compes -> RE: Religion (8/22/2004 7:08:35 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: knees2you Newflowers, as i mentioned in the old Testament, God states that his word is Law and His word can not be Broken. But if You want to Believe in Transedentalists, Then Your life is in Your hands, Not the Creator. Someone show me proof of the Big bang Theory??? Not gonna Happen. Even Professor Richard r. Dawkins a leading Atheist. {For most leading Atheist. Say's And I Quote~~} We could not have gotten here by chance~ Sincerely, Anthony[;)] Your quote of Dawkins is not quite correct. Let's put it into context, shall we? From The Improbability of God quote:
We can safely conclude that living bodies are billions of times too complicated - too statistically improbable - to have come into being by sheer chance. How, then, did they come into being? The answer is that chance enters into the story, but not a single, monolithic act of chance. Instead, a whole series of tiny chance steps, each one small enough to be a believable product of its predecessor, occurred one after the other in sequence. These small steps of chance are caused by genetic mutations, random changes - mistakes really - in the genetic material. They give rise to changes in the existing bodily structure. Most of these changes are deleterious and lead to death. A minority of them turn out to be slight improvements, leading to increased survival and reproduction. By this process of natural selection, those random changes that turn out to be beneficial eventually spread through the species and become the norm. Would you like to talk about un-provable things? Then I think we should also talk about the existence of the utmost holy Invisible Pink Unicorn As for proof of the big bang - well, there is a LOT of evidence that the universe that we inhabit started out very small once. How small is currently being debated - there are proponents of a big bang, and a newer group that seems to have better evidence of a 'big whoosh' - based on string theory. If you're interested, see the article in the Scientific American Magazine. I don't think it would be wise for you to start knocking the theories that science uses to explain and understand the world - these theories keep your house heated, your car running, and your computer connected to the Internet. Besides, if scientific principles can be so easily discarded because they are "only theories" then too can biblical "theories." For instance, it is easily arguable that the creation story in Genesis is only a 'theory'. quote:
Now, it is important for us to understand that no one was actually present at the creation so we don't really know what happened. Genesis 1:1-3 is only a theory, and as such cannot be treated as fact. And it is only fair that I share with you that there are other theories of the creation. For example, some Sumerians and Babylonians, Gilbert Islanders, Koreans, and Greeks believed that the world was created from the parts of a slain monster; some Zuni Indians, Cook Islanders, and Tahitians have a theory that the world was created by the interaction of primordial parents; and some Japanese, Samoan, Persian, Chinese, and Hindu have a theory that the world was generated from an egg." And, of course, there is that dogma being foisted upon us by the liberal media and intelligentsia, the theory of evolution. Compes
|
|
|
|