RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


subtex -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 9:56:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama
As a side point, though, I also agree that there is something dubious about all the screaming, pissing and moaning that people do about financial and professional domination. I think ultimately that the bitterness is caused by the fact that our society has a very, very limited range of taste when it comes to attractiveness, sexiness or beauty. Many men aren't just bitter that there are women out there who are financial dommes in general--they are bitter because the women they are attracted to, and most likely to contact, tend to be financially motivated.



You're probably right about the complaining subs going for a certain look.  Just to be clear though I want to point out that not all financial dominants fit in that limited range of taste defining beauty. 

Bill




rulemylife -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:12:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo

I think we need to realize that these ideas of the "bitch princess" I'm going to call her is promoted in a lot of pornography both visual and written. Obviously if a young man finds such images and information during his formative sexual years we should not be surprised by his thinking this is what a female dominant is like.

The only way to really break that cycle is to stop buying that type of pornography.

I think that is unlikely to happen and thus the complaints and continued attention to these types of services and personalities will continue.



Or maybe, do you think it is possible that most men are not mindless drones who cannot separate fantasy from reality?

I like to watch action movies on occasion.

That does not mean I accept as reality I can fall from a 20-story building, survive, brush myself off, and go on to arrest the bad guys.




subtex -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:28:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Or maybe, do you think it is possible that most men are not mindless drones who cannot separate fantasy from reality?


So which is this again?

Seriously though when I was 20 something and first out on my own I didn't know Dominants and submissives could interact like real people.  I thought it was all protocol.  A lot of the stuff I was reading was saying that.  I didn't know any Dominants to tell me otherwise.  Mind you this was before the internet but after stone tablets.  This actually created some distress.  I wanted to belong to a woman but I didn't want the full fantasy I was reading about.  In this fantasy world you would have to give yourself to someone you don't really know and there didn't really seem to be a method of getting to know a dominant without becoming their slave first.  The protocol didn't' seem to allow for light conversation.  I bought some adult personal ad magazines but couldn't decide to answer any because of this conflict.  So I went back and forth between deciding vanilla was best for me and deciding I wanted to be owned.

Edited because I hit okay before typing anything :)

Bill




ShaktiSama -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:28:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

You must be a disciple of Nancy Reagan.


*chuckles*  Nope, I'm an advocate of personal responsibility and personal choice.  Check my signature line; I'm philosophically I'm influenced by Heinlein and Robert Anton Wilson, not by the Reagan/Bush/Bush regime.  The person here who actually sounds like a paternalistic authoritarian Republican who wants to start a War on Drugs is you, buckaroo.

Personally, I think virtually any drug you can name should be legal and available for adults to purchase and consume by choice.  I'd rather see people buy heroin the way they buy booze, cigarettes, fast food, porn, and countless other legal products that destroy your body and rot your brain by your own free will.  And I feel the same way about "bad" sex that goes on between consenting adults--namely, that there is no such thing.

See, "choice" is not defined solely by the times when people do what YOU think is right, or healthy, or responsible, or fun.  Choice is only meaningful when people can freely do what you would not.  In this case, that sometimes means going to the lingerie store with an aching hard-on and buying a stupidly expensive piece of flimsy silk for some spoiled bitch to drape over her pinkbits, sending it to her by mail because you are not worthy to lay it at her feet in person, and wanking away for weeks over the thought of her opening the package, smiling wolfishly at what a obedient foolish little worm you are, and tossing the present in her drawer.

If that's not your kink--great.  But your hysterical need to condemn is actually a sign of an unexamined problem--not in the dollar-dommes and their submissives, but in you.  THEY are mutually happy, YOU are freaking out.  Doesn't that tell you something?  'Cause it should.




MissEnchanted -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:38:32 AM)

quote:

THEY are mutually happy, YOU are freaking out. Doesn't that tell you something? 'Cause it should.


Bingo again!

[:D][:D][:D]




AAkasha -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:53:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo

I think we need to realize that these ideas of the "bitch princess" I'm going to call her is promoted in a lot of pornography both visual and written. Obviously if a young man finds such images and information during his formative sexual years we should not be surprised by his thinking this is what a female dominant is like.

The only way to really break that cycle is to stop buying that type of pornography.

I think that is unlikely to happen and thus the complaints and continued attention to these types of services and personalities will continue.



