Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama plan a blast from the past.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:02:36 AM   
bestbabync


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline
mrbob

i think that $2million is just more spreading the wealth....LOL!

_____________________________

"A woman is the only thing I am afraid of that I know will not hurt me" Abraham Lincoln
"Choose Life, your mother did!"
www.howobamagotelected.com
http://www.lp.org/platform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2CaBR3z85c

(in reply to mrbob726)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:08:30 AM   
mrbob726


Posts: 155
Joined: 4/15/2007
From: Illinois
Status: offline
I guess I should feel fortunate that I don't have enough wealth to speak of for Obama to spread. 

_____________________________

"Love many, Trust few, Harm none" (Yau Man, Survivor Fiji)

"If builders built buildings the way some programmers write programs, the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization."

(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:11:19 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bestbabync

Lady,

i am sorry to hear about your business situation.  but what you have just told me justifies my thoughts.  raising taxes on america's small business (causing them to have even less money) now can only make things worse and not better. 

if you knew that your taxes were being raised beginning in Jan 2009, how many more of your employees would you have to terminate?


Taxes are not the be all and end all though. All other factors remaining the same, increased taxes would be a problem, but if interest rates for example come down, then that offsets the effect of increased taxes. Its too simplistic to look at one aspect of the economy and draw conclusions.

And as I understood it, the tax rise in question here is hardly going to apply to small business owners so much - and even then we're talking about a minute change, not a sudden new imposition or a heavy burden that will threaten anyone's job as much as continuing with the current system or doing nothing.

As to your question, it would really depend on the size of the increase in tax. But since it would apply to everyone - all my competitors, and the tax only applies to my profit it is unclear whether any adverse effect would result at all. The next year or so will be about survival, not making profits - indeed this is why incomes are being looked at rather than business profits from which the tax take is set to fall as fewer make a profit at all.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:23:21 AM   
bestbabync


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bestbabync

Lady,

i am sorry to hear about your business situation.  but what you have just told me justifies my thoughts.  raising taxes on america's small business (causing them to have even less money) now can only make things worse and not better. 

if you knew that your taxes were being raised beginning in Jan 2009, how many more of your employees would you have to terminate?


Taxes are not the be all and end all though. All other factors remaining the same, increased taxes would be a problem, but if interest rates for example come down, then that offsets the effect of increased taxes. Its too simplistic to look at one aspect of the economy and draw conclusions.

And as I understood it, the tax rise in question here is hardly going to apply to small business owners so much - and even then we're talking about a minute change, not a sudden new imposition or a heavy burden that will threaten anyone's job as much as continuing with the current system or doing nothing.

As to your question, it would really depend on the size of the increase in tax. But since it would apply to everyone - all my competitors, and the tax only applies to my profit it is unclear whether any adverse effect would result at all. The next year or so will be about survival, not making profits - indeed this is why incomes are being looked at rather than business profits from which the tax take is set to fall as fewer make a profit at all.

E


the tax hike has been predicted by the democratic VP candidate to begin on those earning $150,000 for a single person and $200,000 for the married.  in this country that will more than likely cause all small business owners to pay more taxes during a recession.

_____________________________

"A woman is the only thing I am afraid of that I know will not hurt me" Abraham Lincoln
"Choose Life, your mother did!"
www.howobamagotelected.com
http://www.lp.org/platform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2CaBR3z85c

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:29:55 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
And what do they pay now on a $150k income and what will they pay under Obama's plan, bearing in mind its a progressive system?

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 10:44:36 AM   
bestbabync


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline
 
from what i understand personal/income tax will increase under Obama from 35% to 39.6%.   i think many foresee business owners cutting back in their business to compensate for the increase in personal tax hike.

_____________________________

"A woman is the only thing I am afraid of that I know will not hurt me" Abraham Lincoln
"Choose Life, your mother did!"
www.howobamagotelected.com
http://www.lp.org/platform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2CaBR3z85c

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 11:38:33 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bestbabync

the tax hike has been predicted by the democratic VP candidate to begin on those earning $150,000 for a single person and $200,000 for the married.  in this country that will more than likely cause all small business owners to pay more taxes during a recession.


Biden was mistaken and the Obama camp has already cleared it up. They're all tired, McCain misspeaks, Palin misspeaks .. they all do it. It's been a long campaign. Cut the humans a bit of slack for being human and flawed, k? Have you never had a slip of the tongue (or finger like in another thread where you just apologized for a typo?)

Personal income tax hikes begin at $250,000 for couples, $200,000 single but it is still progressive. You are also mistaken in that 'all small business owners' will pay more taxes during a recession. New businesses will have zero capital gains which encourages start ups and creates jobs. In regard to small business ... the personal income tax rate applies to personal income drawn as a salary from that business. The business profit itself is taxed at a different rate than personal income taxes and the tax rate of one has nothing to do with the other.

Taxes and small business from factcheck.

