Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/5/2009 10:46:40 PM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

quote:

Men do not respect women in those countries, they fear them. Is my belief.


I think you need to widen your horizons and learn a little bit more about such cultures. I think you may be a little misinformed by stereotypes.





I think you need to widen yours. You do not know where I have traveled. I have contact with those cultures. I do not receive my judgments from television. I traveled in many parts of the world with my parents from age of 16 until now.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/5/2009 10:57:17 PM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa

" It is done so that she will be respected instead of looked at as a sexual object."

The women do not make the decision to dress this way. Men make the laws. My belief is these men are afraid of the sexual power of the women. The men are weak and fear a woman's sexual power. Men make laws to cover women so the men can remove power from women.


In the Qur'an, both men and women are instructed to show modesty in the way they dress.  Neither men nor women may wear clothing that is form fitting, sheer, or revealing.  The clothing isn't based on fear of a woman's power.  It is an obligation given to Muslim women by God.  By dressing so that only their hands (and sometimes faces) show, Muslim women are obeying the will of God.  However, not all Muslim women choose to dress this way.
 
There are many web sites that provide English translations of the Qur'an (Koran).  I don't know of any that have it translated into Polish or Russian, but I'm sure you could find one or use Google to translate it for you.  The tradition about covering is stated in Chapter 24, verses 30-31 and Chapter 33, verse 59. 


Most women do not wear the covering because of the will of God or because Qur'an tells them so. Most wear because men make them. In Afghanistan when Taliban was overthrown many women choose not to wear the coverings any longer. Did God change? NO! Did the Qur'an change? NO! The men in power changed.

Why do not most Muslim women in western countries wear these coverings ? Same God, same Qur'an. Different men in power is why.

< Message edited by Nikitaa -- 2/5/2009 11:01:59 PM >

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/5/2009 11:56:44 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa


quote:

ORIGINAL: antipode
I mean, is a guy with a harem kinky?



(snipped)

I wish I could have sub harem. One sub for cleaning, one for errands, on for back rubs, One for sex, One for making ice, you get idea.
America should change laws of marriage. There is enough of Nikita for many men.


Who says you can't have the harem you want? You don't have to marry them.

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 12:19:13 AM   
YoursMistress


Posts: 894
Joined: 12/17/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa

I wish I could have sub harem. One sub for cleaning, one for errands, on for back rubs, One for sex, One for making ice, you get idea.
America should change laws of marriage. There is enough of Nikita for many men.


I'll make the ice. 

yours


_____________________________

May your service of love a beautiful thing; want nothing else, fear nothing else and let love be free to become what love truly is. -- Hadewijch of Antwerp

As a rule, I don't like to make general statements.

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 12:25:18 AM   
MsDDom


Posts: 368
Joined: 1/1/2009
From: GA
Status: offline
quote:

If a man desires this only is this kink? If you say yes then if a woman desires only domination from a man is this kink or is this "normal" lifestyle.

edit.....more

If someone decides all decisions in a relationship are they considered dominant? I wonder if all men in the strict Arab countries are considered dominant. They want dominance but no kink.


i think it is both...why? b/c to vanilla a man wanting a dominant woman is seen a kinky; the flip is since "lifers" dont see a kink associated to it, it can be considers "normal" (vanilla) life.

i made a majority of the decisions back in my vanilla marriage, but i was considered neither dominant or submissive...it was just a way of living. if someone analyzed it, i would have been "dominant".

i am/have been dealing w/ two men from egypt and they are submissive to the core, and one had told his wife to which she called him abnormal. i have conversed w/ other arab men who r very submissive...sissy even. i venture to say that the country of origin doesnt even matter anymore...it is what is innately within the human.



_____________________________

...:: MsDDom ::...

... live Life honestly ...

