meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KAZVorpal quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver Then why do you insist on promoting free markets as though free markets are the natural state of the world. Free markets is an unnatural state. Markets have never been free and always been up for negotiation, even in the USA. Because free markets are the most efficient, most equitable, and most benign mode of economic interaction extant. All other modes are destructive to both people and the planet.    And I suppose that's why free markets were rejected in the 19th century. Elections were rejected in the 2nd century, too. You need a better retort than a laughable appeal to popularity. In fact, economic freedom has proven itself the most effective form, whether it was rejected by the greedy, power-grubbing socialists or not. Where it has been rejected, and to the extent it has, economies have weakened and stagnated. That is why China is easing into capitalism, now. It is why Sweden was such a pathetic economic shambles in the early nineties. It is why the US is struggling economically, after 8 years of a very interventionist, effectively socialist Bush administration expanding regulations and spending. You are showing your ignorance in the growth of western capitalism. Western capitalism grew because it controled the markets, not because it competed freely. It was the Empires that provided the west with the wealth and Manifest Destiny was the US equivalent of European empire building. You know, stealing land and resources and controling the markets. Elections were suppressed by the Christian church in favour of the divine right of kings, the church giving the kings the divine right of course, from where it gained its power. North Germanic (Scandinavia, Britain, N Germany etc.) culture was always democratic in nature in the sense kings were elected. As Christianity lost its potency, the chance was North European democracy was going to reassert itself. Also, socialism was born as a reaction to capitalist greed and exploitation and as you will noice, captialism is succeeding in Chine because its people aren't free, in the same way westerners weren't free in during the growth of western capitalism. People who advocate free markets as beneficial would probably not survive in the them because it is clear they don't understand them and why they were rejected in the first place because they are under an illusion there was a golden age of free markets in the first place.
< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/22/2008 3:00:33 AM >
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|