold war by being smart...using sound judgement actually having negotiating skills (have you ever seen Not a gung ho, gun-totting, jingoist...like *ehrm* Bush. Bush talk sensibly with another world leader? He's just covering up his lack of intellect and negotiating skills by saying, "oh, i don't need to negotiate, that's weak." Negotiation is part of being a world leader....talking sensibly to other world leaders you may not disagree with. Not wrecklessly and thoughtlessly spending trillions blowing up everything you see in sight, and pissing the rest of the world off. quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 Obama is going to be weak. He will be an appeaser. And he will be the next Jimmy Carter. And under his administration, we will have at least one new nuclear power in the mid-east to cause more problems. Obama has been very strong against John Mccain (the supposedly strong one) this election. As far as nuclear weapons.... none in Iraq. And weakening Iraq, gives Iran a much greater advantage in the balance of power... and an edge in developing nuclear weapons. Bush needs to think before he acts. He's an idiot.
|