Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Although I don't share SB's disdain for NASCAR, I cannot disagree with his position. I don't see what the big deal is when a celebrity dies. You didn't know them, they were not your kinfolk. People cried when JFK got shot, why ? But FYI NASCAR is about alot more than driving around in a circle. They are comstantly doing research about every aspect of driving machines, from the suspension, steering geometry, gear ratios and of course the engine. Racing professionals have done more to make your car safer, faster and handle better than the auto manufacturers. But all you generally see is the driver. There is some skill involved. It is more than just driving around in a circle, it takes stategy and balls to win a race. It is like getting ahead of a traffic jam, and the other drivers are worse than drivers on the highway who won't let you pass, that is their job. You have to see the opening and take it, and put it right in their face, or fender as it were. You crash me, you might crash too, so get the fuck out of the way. It is a contest, and like any other there are risks. But what you don't see is the hundreds of professionals who built the car, the implement used in the competition. There are so many restrictions on displacement, weight and other things that when those engineers get a few more HP out of it, or improve the suspension/steering system ever so slightly, that can help win a race. That is if the driver is able to pull it off. They are a team, but not all of them actually take the risk. Therefore they don't get the headlines. I knew a guy (now deceased) who worked for big daddy Don Garlitz. That was no clain to fame in my book. Interesting to note, but that's all. The things he told me about it, the driver is somewhat like the quarterback in football. He can't play the game alone. And when the new camshaft comes in from the heat treater at nine PM you work at night. You have that engine torn down by the time the truck arrives, and you work until the new cam is in, then it gets put on the dynomometer and if the cam outperforms the old one you get to go home. Otherwise you stay and put the old one back in. And I know that a stock car is anything but. It is a fiberglass shell on top of the frame, but it must meet the design specifications of whatever body style is chosen. Nothing underneath bears any resemblence to a "stock" car. I have no love for celebrities. Even George Carlin. But NASCAR and the other racing organisations have contributed alot to modern automobile technology. You have them to thank when you punch your car and pass that truck just in time to not be a spot on the wall. When you come up on something stranded in the road and steer clear of it just barely in time to avoid an accident, same people. If you're old enough to remember how cars were you can appreciate this alot more. I was born in 1960, but I did get a chance to drive a 1950 Chevy. It's a pain in the fucking ass. Crankomatic steering, not properly compensated for any tilt in the road, and wind blowing it all over the place. And then you are dealing with an unsynchronized transmission which means you either double clutch or you really have to know what you're doing. Back then you didn't let the kids drive simply because they couldn't do it. But now you get in the car at zero degrees, it flick starts and you can drive right away. You put your coffee or beer in the cupholder and rock out of the pile of snow. When you get on the main road it is all wet, but you can have some measure of confidence because technology makes it so the steering is right, and if you lose some traction it is usually easily regained. This is all technology folks, and a bunch of it comes from the research done for racing. I am not a fan of NASCAR, or actually of anything else. I give reverence to nothing, it is just what they do. They do it for money. But I do give credit where credit is due. We would not have what we have without NASCAR and a few others. T
|