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 12:36:11 AM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsDDom

quote:

If a man desires this only is this kink? If you say yes then if a woman desires only domination from a man is this kink or is this "normal" lifestyle.

edit.....more

If someone decides all decisions in a relationship are they considered dominant? I wonder if all men in the strict Arab countries are considered dominant. They want dominance but no kink.


i think it is both...why? b/c to vanilla a man wanting a dominant woman is seen a kinky; the flip is since "lifers" dont see a kink associated to it, it can be considers "normal" (vanilla) life.

i made a majority of the decisions back in my vanilla marriage, but i was considered neither dominant or submissive...it was just a way of living. if someone analyzed it, i would have been "dominant".

i am/have been dealing w/ two men from egypt and they are submissive to the core, and one had told his wife to which she called him abnormal. i have conversed w/ other arab men who r very submissive...sissy even. i venture to say that the country of origin doesnt even matter anymore...it is what is innately within the human.



I believe what you write is true. In my traveling I have seen many submissive men from other cultures. I was only 17 when I visited Syria with my father and not aware of kink play as I am now but I remember some things and how submissive many men where.

(in reply to MsDDom)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 1:38:01 AM   
FullfigRIMAAM1


Posts: 1160
Joined: 11/20/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan
Yes, what you've described is a D/s relationship.  The "kink" is in the issue of control.  There are some people who do not need or want bondage, humiliation, pain, or any of the other things one commonly thinks of as part of a BDSM relationship.  The fulfillment for the sub is in service -- doing things like cleaning the house, cooking meals, or bringing coffee to the dominant.  On the other side, the dominant person feels fulfilled by having a submissive companion who serves out of feelings of love and devotion.
 
I'm one of those dominant people.  As sadistic as I am (and I am Evil with a capital E), I could live happily without ever inflicting pain again if I had a quality D/s relationship with a compatible slave girl.
Ditto!     Except for the very sadistic part, as I don't think I am, except one gentleman politely disagreed once about that.    M

_____________________________

The place to improve the world is first in one's own heart and head and hands.-Robert M. Persig

Love is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problem of human existence Erich Fromm

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 3:46:03 AM   
JustDarkness


Posts: 1461
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I believe what you write is true. In my traveling I have seen many submissive men from other cultures. I was only 17 when I visited Syria with my father and not aware of kink play as I am now but I remember some things and how submissive many men where.


memories from the past are often differently then the situation as it really was. You project your present as Domme..on that past. (well..migth be a reason that the males looked submissive there)

(in reply to FullfigRIMAAM1)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 8:08:49 AM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
I would say that it's a kink if he finds it erotic or sexually exciting, which is a pretty sure bet, or he probably wouldn't be interested in it. If it doesn't have an erotic or sexual nature, then it's simply a preference for one person to be head-of-household; not a kink, just a system for decision-making.

All of the definitions I found when I looked up "kink" and "kinky" (excluding the other meaning which has nothing at all to do with BDSM - curly, twisted), linked the word closely with sex. Examples below:

"relating to, having, or appealing to unconventional tastes especially in sex ; also : sexually deviant"
"Showing or appealing to bizarre or deviant tastes, especially of a sexual or erotic nature"
"having or showing unusual ways of getting sexual excitement"

So, I think the attachment to sexual excitement is what makes an unusual preference a kink.


(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 8:28:41 AM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa
Most women do not wear the covering because of the will of God or because Qur'an tells them so. Most wear because men make them. In Afghanistan when Taliban was overthrown many women choose not to wear the coverings any longer. Did God change? NO! Did the Qur'an change? NO! The men in power changed.

Why do not most Muslim women in western countries wear these coverings ? Same God, same Qur'an. Different men in power is why.


It's true that the Taliban turned covering into a form of oppression.  However, I don't know if it's true that "most" Muslim women only cover because men make them.  In my city, we have a large Muslim community.  The university I attend has many young Muslim women in the school and most of them cover.  I have seen Muslim women working at child care centers, grocery stores, even Wal-Mart and all of them have been covered.  When I lived in Los Angeles, my experience was similar.  I'm not sure it's accurate to say most Muslim women in western countries do not cover.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 8:40:25 AM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa
Most women do not wear the covering because of the will of God or because Qur'an tells them so. Most wear because men make them. In Afghanistan when Taliban was overthrown many women choose not to wear the coverings any longer. Did God change? NO! Did the Qur'an change? NO! The men in power changed.

