tsatske
Posts: 2037
Joined: 3/9/2007 From: Louisville, KY Status: offline
|
I don't have a study for you and I don't think you will find one. Society isn't ready to look that closely at WIITWD. To me, the definition of consent, when you are trying to sort out the difference between BDSM relationships that include physical play (so many here keep pointing out that not all do), and physically abusive relationships, is something like this: Yes, with very few exceptions (there are women out there being out and out coerced to stay) the vast majority of victims are indeed 'voting with their feet' when they consent to stay. So how am I different from them? I'm happy. If you ask a woman, 'would you be happier in your relationship without the entire element that includes the beatings?" Those who are consentual will say No, I don't want the beatings to stop, morale was just begining to improve And those being abused will say, 'Of course I'd be happier if he wasn't beating me! What kind of stupid question is that!' Yes, some would have complex versions of those answers. Some women might be in consentual relationships where they agree to tolerate beating, although they don't actually like being beaten, but they like the D/s, or some other aspect. So, they might say, 'well, if he could still Master me, if He would be just as happy with me serving him in other ways, I suppose i would like it if i didn't have to get beaten, ....', but the answer points out the clear consent involved. A woman in an abusive relationship might say, 'Hell, that's the only time he pays attention to me.' again, the answer makes clear the dynamics of the relationship. However, if you used my model in an actual study, you could simply throw out those types of answers as too abigous.
_____________________________
“If you never did you should. These things are fun and fun is good” ~Dr. Seuss quote
|