RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


rexrgisformidoni -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 8:42:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HagiaSophia

quote:

ORIGINAL: rexrgisformidoni

quote:

ORIGINAL: bluepanda

I absolutely loathe George Bush - consider him one of the most thoroughly despicable human beings ever to draw breath, and I have never considered him "my" president. I don't care how many other people voted for him; he is not morally, ethically, or intellectually fit to hold any public office higher than notary public, and frankly I'm not even too sure about that. I wouldn't give that slimy little reptile the benefit of the doubt  on anything, regardless of that impressive seal on the front of his podium.

So it doesn't surprise or anger me in any way if there are others who now feel the same way about Obama. Doesn't matter. It's not a repudiation of democracy in any way, as far as I'm concerned. Just as Bush did what he did for the last 8 years, whether I  approved or not, Obama will now do whatever he's  going to do for the next 4, or 8, regardless of what the people who dislike him think of the matter. C'est la vie. In 4 years, they'll get another chance to vote against him like I voted twice against Bush, and if they can persuade enough of their friends and neighbors to vote the same way, they'll get their wish. But until and unless they are able to do that, I really don't give a flying fuck what any of them think of Obama, any more than any of them gave a rat's ass what I thought of Bush. I had to live with 8 years of Bush, now they've got to live with 4 (or 8) years of Obama. Fuck 'em. 


Angry much? He may be an idiot, but damn. Personally, I think democracy in the country is a joke. It doesnt work in a society of 315 million people.



The last eight years were worth it, in light of the fact that we just elected the first minority President, and that we did it because he was the most qualified candidate. We are the first Western country to elect a racial minority to the highest office in our country. It's proof that democracy does work - it just doesn't work quickly. And it shouldn't. Efficient, quick-moving governments tend to be fascist governments. Democracy takes time.

And what's wrong with being angry at a President and party that have caused the debasement of the Constitution, the degradation of America's reputation internationally, a party unable to understand what "socialism" and "redistribution of wealth" actually mean, a party that outed our own operatives in the field, a party that is responsible for more than doubling the national debt in a trumped up Texas tea party that has cost us dearly paid blood and treasure so that we're all bailing out the commercial banking industry, the oil corporations are making record-breaking profits. Why shouldn't we be angry - we should be outraged at the poor stewardship of the Republicans over the last 8 years. But, we get the government we deserve. I think, after this last election, we deserve a much better government, and we're going to get it. To go back to the main idea - it is our responsibility as Americans to hold our government to high standards. When we don't, we get Grants, Hoovers and Bushes for 8 years. When we do (often in times of crisis) we get our FDRs.



I am disappointed for sure, but anger is meaningless without something for me to vent it at. And for me that means a living person or a kitten or something. If anything though I am more angry at the populace for this colossal clusterfuck of a country we live in. We can not agree on anything, we have zero sense of a common purpose. Personally I'd like a government that works alot quicker than what we have now. So call me a fascist. and how can we hold the government to high standards when the ones we have for our fellows have fallen so low.  But whatever, you have your opinion.




HagiaSophia -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 9:25:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rexrgisformidoni

I am disappointed for sure, but anger is meaningless without something for me to vent it at. And for me that means a living person or a kitten or something. If anything though I am more angry at the populace for this colossal clusterfuck of a country we live in. We can not agree on anything, we have zero sense of a common purpose. Personally I'd like a government that works alot quicker than what we have now. So call me a fascist. and how can we hold the government to high standards when the ones we have for our fellows have fallen so low.  But whatever, you have your opinion.



Our "government" works, administrations (and congressional installations) screw up. What we've had was an administration that didn't work. Any functional administration will work faster than one that's fundamentally broken or permanently on vacation. Wanting an administration that actually works doesn't make you a fascist.




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 9:47:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

After all, it's damn confusing.

I hear people claiming Washington should listen to the people. So we have this election, and the people--as well as the Electoral College numbers--clearly elect Barack Obama. Not an unknown (this has been going on forever), and not easily (he first had to win over his own party in the primaries, which he did). Several experienced people endorsed him, from both major parties.

He ran a disciplined, organized, focused, well-resourced campaign. And after becoming President-Elect, he's clearly surrounded himself for quite some time with damn impressive advisors (just check out his economic advisory board).

And certainly patriotic Americans, after duly electing the choice of the people, would follow their President, at least for his term, yes?

Apparently not. Many people have said, "OK, I didn't vote for him, but he's the President"--including John McCain. Many others here persist in language more appropriate for before the election.

So just what makes those folks experts? Why is America great except when it disagrees with an individual's vote? And why aren't these unusually wise people Presidential advisors or candidates themselves?

And if they don't like American democracy, what exactly do they propose? Because it sounds to me like they'd like a dictatorship, just that they can't agree on the dictator.

