TallDarkAndWitty
Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004 From: Rochester, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW I hope that nobody minds a rather long response to this. I find this topic fascinating. Yeah, me too! :) quote:
I would replace the last concept with the concept of 'power' or 'energy' Meh. I have no problem with either of your words, but they don't carry anything additional for me. Power and Energy are simply the resultant products of Force. And Force, for me can imply things that are not dynamic, such as the force of the rope that holds one still or the force of a gag that keeps one silent. quote:
That being said, Service -cannot- be a desire to please someone else... ----snip---- The pleasure of service, if this is the core motivation, comes from a job well done, and the knowledge that life has been made easier for another. These two statements seem contradictory. Are you saying the pleasure of service comes from doing the job, and not the pleasing of others? Seems a mighty small nit to pick... quote:
I would replace this with "intensity". I am would be ok with this change, as it would allow fear to be part of the activities without trying to stretch the definition of Pain, but I think it is too non-specific. Intensity is a measure of something, it isn't something. Force can be intense, without being painful. Ownership can be intense without being painful. And remember, I am talking about Pain (and indicator) and not pain (a feeling of ouchiness). Pain is a place holder for a number of activities which are mostly painful. Some are not, but most are. I disagree that pain/intensity is an externally driven motivation I wish I had left the internal/external stuff out as it makes no difference in my index...it just sorta popped into my head as I was writing. Let's leave that conversation for another day... quote:
+Service, +Intensity, +Ownership, +Power: The Slave I like this, but we will get the same crap from people who call themselves "slaves" as I have been getting from people who call themselves "bottoms". I think overloading the term "The Slave" might be a bad idea. quote:
+Service, +Intensity, +Ownership, -Power: The Bond-Servant I have never heard this term before, and I love it. I might go with Bond-Slave, keeping the Ownership indicator aligned with "slave". If you want to write a 75 word description of this archetype however, I will keep it "The Bond-Servant". ;) quote:
+Service, -Intensity, +Ownership, +Power: The Zen Servant I am not getting this one...'splain, please. quote:
+Service, -Intensity, -Ownership, +Power: The Guided Servant Meh...I don't hate it. Again, a 75 word description and I would take this one. quote:
+Service, -Intensity, -Ownership, -Power: The Sacred Prostitute I don't get this one at all. When I think of a pure service submissive, I see Alfred the Butler. quote:
-Service, +Intensity, +Ownership, +Power: The Bleeding Captive Where is the ownership in this name? Captives don't want to be there...this archetype needs to feel owned, not just controlled. quote:
-Service, +Intensity, -Ownership, -Power: The Intensity Slut Meh. My name is much more visual. quote:
-Service, -Intensity, +Ownership, +Power: The Trophy Husband/Wife I like mine more. I don't see where Force comes into "The Trophy Husband/Wife". quote:
-Service, -Intensity, -Ownership, +Power: The Acolyte Don't get this one, but I have pretty much settled on "The Victim" for this one. quote:
-Service, -Intensity, -Ownership, -Force: The Undiscovered Ok, maybe...but in order to get this score, you pretty much have to not like any BDSM activities. But I know how BDSMers hate to be called vanilla... Thanks for the thoughts!!! Taggard
< Message edited by TallDarkAndWitty -- 9/2/2008 1:51:36 PM >
_____________________________
A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed. My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com
|