newflowers
Posts: 292
Joined: 5/23/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
So, what are the reasons? are they justified?... do we deserve it from time to time. do others deserved it? while we all have our perspectives, opinions, and beliefs, we do participate, in varying degrees, in an alternative lifestyle that, on the surface at least, touts acceptance and tolerance of others as it is what we want for ourselves. IF a person says that he/she agrees with the "community" espoused belief in acceptance and then proceeds to flame others of different likes/dislikes, kink, desires, wants, etc. then that person talks the talks and we all know what talk is and how much it costs. i choose not to participate in organized religion because i find that, for the most part, adherents to "the faith" are distinctly unaccepting and intolerent of others who do not believe the same way AND because, in my observation and experience, they may sing praises on sunday and flip you off on monday. i call this hypocrisy; i choose not to participate. if someone chooses to live that way, that is their choice, but i can make the choice not to join them. we all choose what we believe and how we act and react. though my opinion, beliefs, likes/dislikes, needs/desires, kink may be different than anothers, it does not lessen the value another places on thier own likes/ dislikes, etc. it is DIFFERENT - that does not make it WRONG. i may never be able to enter into a intimate relationship with that person, but there is no reason why we cannot have civilized discussion. we can disagree and sometimes, given the disparity of our opinions, we may have to agree to disagree, but that does not mean that we cannot each state our opinion. i teach in the inner-city. there, most every student can name the fighters for freedom and civil rights of both black and latino ethnicities. it is also a place that has a tremendous anti-homosexual sentiment. while many - adults and children - can understand that bigotry and prejudice because of skin color or religion is wrong and immoral, they do not have a problem with anti-gay sentiment or outright hatred. largely this stems from a pervasive "christian" belief, but they do not see it is wrong; they do not see it is the same bigotry and prejudice. i am baffled by this. sometimes, we do write responses designed to bring another off their high horse, and, sometimes, responses are written that show a distinct lack of acceptance of others. i do believe that there can be a difference between the two. however, when any of us convey intolerence or a lack of acceptance - the same tolerance and acceptance that we expect for ourselves, that we espouse as part of "the lifestyle" then we talk the talk but we do not walk the walk. it is hypocrisy. we can dress it up in pretty ribbons and "justify" it with any number of reasons, that does not change what it really is. we all make choices on a daily basis. here, we choose what we read, what we responses we type; we can also choose to ignore something and not make a response. we CHOOSE our attitude and our responses. we can jusitify that which we know to be unaccepting and intolerence, but the justification does not change how we have reacted to another. the justification does not make it the right thing to do. newflowers
< Message edited by newflowers -- 1/14/2006 5:49:36 PM >
|