"The actual number of business owners who would be affected turns out to be well under a million, and the number of employers would be even less. Based on the number of taxpayers who now report any sort of business income on their returns, the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center projects that 663,608 taxpayers with business income, or business losses, will fall into the top two tax brackets in 2009, when any Obama tax changes would first take effect. Not all of those can properly be called "small-business owners," however. Some are farmers. Many are lawyers, accountants or other professionals who get some of their income in the form of partnership distributions. Others may be passive investors in real-estate partnerships or similar investment arrangements and not really persons who own and manage a business."


_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 1:02:14 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mrbob726

The decreased taxes SHOULD have resulted in decreased cost of goods and services. There were a lot of other factors involved, including the cost of loans that businesses need to operate. Back in 2000, wall street and the mortgage industry was deregulated. It took a while for the results to be felt, especially because the Fed kept playing with interest rates; whenever the stock market faltered, Greenspan was right there to manipulate the money supply. Reduced taxes may not have decreased cost of goods and services, but there's no way in hell that the wealthy corporate types are going to take a pay cut (in taxes) without passing it on to consumers. My own opinion is that the socialistic interference by the government is what got us in trouble to start with. Obama isn't going to fix that; it will be the same, only much more. I will not be voting for "that one". I'm not proud of what Bush has done, but tarring McCain with the "Bush brush" isn't the answer. Now the lefties are complaining about $150,000 supposedly spent on Governor Palin's wardrobe. That's peanuts compared to the upwards of $2 million Mr. O is going to be spending out of campaign funds for a big party in Chicago's Grant Park on Tuesday night, win or lose. Did you give to Obama's campaign so he could throw a party? I live close enough to Chicago to know the kind of heavy (crooked) politico's that are supporting the "one" to know I want no part of him, or them.


That was quite a few different points packed into one short paragraph, so let me see if I'm understanding what you are saying.

Your first point, if I'm understanding correctly, is that deregulation is beneficial but we just didn't give it enough time.  Only deregulation of Wall Street and the banking and mortgage industry did not begin in 2000, as you claim. It can be traced back to Reagan's first term.  If  you saw the recent Congressional hearings then you saw Greenspan admit that he was wrong about deregulation.

As far as your second point, which, again correct me if I'm wrong, was that increased corporate taxes are going to be passed on to the consumer.  I believe that's true, but only to a certain degree.  You only raise prices so far before you lose sales to competition or you decrease overall demand due to the high prices. 

The fact is we have reached an enormous level of national debt and we have to increase taxes to pay it down.  Where should that burden rest?  On those who can least afford it or those who make in excess of $250k a year, who may have to scale back on discretionary spending but will be in no danger of  becoming destitute.

As far as "tarring McCain with the Bush brush", he has done that to himself.  Even the policies that he previously opposed Bush on, the tax cuts for example, he reversed himself on (flip-flopped) in order to appease the far right of his party.

Yes, $150K is peanuts in presidential politics.  It's not peanuts to "Joe six-pack" that Sarah Palin claims to be just like.  Not only is it laughingly ironic, it is the epitome of hypocrisy to claim you are just like the average American and then spend more on a wardrobe than many average Americans' homes are worth.

Your next point is just irrelevant unless you want to complain about the post-election event McCain will be having, Bush had, Kerry had, Gore had, Clinton had etc., etc..  Whether these events are justified or not, you can't single Obama out for planning it.

As for your last point, I lived in Chicago.  I'm truly tired of hearing about how supposedly corrupt the politics are from those who live "close enough" to Chicago.  It's no more or less corrupt than any other major city.  Kind of reminds me of someone who said they had foreign policy experience because they could see Russia from their doorstep. 


(in reply to mrbob726)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 1:23:00 PM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mrbob726

Quick reply to the thread in general -When Mr. Obama raises taxes on corporations and the wealthy, who in fact will pay those taxes ? The CEO's and businesses will pass them along to all of us in the form of increased cost of goods and services. In fact, an increased tax for the wealthy is an increased tax for us all. Think about it -
Edited to add, NO, I'm not wealthy, nor do I own a business.



No, they will their increase in taxes to raise prices. The raise in taxes is not the cause of increase in prices. Someone in business generally wants to make as much as they can and they will price their goods as high as you are willing to pay for it. As soon as you and other stop buying the products the price will go down regardless of taxes.

Beyond the demand for products and the drive to make money, prices are also a factor of the cost of materials used to make goods or offer services. Again this is a matter of supply and demand.

Now business goes to get lengths to lower their costs and drive up your desire for their goods so they can increase prices and make more money. That's why advertising is so valuable to businesses. It helps create a false sense of "need" and desire for products and services. Thus cost of advertising is also a factor in price.

The target market is also a factor in price. If you want to claim you sell luxury goods, you must have high prices or risk your market thinking your product is too "cheap" for them. Luxury goods are used to created status so folks are willing to pay a lot of the products as long as they believe said product sends a message about them.

If you offer a product for a small but necessary market, such as to cater to allergies, you can get away with crazy pricing. In a slightly related vein if your market feels it needs a product or that it is a minority, such as fetishes or kink, you can increase prices again. You, the business, can hold your market captive by catering to their fears and needs. The only reasons prices go do are because demand decreases (advertise to counter that) or because competition begins.

