Naga
Posts: 147
Joined: 10/11/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou You have an error there. Saddam was no threat to the US ever. Especially, after the first war. Anyway, if you come back and argue he was a threat, LOL, well my friend, there are about a 100 worse "threats" out there, and we will be going to war forever. Also, since when is a "general threat" a justification for war. Really, you need to rethink that almost universal pass to war, you are handing out there a bit. And for the record more US citizens have died now fighting "the war on terror" in Iraq, than the terrorists killed on 9-11. Unless you are assuming all those deaths in Iraq are caused by terrorist, which would be crazy, as they aren't terrorists when they are defending their own country in their own country. Anyway, it's really weird that you'd say that, you seem sane in other threads. That was not known, there were several branches of intelligence communities from different countries that said he was a threat. Never mind that he never complied with his own surrender terms and did not give up nuclear research and materials to international agencies as he had agreed to do. He openly bragged that he had continued to develop such threats. Finally, the war never ended, it has been ongoing since Bush Senior. Clinton was just too lazy to finish the job, therefore it needed to be finished by someone actually willing to be responsible.
|