But then, I'm confused, so hopefully the smart people will explain it to me.

Thank you for doing so!





quite simply, it's where a bunch of middle and lower class of people vote for people who are basically figureheads (like the Queen of England) meanwhile the wealthy of the country control the actions of said person from behind the scenes. (my take on American politics)




MzMia -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 9:54:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HagiaSophia

quote:

ORIGINAL: rexrgisformidoni

I am disappointed for sure, but anger is meaningless without something for me to vent it at. And for me that means a living person or a kitten or something. If anything though I am more angry at the populace for this colossal clusterfuck of a country we live in. We can not agree on anything, we have zero sense of a common purpose. Personally I'd like a government that works alot quicker than what we have now. So call me a fascist. and how can we hold the government to high standards when the ones we have for our fellows have fallen so low.  But whatever, you have your opinion.



Our "government" works, administrations (and congressional installations) screw up. What we've had was an administration that didn't work. Any functional administration will work faster than one that's fundamentally broken or permanently on vacation. Wanting an administration that actually works doesn't make you a fascist.



**Waving to the lovely Sophia**
I enjoy reading your posts, and I hope you will become a regular

and frequent poster!
[;)]




hizgeorgiapeach -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:18:39 PM)

~FR~
 
Celeste pointed out some rather salient facts concerning the 109th Congrease.  Take a look at the 109th's record again, and you'll be much closer to understanding why I disapprove of All the folks in DC, and why I have consistantly voted AGAINST incumbants, regardless of party affiliations.
 
For those who are so disappointed that not everyone has jumped on the Obama bandwagon now that the election is over, I'd like to point out Another salient fact which Celeste did Not mention in her post concerning the record of the 109th.  Take a look at the names of the various men and women who were sitting in Congress for the 109th.  Both the Senate and the House, since Congress as a body is comprised of both.  You'll find several rather Significant names on that list.  Like, oh, the names of Every Single Person who was a candidate in the presidential race.  Including those of Obama and Biden.  Who are they again?  Oh yeah - The Winners - the president elect and vice president elect.  Two of the SAME people who gave us THE crappiest congrease in the history of this country.  What does that mean to me?  That means that the guy that so many voted for, who yall are so upset about some of us not embracing wholeheartedly even when we acknowledge that he IS the next president whether we voted for him or not - was part of the problem, voted in favor of the most blatantly rights stripping unconstitutional pieces of legislation ever to be presented (as it Was a Unanimous vote in the senate when looking at the records on the Patriot Act and PA2) was right there in the midst of 2 day work weeks, lack of needed debate on issues while concentrating on non-issue time wasting bs, 9 out of 12 budgets being late, etc.
 
I freely acknowledge that he was duly elected even though I did not vote for him.  He will be (barring tragedy) the next president of my country.  I will continue, as I have always Tried to do, to show the Office the respect I feel it deserves.  Whether I will extend that respect to the Holder of that office remains to be seen and will be determined (as it was during Bush's years) on whether or not he does what I consider an adequate job.  Bush didn't earn my respect in the least bit.  Whether or not Obama will manage to do so during his tenure of the Oval Office, I don't know - my precognitive abilities aren't the best in the world.  If the Congressional history during his time in the Senate is any indication of how he works - don't count on it happening.  I hope that bit of history was a fluke, and he does a good enough job to convince me in the future to overlook things like his part in the 109th.




NorthernGent -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:23:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

"OK, I didn't vote for him, but he's the President" But then, I'm confused



You most certainly are confused, Mystery.

Democracy is underpinned by the notion that everyone should have their voice heard, regardless of content.

Edited to add: 

A spread of ideas is healthy. In the event everyone is herded behind one idea, which I think is your sentiment, you'll have a real problem: something akin to totalitarianism. It's perfectly reasonable to have a reasonable disagreement, and it's perfectly reasonable to voice your disagreement.




Thunderbird56 -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:46:11 PM)

Very simply, there is no "American democracy" and thank goodness. There have been precious few true democracies throughout history and all of them have ended quickly and very violently. With 'one man - one vote' how could it go otherwise once human nature kicks in? Put even more simply, the definition of democracy is, "two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for lunch". 




BitaTruble -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:49:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hizgeorgiapeach

For those who are so disappointed that not everyone has jumped on the Obama bandwagon now that the election is over, I'd like to point out Another salient fact which Celeste did Not mention in her post concerning the record of the 109th.  Take a look at the names of the various men and women who were sitting in Congress for the 109th.  Both the Senate and the House, since Congress as a body is comprised of both.  You'll find several rather Significant names on that list.  Like, oh, the names of Every Single Person who was a candidate in the presidential race.  Including those of Obama and Biden. 