Taxes are a very, very small part of why prices are what they are. To believe otherwise is to drink the corporate koolaid.


_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to mrbob726)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 1:25:47 PM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bestbabync

 
from what i understand personal/income tax will increase under Obama from 35% to 39.6%.   i think many foresee business owners cutting back in their business to compensate for the increase in personal tax hike.


I'd say if such a small increase forces them out of business or to cut employees then they need to go back to business school or learn to sell their products better. Plus you aren't thinking about how coping with health care and making it more affordable might counter any tax increase.

I suppose you aren't talking about McCain because he has very very few things to say about any of this?

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 2:05:42 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Those are just their campaign promises. Down the road, the Democrats promise even more deficit spendng combined with much larger tax increases.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 3:55:24 PM   
bestbabync


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline
no matter what Obama is gonna win,right?  he will inherit a country with the world's second highest corporate tax rate at 35%.  raising anyones taxes in that country during a recession is bad.  i guess we will all just sit, watch & wait for the inevitable.

_____________________________

"A woman is the only thing I am afraid of that I know will not hurt me" Abraham Lincoln
"Choose Life, your mother did!"
www.howobamagotelected.com
http://www.lp.org/platform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2CaBR3z85c

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 7:22:24 PM   
Sadista


Posts: 16
Joined: 6/9/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

It's odd that more people aren't aware that Obama's plan is the same frickin' plan that prolonged the great depression... and it's also extremely odd that so many people fear knowledge of that.

It's as though they're admitting that people have to be ignorant of such facts if they are to vote for their cult-of-personality candidate. It's like they want a faltering economy... they must figure they can cause a crash and just blame it all on Bush.

quote:



After reading this how can you want to vote for McCain? http://www.ctj.org/pdf/obamataxhikemyth.pdf

The rest of this is just My opinion.

What most people are forgeting is that the same financial irresponcibility of the banks created the depression and tax plans and social "communism" ( neighbors helping each other)  and governments partial socialism (the new deal)  recorse rescued America from the plague of .

The banks did the same thing they did in 1929 gave out more money than they could afford to cover. 

As far as the cult of personality candidate goes... Bush was the New Elite John Wayne remember.. We didn't fuck with texas and texas fucked us so he could swim in the oil of the middle east since he couldn't seem to get his own oil companies up.

Now we actually have a candidate who IS actually for the people and fixing the economy and getting money back into circulation i.e your pockets you hate him more. It makes no since.

I guess the saying "the devil you know.."  means we're all willing to face poverty, famine, and national humiliation than have a black man in office.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 7:29:08 PM   
bestbabync


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline


sorry hon....but the plan will not work.  taking money from 1% of the people in this country to give to the poor poor pitiful 99% of us will not work!

_____________________________

"A woman is the only thing I am afraid of that I know will not hurt me" Abraham Lincoln
"Choose Life, your mother did!"
www.howobamagotelected.com
http://www.lp.org/platform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2CaBR3z85c

(in reply to Sadista)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. - 10/30/2008 9:29:08 PM   
BlackPhx


Posts: 3432
Joined: 11/8/2006
Status: offline
Well lots of stuff bandied about. The original post was correct, Obama's plan is not new. And it is true if actions were not taken with the new deal the depression might have ended a whole lot sooner, though if history is a measure it would have ended in another Revolution and most likely a Communist Revolution like in Russia or a kind of social anarchy and Empire that happened in France. In either case property and lives would have been lost en mass and total redistribution of wealth by force would take place. Even die hard capitalist understand the inequity between workers and owners will cause social unrest eventually. This is why we engage in civil redistribution of wealth from time to time to prevent the dissolution of the union or the bloody strife of putting down insurrection of the desperate. Both policies are flawed and cyclical both contain elements that are need to be sucessful. We in the United States have an odd tax structure yes it has one of the highest corperate tax rates but it is also the country with the highest number of loopholes the actual tax rate is much lower then the top rate assuming business are smart enough to take advantage of the loopholes (and most sucessful business do).  The effective corperate tax rate in the US is actually much lower then many of the other countries. If Obama can keep his promise to give additional loopholes for business that invest in the US then a small business or corperation willing to set up shop in the US could actually realize a tax cut instead of a tax increase. I have my faith business will do well under either canidate if they are adaptable, smart and pay attention to changes in the tax code.  Frankly, I keep saying there is little differance between the canidates. The both are involved in redistribution of wealth, both are big governement, big spend, big tax (indirectly), improve health care, become energy independent, etc, etc, etc. The reality what is needed is a hybrid of both plans, cut for taxes that create incentives to create business in  the US instead of shipping wealth overseas, making more middle and lower class citizens owners of assets, increase of opportunities for all. We need to build the country from both the top and from the bottom together. Reward those who work to make the country better, and punish those looking to manipulate the system for a free ride (like CEO's insurance companies & welfare abusers). But, we will not get that from either canidate so we have to elect on other considerations.

Respectively
BlackPhx 

(in reply to bestbabync)
Profile   Post #: 95
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Obama plan a blast from the past. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094