Or maybe, do you think it is possible that most men are not mindless drones who cannot separate fantasy from reality?

I like to watch action movies on occasion.

That does not mean I accept as reality I can fall from a 20-story building, survive, brush myself off, and go on to arrest the bad guys.



It doesn't mean ALL men are influenced by this kind of thing, but some certainly are.  While there are many men that are kinky just because, or into panties just because, or into high heels and sucking feet "just because," there are many who had some impactful experiences in their youth that they eroticized and received an "imprint" from, and they carried that fantasy with them to adulthood.  In some of the men I have talked to who have this "bitch goddess, unobtainable cruel persona" fantasy, they clearly had some experiences in their past where a very beautiful (to them at the time) girl was unobtainable and treated him like crap but he eroticized it as a coping mechanism.   As a result, he enjoys reliving that fantasy.

In a lot of ways it's not so different from cuckolding, where a man eroticizes that he is "unworthy" and cannot penetrate or have sex with his "Goddess" yet she can fuck others all she wants, and he enjoys this feeling of humiliation in that context.  Buying gifts for a "cruel heartless bitch" who will use your gifts but spend her time and attention on other men is a form of financial humiliation, really.   

Akasha




thetammyjo -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 11:20:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo

I think we need to realize that these ideas of the "bitch princess" I'm going to call her is promoted in a lot of pornography both visual and written. Obviously if a young man finds such images and information during his formative sexual years we should not be surprised by his thinking this is what a female dominant is like.

The only way to really break that cycle is to stop buying that type of pornography.

I think that is unlikely to happen and thus the complaints and continued attention to these types of services and personalities will continue.



Or maybe, do you think it is possible that most men are not mindless drones who cannot separate fantasy from reality?

I like to watch action movies on occasion.

That does not mean I accept as reality I can fall from a 20-story building, survive, brush myself off, and go on to arrest the bad guys.



I didn't say they were mindless.

But the fact remains that happens to you during your formative years has a huge impact on what you find attractive and a turn on.

Yes, you can chose a different way to try and get turned on but if you can't see alternatives around you where can you look?

That's true for men and women.

I wasn't making a sexist comment, sorry you interpreted it like that, I was making a comment on the fact that no one is completely in charge of what turns them on. Choice is never 100% free.




DavanKael -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 11:37:43 AM)

I haven't the tiniest problem with someone paying (tribute or otherwise) for the skull-f*ck (Or any other kind of f*ck) of their choosing as long as all parties involved are consenting. 
  Davan




MistressDolly -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 1:04:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama


quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I wonder how much success they're actually having. It's hard for me to believe that they're having much at all.


Actually, if you read Akasha's post carefully, you might see some evidence to the contrary. She is not a financial domme, but she has been able to observe over a long period of time that a dominant woman is more likely to receive gifts from admirers if she states her desire for a gift forcefully, and even rudely. More men seem to get something "special" out of fulfilling a rude and selfish demand, than they do from fulfilling a politely phrased request.

The point is that being used financially is humiliating. It is demeaning and dehumanizing. And some men love that feeling--humiliated, dehumanized--and not only love it, but crave it. But they don't want to be swindled and used by just anybody--they want it from an attractive woman.

Anyone who thinks this fetish is somehow rare or strange has not been looking closely enough at the marriages and relationships of celebrities and the very rich. There are plenty of "trophy wives" who are humiliating, emasculating, cuckolding, usurious bitches--and their husbands continue to "put up" with their antic year after year. Ever ask yourself why?

It exists among celebrities too. Judging by the testimony of her former partners, Anna Nicole Smith was a dominant woman. She spent a lot of energy teasing and humiliating her partners, and she was very much into being worshipped. *shrug* I don't particularly care one way or the other, but I've noticed that women like Anna seem to incur a lot of this same hostility and disbelief in the vanilla world that garden variety financial dommes do here.

People just can't believe that any man could be that kinky, or be in his right mind and enjoy being used. They think the woman should feel guilty for accepting the power that he freely offers. But the fact is, power is power, and pleasure is pleasure, and consent is consent. Lots of vanilla and dominant men can't believe that a woman who says she wants to tie guys up, make them dress as women or fuck them in the ass is having any real success either. But the truth is that if she had the energy, a woman could keep her strap-on buried in an endless string of men, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and NEVER run out of guys who want and need to be humiliated and penetrated. Especially if she let them come back for seconds.


