IvyMorgan
Posts: 729
Joined: 7/5/2007 From: Midlands, UK Status: offline
|
I was off to a munch yesterday, and travelling up, I was asked by a friend of mine, did I think submissives had more control in a scene than was often thought. I thought about it for all of a few seconds and then gave the same answer I always have. A submissive (and I'm using this term to apply to whomever is on the "bottom" in a given moment) is always the one in ultimate control. He asked why, and I said... "Either the dominant is playing only as far as the submissive can take, so the submissive is in control, you rarely if ever hear dominants saying 'I want to/I did play as hard and as far and as long as I liked, screw the sub' whilst you tend to always hear, 'I watch my sub carefully and go only as far as they can take', 'my slave doesn't have a safeword, but I only push her as far as she can go' and so on. So those subs are in control in a round about way. Or you have a submissive with a scripted/negotiated scene, for example in public. Think of what percentage of public scenes end in a safe word... 50%, higher? In those scenarios, there's no pretense, the submissive is drawing the line of what goes and what doesn't. How many times does a dominant safeword, compared to a sub? Either a scene stops cos a sub says so directly, or because the dominant deems the sub has had enough, or because both have reached the place where they want to go. The submissive is always in control." He agreed, but, I'm wondering if anyone else does? Who is in control of your "play" relationship? When you take it apart, I mean.
|