Why do not most Muslim women in western countries wear these coverings ? Same God, same Qur'an. Different men in power is why.


It's true that the Taliban turned covering into a form of oppression.  However, I don't know if it's true that "most" Muslim women only cover because men make them.  In my city, we have a large Muslim community.  The university I attend has many young Muslim women in the school and most of them cover.  I have seen Muslim women working at child care centers, grocery stores, even Wal-Mart and all of them have been covered.  When I lived in Los Angeles, my experience was similar.  I'm not sure it's accurate to say most Muslim women in western countries do not cover.


I too see many Muslim woman cover themselves. What we can not easily see is Muslim women who do not cover. These women are not different appearing than not Muslim women so we not notice. We only notice the ones who cover. The amount of Muslims in America is large. Different numbers depending on which web site you seek. All in the millions. If there were millions of women wearing the coverings in America I think they would be far more noticeable.

I do not know for sure. I have been in Syria once and Turkey twice (my grandpappy lives in Turkey) and I do not have favorable opinions of how women are treated in those countries. Turkey is more progressive than the others Muslim countries but still women are not treated well. This is only my limited experience but is real and not from web or television.

oh shit. Have I been jacking my own thread? LOL

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 8:47:47 AM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I would say that it's a kink if he finds it erotic or sexually exciting, which is a pretty sure bet, or he probably wouldn't be interested in it. If it doesn't have an erotic or sexual nature, then it's simply a preference for one person to be head-of-household; not a kink, just a system for decision-making.

All of the definitions I found when I looked up "kink" and "kinky" (excluding the other meaning which has nothing at all to do with BDSM - curly, twisted), linked the word closely with sex. Examples below:

"relating to, having, or appealing to unconventional tastes especially in sex ; also : sexually deviant"
"Showing or appealing to bizarre or deviant tastes, especially of a sexual or erotic nature"
"having or showing unusual ways of getting sexual excitement"

So, I think the attachment to sexual excitement is what makes an unusual preference a kink.




Sounds true. I am surprised what is considered kink. I did not think a women dominated household with no "standard" kinkiness is something people would call kink.

I know not really matter what is called. My curiosity comes from having men email me and these men only seek only dominant woman without any other kink. I wonder why they seek on collarme.

I did reply to 3 of them and ask if they thought they were kinky and why they search collarme. They all considered themselves kinky even when they not like kinky stuff. Two replied nicely and one called me c**t when he read my forum post about ice. lol

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 8:48:31 AM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline



You have a good point.  Women who don't cover don't stand out in the U.S.  All I can say is that I have seen more and more Muslim women who do cover in recent years.  I know that Wal-Mart used to have a policy that did not allow employees to wear any sort of head covering.  That has changed to allow Muslim employees to cover for religious reasons.  Maybe covering has come full circle and women are doing it because they choose it, not because they must.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:15:12 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikitaa
(is okay to start sentence with "but"?)


Technically, no. But it's one of those "rules" that people often break in everyday communications, and you'll also see it more commonly ignored in fiction than in business or legal writing.

The fact is, it can add an urgency and a "punch" to a writer's rhythm, if it's not overused. That's the reason it became a "rule" in the first place - elementary-level English teachers hammer it into the heads of their students so that they don't fall into the habit of starting every other sentence with it, because if it's not properly used, it can turn a paragraph into a jumbled pile of disconnected crap. But as the students grow older and become more adept at using the language, they begin to learn when and how to break those rules, so you'll find that it's widely ignored among most native English users. However, as I mentioned, in business and legal writing it is still commonly frowned upon, and many scholars recommend altering the sentence to replace the word "but" with "however", which often works as well if not better. But not always.

