LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 Liberty, because order is antithetical to peace. Order, being an external imposition, is the beginning of violence. "Orderly" societies have rarely been able to peacefully coexist with anybody. The best means of order/organization to maximize liberty is one which endows the individual with supreme political power, and where his interest in sustaining a body politic is grounded in his own individual self-interest (especially economically through property and business ownership). Yet unconfined liberty must sooner or later result in violence and the imposition of order by the stronger over the weaker; an order deriving right from might rather than might from right? But agreed with the endowment of supreme political power to the person and referring back to HGP's post, the requirement for personal responsibility should personal liberty be desired. Yet even here, the stronger will always impose an order which seeks the aims of the stronger over the weaker. In the end, we need a guarantor for our personal liberty which surpasses the power of others to reduce it. The weak especially need this guarantor, and the strong need to fear it in order for them not to impinge upon or define the liberty of the weak. Such is the rightful role of God, King, Law - sources of order which are not defined by the changing roles and powers of the actors within a society, and not reliant on their favour. That such have been lost, abandoned or undermined has left us with Government as the arbiter of liberty and order - Government which is lacking in the requisite credentials since it is strongly defined by the actors and reliant on them. It is a difficult balance which only performs well if all participants fulfil their roles properly - which of course means personal responsibility, or put another way, self repression to produce order which then guarantees liberty..... E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|