This entire post really hits the bulls-eye. There are some who will take issue with things being stated so rawly, but I appreciate it, and know it to be true. Despite the romantic gibberish which seems to indicate otherwise, many males do actually find fulfillment in truly being used by a Woman who knows what she wants and won't apologize for it. It may not work for some, but like it or not, it does work very well for others. Exploiting men is a psychological art—it's not just about an internet twenty-something with pursed lips and an extended middle finger demanding cash anonymously. I think a lot of people hostile to the idea of financial slavery and spoildom characterize that image in their mind a lot. Clever Women have built fortunes on the backs of male victims who knew what the score was and obviously enjoyed it every step of the way.




LaTigresse -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 1:15:46 PM)

Okay, where do I sign up for lessons. My coffers are bare here.




MistressDolly -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 1:49:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Okay, where do I sign up for lessons. My coffers are bare here.


www.mistre.....lol.

;-D




LaTigresse -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 2:08:32 PM)

Now that brought a smile to my face!




4u2spoil -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 4:36:17 PM)

Dead on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama


quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I wonder how much success they're actually having. It's hard for me to believe that they're having much at all.


Actually, if you read Akasha's post carefully, you might see some evidence to the contrary. She is not a financial domme, but she has been able to observe over a long period of time that a dominant woman is more likely to receive gifts from admirers if she states her desire for a gift forcefully, and even rudely. More men seem to get something "special" out of fulfilling a rude and selfish demand, than they do from fulfilling a politely phrased request.

The point is that being used financially is humiliating. It is demeaning and dehumanizing. And some men love that feeling--humiliated, dehumanized--and not only love it, but crave it. But they don't want to be swindled and used by just anybody--they want it from an attractive woman.

Anyone who thinks this fetish is somehow rare or strange has not been looking closely enough at the marriages and relationships of celebrities and the very rich. There are plenty of "trophy wives" who are humiliating, emasculating, cuckolding, usurious bitches--and their husbands continue to "put up" with their antic year after year. Ever ask yourself why?

It exists among celebrities too. Judging by the testimony of her former partners, Anna Nicole Smith was a dominant woman. She spent a lot of energy teasing and humiliating her partners, and she was very much into being worshipped. *shrug* I don't particularly care one way or the other, but I've noticed that women like Anna seem to incur a lot of this same hostility and disbelief in the vanilla world that garden variety financial dommes do here.

People just can't believe that any man could be that kinky, or be in his right mind and enjoy being used. They think the woman should feel guilty for accepting the power that he freely offers. But the fact is, power is power, and pleasure is pleasure, and consent is consent. Lots of vanilla and dominant men can't believe that a woman who says she wants to tie guys up, make them dress as women or fuck them in the ass is having any real success either. But the truth is that if she had the energy, a woman could keep her strap-on buried in an endless string of men, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and NEVER run out of guys who want and need to be humiliated and penetrated. Especially if she let them come back for seconds.

Takes all kinds to make a world. [;)]







hardbodysub -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 7:54:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama


quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I wonder how much success they're actually having. It's hard for me to believe that they're having much at all.


Actually, if you read Akasha's post carefully, you might see some evidence to the contrary. She is not a financial domme, but she has been able to observe over a long period of time that a dominant woman is more likely to receive gifts from admirers if she states her desire for a gift forcefully, and even rudely. More men seem to get something "special" out of fulfilling a rude and selfish demand, than they do from fulfilling a politely phrased request.

The point is that being used financially is humiliating. It is demeaning and dehumanizing. And some men love that feeling--humiliated, dehumanized--and not only love it, but crave it. But they don't want to be swindled and used by just anybody--they want it from an attractive woman.

Anyone who thinks this fetish is somehow rare or strange has not been looking closely enough at the marriages and relationships of celebrities and the very rich. There are plenty of "trophy wives" who are humiliating, emasculating, cuckolding, usurious bitches--and their husbands continue to "put up" with their antic year after year. Ever ask yourself why?

It exists among celebrities too. Judging by the testimony of her former partners, Anna Nicole Smith was a dominant woman. She spent a lot of energy teasing and humiliating her partners, and she was very much into being worshipped. *shrug* I don't particularly care one way or the other, but I've noticed that women like Anna seem to incur a lot of this same hostility and disbelief in the vanilla world that garden variety financial dommes do here.

