LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
I dont understand the problem? My impression was, that if you cant pay you dont get anything and this was The American Way (TM). If the paraplegic had no funds to cover his treatment either independently or by way of insurance, or ran short of funds either independently or because of some insurance company decision, then he must be discharged, and having no funds then skid row is obviously where he will live in future, even if he didnt live there previously. And being a paraplegic, its hardly likely he'll ever work to generate payment in the future either - and clearly, since he is unable to leave the ambulance of his own accord, he would have to be carried out and since he cannot stand, be laid on the ground. I really find it hard to understand why anyone should be shocked or surprised - this is how its meant to work I thought? The only difference between this case and the millions who suffer and die in abject pain at home for want of funds is that this case is more in the public eye. Now, let's consider the people who did this. Were they indeed heartless scum as might seem to be the case? Or is there an argument here that the whole thing was done very deliberately with the aim of securing him some sort of compensation settlement by way of the outrage it would cause? I find it very difficult to believe that hospital and ambulance staff are doing what they do for money - perhaps this was the only way possible for this poor soul to get what was required for his future treatment? But either way its a sad indictment of the most wealthy country on the planet, and of California - an economy greater than that of the UK, that this guy is dumped heartlessly or dumped with a purpose. And I wonder what those will say who maintain that a national health service is a bad thing? Becoming paralysed can happen to any one of them, every time they get in the car or cross the street - at which point they too would find that despite their current good rating when it comes to insurance et al, they would sooner or later be discharged when the costs mounted, and likely in similar circumstances. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|