 
In all fairness, Obama was a class 3 junior dem Senator who had just won his seat in a republican majority that had already been in place for 4 years. The 109th Congress didn't just happen over night. It was a well-oiled, well-greased, corrupt machine with it's wheels churning vigorously when he got there and it was amazingly effective at shutting out any dem participation in actual government. There was consistent back-dooring in that Congress, so I'm hard pressed to hold it against him. Biden was also democrat but at least he knew the score.. was just completely ineffective against the pub powerhouse who, I'm sure, are really regretting the 'new rules of the game' they put into motion back then because it's coming back to bite them in the ass. They played the game too well and those who couldn't play it then play it quite well now.
 
quote:

Who are they again?  Oh yeah - The Winners - the president elect and vice president elect.  Two of the SAME people who gave us THE crappiest congrease in the history of this country.  What does that mean to me?  That means that the guy that so many voted for, who yall are so upset about some of us not embracing wholeheartedly even when we acknowledge that he IS the next president whether we voted for him or not - was part of the problem, voted in favor of the most blatantly rights stripping unconstitutional pieces of legislation ever to be presented (as it Was a Unanimous vote in the senate when looking at the records on the Patriot Act and PA2) was right there in the midst of 2 day work weeks, lack of needed debate on issues while concentrating on non-issue time wasting bs, 9 out of 12 budgets being late, etc.

 
I'm going to have to disagree with this. Patriot Act 1 was foul (and, here's a bit of trivia for those interested ... signed by Bush the day that Saddam was captured .. a Saturday no less.. anyone think maybe the country was a bit distracted that day?) Much of what was wrong with it was rectified in Patriot Act 2 which everyone pretty much knows was a compromise to get rid of the more odiferous #1 but it still stinks.
 
Obama's floor statement for Pat Act 2.

 




BitaTruble -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:52:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thunderbird56

Very simply, there is no "American democracy" and thank goodness.


Good point. We're a republic, not a democracy. Good catch.




NorthernGent -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 10:54:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thunderbird56

Put even more simply, the definition of democracy is, "two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for lunch". 



You'll notice I mentioned a reasonable disagreement.

Well, your above sentiment isn't reasonable.

In the event that three people vote, then you may have a point. In practice, though, millions of people vote and it's reasonable to assume that millions of people will not arrive at an unreasonable position such as devouring the lamb (unless, of course, you agree with the likes of Hobbes and Machiavelli in their assessment that man's natural state is war). Democracy has its limitations, of course, but feel free to post a credible alternative to majority rule.

Edited to add: I'm assuming your election is a matter of the most votes wins, i.e. majority rule.




TheHeretic -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 11:29:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

Edited to add: I'm assuming your election is a matter of the most votes wins, i.e. majority rule.



           Not quite, North.  There is an additional layer, the Electoral College, which throws a little weight to the less populous states to prevent the urban centers from asserting complete control.




NorthernGent -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 11:41:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

Edited to add: I'm assuming your election is a matter of the most votes wins, i.e. majority rule.



          Not quite, North.  There is an additional layer, the Electoral College, which throws a little weight to the less populous states to prevent the urban centers from asserting complete control.


We have a similar system, Rich. To all intents and purposes, though, the principle is majority rule. I wouldn't stand here and claim all is rosy in the Democracy garden, but what are the alternatives? Authoritarianism? Libertarianism? In my mind, both of these ignore human behaviour.




TheHeretic -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/7/2008 11:55:51 PM)

       We cannot all be sheep, North, but we can't all be wolves either.  None of the above.




NorthernGent -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 12:31:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

      We cannot all be sheep, North, but we can't all be wolves either.  None of the above.



In this country, we most certainly like to know where we stand, yet this doesn't compromise the need to have our voices heard. Perhaps the fact that other countries were willing and able to take on board the English concepts of the 'Rule of Law' and 'Tolerance', such as France and the United States, suggests there are other groups of humans that see things as we do.

In other words, we need a judge and jury, and we need a right of appeal, too; Authoritarianism and Libertarianism can't meet these needs.




awmslave -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 1:57:52 AM)

quote:

And if they don't like American democracy, what exactly do they propose? Because it sounds to me like they'd like a dictatorship, just that they can't agree on the dictator.

But then, I'm confused, so hopefully the smart people will explain it to me.

Thank you for doing so!


I guess it is just for provoking the response. World is not black and white (dictatorship vs democracy) but has many shades. Everybody knows what is going on and that USA is a case of highly manipulated semi-democracy. There is some truth in saying "people get what they deserve". The electorate is dumbed down to the extreme: there is a media circus, "debates" without almost any substance, billions of dollars change hands. How presidential elections take place is turning into almost absurd but people pretend like everything is normal. It is always useful to ask: "Who benefits"? The answer is obvious: two parties keep the monopoly  and share of power, the bankers and corporations will be happy, status quo will be preserved. Systems like this will change usually following serious economic crash. These times are approaching fast.




