WarriorsGirl
Posts: 20
Joined: 3/22/2008 Status: offline
|
Well, given my username here, I feel compelled to post. By definition, a warrior is someone who engages in warfare, plain and simple, and typically shows courage in the battlefield. To go a step further, in my opinion, a great warrior shows empathy for his opponents. Bipolarber, I am confident in saying that many of today's warriors, the ones that are out there fighting every day in battles that statesmen have ordered them into, would be the first ones to happily lay down their weapons in exchange for a world without the tragedy of war. Diplomacy would always be the first choice of any good warrior, in my opinion. I think what being a great warrior comes down to is courage. Not only the courage to fight when called upon, but the courage to set aside one's own comforts to ensure the safety of others, the courage to admit fear, and the courage to face the inner turmoil that being in that place of responsibility for the lives of others can cause. I used to make the same blanket assessment of warfare as you. I have learned that it's just too complicated a matter to pass unilateral judgment. Hlen5, I rather liked your post. I know I went a little bit more into it than I should have. It's just obviously an important subject to me. That profile that included the story of the pillaging warrior bringing slaves back to their land is a fanciful notion based on how that person defines power and courage, not on the reality of what the word actually means. Common misconception and trend can actually change the meanings of words and though that is part of the evolution of language, oh it drives me nuts. Vegetarians don't eat fish, "went missing" is grammatically impossible, and warriors are not essentially plundering thugs.
|