And the same goes for the word "and", by the way. One of my favorite scenes in "Finding Forrester" involves the older writer, Sean Connery, having a lively debate with his teenage protege regarding the propriety of the rule, in which the younger writer illustrates his point by starting almost every sentence with the words "but" or "and." It's an entertaining scene in an entertaining movie.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:25:11 AM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
I can understand it to some degree, as I don't consider myself much of a fetishist. My main kink is control, and although I am excited by certain activities that are clearly considered kinky, they're not terribly exciting without the presence of the control factor.

(in reply to Nikitaa)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:26:06 AM   
WiseCracknSadist


Posts: 163
Joined: 10/27/2006
Status: offline
If the domination is required for sexual arousal and climax then it would fall under fetish and then be classified as a kink.

If the domination is preffered due to love to serve or preffering for another to be responsible for day to day activities then it is a lifestyle choice and not kink.

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:37:41 AM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
ThatDamnedPanda, I agree with you 100%. I observe the rules of grammar and punctuation most of the time, but I throw them out the window when technically incorrect writing seems more effective, easier to read, or "sounds" better. And that happens a lot.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:52:34 AM   
MistressAinCT


Posts: 205
Joined: 2/21/2004
Status: offline
As a proDomme, I have dealt with many people who wanted the kink and only the kink-no service, not even conversation.  In other words: the physical.  Whether it got them arroused or not was not My concern.  The wanted to be topped and yes, it usually encompassed a fetish.

But I have have known many people who to serve is their only desire.  The innate sense of wanting to please without wanting anything in return (I just wish they were closer to My location) and that is what satisfies them. 

BUT: Is it still kink if there is no physicality or sexuality involved?  Think of a gentleman's gentleman-a valet.  Is what he does-service-considered a kink (that would make for some interesting talk!)?  Is what a concierge in a hotel does for his guests considered kink?  I think they might surprised by the answer.  Is service kinky? Ah--perhaps another thread...

If someone wants nothing more than to serve you, I say go with it.  But also be aware this could be a line to get you interested, since most people-Myself included-can be turned off by pushy slaves who list their likes, dislikes, etc.  After you get to know this person, the "i want"s might come out. 

The other side of the coin is what YOU want.  If you can't have a D/s relationship without the kink, then something like this won't do much for you.  BTW-you should also note that what YOU think is kink, might be just regular old standard procedure for some people.

What I have learned from this thread is that most people believe that kink is the physical that leads to something sexual.  I have never looked at kink that way; I have always thought it meant just having a different view on things, an askew view leading to different opinions, not necessarily relating to sex.  Maybe we throw around the word "kink" far too much.

_____________________________

When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow www.mobiusmetals.webs.com

So many toys-so little flesh...

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:54:34 AM   
MistressAinCT


Posts: 205
Joined: 2/21/2004
Status: offline
Oh..I should say, that some people can like leather-the look, the feel, the smell and not be into Fetishism.  They just like leather. 

_____________________________

When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow www.mobiusmetals.webs.com

So many toys-so little flesh...

(in reply to MistressAinCT)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? - 2/6/2009 9:58:27 AM   
Nikitaa


Posts: 416
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan




You have a good point.  Women who don't cover don't stand out in the U.S.  All I can say is that I have seen more and more Muslim women who do cover in recent years.  I know that Wal-Mart used to have a policy that did not allow employees to wear any sort of head covering.  That has changed to allow Muslim employees to cover for religious reasons.  Maybe covering has come full circle and women are doing it because they choose it, not because they must.

Yes you are correct. In America women cover because they choose. In other countries is often different. I did not live in Turkey, only visit for 10 days on two separate occasions so I do not really know kow many choose and how many do because they are expected.

Okay, I forgot what point I was making and where I was going with this topic. Hummmm. I hear is suppose to have nice weather this weekend in NYC.

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is seeking dominantion and only domination a kink? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109