Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Missokyst Sometimes reading between the lines is filling it in with data that doesnt fit. Weeeell, only if you're into consciously deluding yourself, or others.... lol If you don't believe in reading between the lines, then you give no credence to "instinct" or "gut feeling", either? How 'bout when people lie by omission - I mean, if you rely solely on what's actually presented.... And you've never felt someone is overtly lying or trying to deceive you - not even once? And if you did, how did you "know" something wasn't right? One thing I've learnt from life experience is that, even when an explanation "seems" unlikely or "out there", the truth has a mighty consistent habit of sounding a whole lot like the truth. But when that explanation feels like hokum, what you're doing is *reading between the lines*, no? I'd defy anyone to make everyday judgement calls without a level of "reading between the lines". You almost never have all the available information! And it's absurdly naive to advocate a public community Forum should be held to such an impossibly high standard. People come here and ask advice; ask for an *opinion* - and that's all you can give. If you're gonna confine yourself specifically to the (usually limited) given information, then you may as well copy/paste "it depends" every single reply.... Or you can go the extra mile with what you *think* (reading between the lines et al) and let the OP decide what's relevant and what to ignore. A court of law found OJ Simpson innoc.... errr..., not guilty. I imagine everyone who thinks that verdict was a travesty must've been direct eyewitness to what actually unfolded. That, or....? Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|