Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cjan quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth Well, it's good to see that everyone is now convinced that the President Bush plan for bailing out the financial institutions was the correct path and wants to follow it to the letter, including verifying the documentation. (VERY REPUBLICAN) If only the Democratic Congress followed it and demanded the details for all the tax money sent to those guys. Your tax money BTW - but again - supporting the Bush/Obama stimulus packages seems to justify anything, including having the bail out not paid back. Took a while, but its good to see you all come around to seeing how smart the ex President was, as President Obama has. Me, I'm a pragmatist, and if the program calls for these financial institutions to recapture their mortgage investment I would think the people responsible for oversight, namely Congress, wouldn't suggest ways to circumvent that plan. Then again, considering the Congresswoman in question has never worked in the public sector she thinks and expects the source of tax payer money is never ending and will always be there. Speaking of Italy - I can't wait! Thanks for all the regards. As a retired citizen I expect my newly adopted government to work to keep me in the manner I've become accustomed. You're all welcome to visit! It's a really big castle. In the words of the late Reagan one of your favs, merc, "there you go again". You blow smoke like it's good for us, usually second-hand smoke. It's not even worthy of a response. Bon voyage. It's quite ironic ( and delicious ) that you are headed to a country where a significant part of the population has voted for communist and socialist parties over the years. I'm sure that you will be happy there behind your moat. C, Quoting President Reagan? Are you converting? Seems to be the path of the current administration too. Even the; "at least he hasn't sent troops to occupy a country" is going to be short lived according to this story. quote:
Admiral Michael Mullen, the most senior American military officer, said the U.S. will probably deploy close to 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan to shore up deteriorating security there. Short term? Nope: quote:
Mullen said the new resources are needed to buy time for a broad, long-term buildup of Afghan security forces that will allow the U.S. to “put an Afghan face” on the effort and dispel perceptions of a foreign occupation. Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=afll.9YZiyUY&refer=worldwide Change? Nope! It's best that you don't respond - what the hell can you say? Same stimulus package, same people getting tax money to be bailed out. Same bonuses being paid. Same 'shock' and 'appall' by the President when bonuses are paid with the tax money. Same US troop deployment to intervene in the affairs of a foreign sovereign nation. All in a couple of weeks. Stay tuned for next week's big tax cut compromise for fellow Republican votes in the Senate. Hell, I don't think Senator McCain would have 'accomplished' all this in so short a time. Yeah, it's much better to take your tactic and not address any of that. Regarding Italy's political farce; even the locals joke about it. Their ambition matches mine - keep the government out of the process of business. However, unlike their US counterparts, when they don't like what's going on - they have not problem kicking out the entire batch and starting again from scratch. I think they've done it over 100 times since WWII. Better that attitude than that of the sheep we have voting here - reelecting the same corrupt and self aggrandizing people who's only concern is the next bag drop from their PAC paymasters. Yes - even a democratically elected 'communist' government is preferred to that. But you should continue to rationalize. It's obvious you have no other possible answer. Why not address the situation concerning this 'Produce the note' issue? It's your money which paid the failure bail out, which paid the bonuses, which this 13 term Congress person voted for by 'selling' the idea to the public that it would be an 'investment' paid back when the loans were collected. Now she's suggesting ways to cheat that process. Ways that will ultimately fail, and only add more expense to the process insuring that the repayment will be encumbered. How noble? Do you admire her, or see her as the hypocrite as I do?
|