NorthernGent -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 2:18:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: awmslave

There is some truth in saying "people get what they deserve".



It is fundamentally accurate to suggest this: 'people get the government they deserve'.

Assuming the government has come down from mars, and they are inherently corrupt where others, i.e the people, aren't, then why aren't all these virtuous human beings stepping forward to move into government and lead the way to the golden path?

The answer is this: politicians are of the same stock as you and I. One of my biggest peeves is the ridiculous and self-defeating notion that 'it's the government's fault'.




SilverMark -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 4:35:00 AM)

Unfortunately we have, to some degree become a country of haters when it comes to politics and those who hate the most have the loudest voices, turn on talk radio sometime. I am amazed to read the blogs and hear the comments made and the lies that are told but, have become resigned to it. Maybe I am not so bright about the whys and wherefores of this hate and how it has become so ingrained in our society. No doubt, I dislike G. W .Bush but, after 9/11 I supported him and wanted him to be the right man at the right time. As it became the circus it did, my support turned to little more than dislike and disgust but, still always hoped for him and for the best for my country. I see those I disagree with here still trying hard (for the most part) to support our newly elected President and the others already looking for a rock to turn over to see him hidden as the anti-Christ under it, then of course use the rock to beat him and those who do support him over the head with the same rock.
Somewhere after Reagan, the reigns to our public opinion were handed over to those who only have a black and white view of the world. Perhaps it existed before and they simply didn't have the pulpit to express themselves and lord knows we have always had our nutbags but, it didn't seem so prevalent. I never hated either Bush, even voted for Reagan once, always voted for Dick Lugar and Bill Hudnut when I lived in Indianapolis (both Republicans and damn good men) never had to hate to be motivated to find who I thought was best for us but, something has changed within our society....The hate disgusts me....I support Obama, but didn't hate McCain, have spoken of McCain's being a good man and a great citizen, I hope those who hate will find it in themselves to someday stop but, it is far too deep to appeal to a better nature that simply may no longer exist.




thetammyjo -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 5:49:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And if they don't like American democracy, what exactly do they propose? Because it sounds to me like they'd like a dictatorship, just that they can't agree on the dictator.



Actually a study came out months ago that claims 30% at least of the American public has an authoritative personality meaning that they want to be told what to do, they want to be just followers. Is this an innate human trait for some people? Maybe, but I think if so that makes democracies almost unattainable. Being a citizen in a democracy, a real citizen, means doing the work and not just following.

I fear it may be innate and I think of what is often called the first democracy -- Athens in the 5th century bce. There they had some elected offices but many offices chosen by lot and folks were forced to serve in offices. Lots weren't a free for all though, they were based on income and location in part, it's complicated and I'm trying not to bore you all. They also required every male citizen to vote (those were the real means of the demes, thus the term democracy) and you would be arrested if you didn't participate. The first democracy then knew it had to force it's citizens to be active -- the result could be good or bad.

Sorry for the side journey into history folks.




Padriag -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 7:16:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


But then, I'm confused, so hopefully the smart people will explain it to me.

Thank you for doing so!

Its all very simple.  Its a HS popularity contest on a national scale, and just with any HS popularity contest, the losing side tend to be very sore losers who express it in very immature ways.  Blame it on the fact that America, by global standards, is still a very young country if you wish... or blame it on the fact that an essential flaw with democracy is that it allows virtually anyone to vote.




corysub -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/8/2008 7:27:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bluepanda

I absolutely loathe George Bush - consider him one of the most thoroughly despicable human beings ever to draw breath, and I have never considered him "my" president. I don't care how many other people voted for him; he is not morally, ethically, or intellectually fit to hold any public office higher than notary public, and frankly I'm not even too sure about that. I wouldn't give that slimy little reptile the benefit of the doubt  on anything, regardless of that impressive seal on the front of his podium.

So it doesn't surprise or anger me in any way if there are others who now feel the same way about Obama. Doesn't matter. It's not a repudiation of democracy in any way, as far as I'm concerned. Just as Bush did what he did for the last 8 years, whether I  approved or not, Obama will now do whatever he's  going to do for the next 4, or 8, regardless of what the people who dislike him think of the matter. C'est la vie. In 4 years, they'll get another chance to vote against him like I voted twice against Bush, and if they can persuade enough of their friends and neighbors to vote the same way, they'll get their wish. But until and unless they are able to do that, I really don't give a flying fuck what any of them think of Obama, any more than any of them gave a rat's ass what I thought of Bush. I had to live with 8 years of Bush, now they've got to live with 4 (or 8) years of Obama. Fuck 'em. 


So as I understand your words...you would not vote for Bush if he was allowed to run for a third term?

One other question, why do you hold Notary Public in such low esteem.  The provide a valuable service at reasonable cost.





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125