People just can't believe that any man could be that kinky, or be in his right mind and enjoy being used. They think the woman should feel guilty for accepting the power that he freely offers. But the fact is, power is power, and pleasure is pleasure, and consent is consent. Lots of vanilla and dominant men can't believe that a woman who says she wants to tie guys up, make them dress as women or fuck them in the ass is having any real success either. But the truth is that if she had the energy, a woman could keep her strap-on buried in an endless string of men, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and NEVER run out of guys who want and need to be humiliated and penetrated. Especially if she let them come back for seconds.

Takes all kinds to make a world. [;)]



I think most of the post above is perfectly obvious. What I find hard to believe is that there are many men willing to send a lot of money and expensive gifts to someone they've never met, just because they see a profile that demands it of them. Personal power, humiliation fetish, that's all easy to understand when you're talking about a real person in front of you. It's the probably phony online financial dommes whose success that I doubt.




Lockit -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 9:11:50 PM)

Gee... I have nothing in my profile that would suggest I want anything more than a female led relationship and I get mail all the time from men who wish to send gifts and such.  Could they be saying what they think I want to hear as a dominant or simply who I am?  Well, not if they read the profile.  But the fact remains.. if a grown adult wants to be used or to give... who is another submissive to say he is being used wrongly or shouldn't do what he does or judge his kink or act as if he is a rarity and THEN... blame a dominant for being into it as well?

There will be wrongs... but who are we to state that something is wrong when people are willingly walking in to a situation and seek it and comparing that to women taking advantage of men?  I dare say that with all the web sites out there for this type of kink or whatever you want to call it... are there because men want to be and there are many sites because so many want to be there.

There will be all types... some people simply need to get over some things and move on.  Your point that you don't like it... is proven... But there are those that do like it and don't feel as you do.  Big deal.





MistressDolly -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:09:16 PM)

Honestly, I've gotten into intense cyber exchanges with financial masochists using letters, cams, phone calls and text messages. What ever fee I demanded, I got. I was a stranger they never met, but that did not keep them from benefiting me greatly both monetarily and from an amusement factor. ;)




MistressDolly -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:12:08 PM)

[sm=applause.gif]




hardbodysub -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:38:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Gee... I have nothing in my profile that would suggest I want anything more than a female led relationship and I get mail all the time from men who wish to send gifts and such.  Could they be saying what they think I want to hear as a dominant or simply who I am?  Well, not if they read the profile.  But the fact remains.. if a grown adult wants to be used or to give... who is another submissive to say he is being used wrongly or shouldn't do what he does or judge his kink or act as if he is a rarity and THEN... blame a dominant for being into it as well?

There will be wrongs... but who are we to state that something is wrong when people are willingly walking in to a situation and seek it and comparing that to women taking advantage of men?  I dare say that with all the web sites out there for this type of kink or whatever you want to call it... are there because men want to be and there are many sites because so many want to be there.

There will be all types... some people simply need to get over some things and move on.  Your point that you don't like it... is proven... But there are those that do like it and don't feel as you do.  Big deal.





If you're referring to me when you say "some people simply need to get over some things and move on", well you're barking up the wrong tree. Or maybe "preaching to the choir" is a more apt phrase. I don't believe I said anything to indicate that I give a damn whether anybody else enjoys something I don't like or not. I was just questioning whether it's as popular as some seem to think.

It seems to me that we're talking about apples and oranges here. A guy offering you money or gifts is a very different situation from the profiles that are set up purely for financial domination. For one thing, there is fair amount of evidence to indicate that you are for real.




hardbodysub -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:42:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressDolly

Honestly, I've gotten into intense cyber exchanges with financial masochists using letters, cams, phone calls and text messages. What ever fee I demanded, I got. I was a stranger they never met, but that did not keep them from benefiting me greatly both monetarily and from an amusement factor. ;)


I don't doubt that for a second, Mistress Dolly. But, as I also said to Lockit, there is a lot more to you than a bare bones profile set up purely for financial domination.




Lockit -> RE: Buy me gifts. Spoil me. You don't deserve me! (2/2/2009 10:43:31 PM)

Hardbody, I am talking to a few who seem to have a problem with all of this and not in just this thread.  It is more an attitude on both sides I think.  Kind of getting tired of hearing about it all.  You and I don't always see things the same way... but we have been on the same side of a topic a few times.  lol




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0390625