Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:02:59 PM   
FullCircle


Posts: 5713
Joined: 11/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Number of neocortical neurons (females) = 19.3 billion (Pakkenberg, B., Pelvig, D., Marner,L., Bundgaard, M.J., Gundersen, H.J.G., Nyengaard, J.R. and Regeur, L. Aging and the human neocortex. Exp. Gerontology, 38:95-99, 2003 and Pakkenberg, B. and Gundersen, H.J.G. Neocortical neuron number in humans: effect of sex and age. J. Comp. Neurology, 384:312-320, 1997.)
Number of neocortical neurons (males) = 22.8 billion (Pakkenberg et al., 1997; 2003)


Deduct 15.3 billion neurons for needless shoe obsession and you can clearly see the numbers speak for themselves. I rest my case.


_____________________________

ﮒuקּƹɼ ƾɛϰưϫԼ Ƨωιϯϲћ.

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:06:42 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
How do people get over overwhelming anger appears to be the gist of your post.

Therapy.

Most people don't have crippling emotional reactions to things that just happen to others. We have these kind of reactions to things that happen to us. Usually things that happen during the formative years.

Now, in order to stop obsessing with what happened in the past, and be able to move on to a better future, you need to be able to think clearly about your past and share it with a safe and helpful person. Usually a trained therapist. Try one on one therapy if you can. Otherwise find a group therapy session of other women dealing with the same stuff. If you can't do that, then look in the phonebood for an ACOA meeting near you.

The work you do on yourself is essential to giving you a better future. One that doesn't involve you having emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the people you inflict them on, said people then deciding they don't want to have to deal with you anymore. You either keep recycling these unprofitable emotions, keep going over your hoard of grudges, or you learn how to pack your baggage up and get it out of the way. Your choice.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:22:05 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rednicky

I was looking at a little bit of social history and, regardless of the race or the advancement of a society, location, or time period, women seem to always be submissive to men (whether they like it or not). I was reading up on the cult that was discovered in America (Texas I believe) where the men would take advantage of the women and children and they were completely Dominated and brainwashed by men. Some women even helped the men by brainwashing the young! Why is this? Why is it that in every form of society, women are submissive to men? I mean, even today in America and other parts of the world, where women have gained true independence, they're still treated like objects, used for advertising and sex appeal. And, once a woman's sex appeal is gone, she is somewhat useless to society (unless she's got money). It's as if society turns they're back on women who are not young and pretty. Don't say that you don't see it. And so many women buy into it as well. Everywhere you look, it says that big tits, thin bodies, long hair, and promiscuity are best. And women are sitting back and saying "Okay yea. We can do that for men." And they jump through these hoops, starving themselves and going through these extremes attempting to be acceptable to men. Sure, there is some pressure on men, but it's no big deal if a man is older or out of shape. So, not only do so many women fall into the trap of doing anything in order to be pleasing to the opposite sex, they don't even put the same amount of pressure on men! It would be different if women said "yea, we'll look a certain way for you guys.


Yeah, that's how Oprah rose from a Southern shack with no running water or electricity to the mega star she is today not only worth millions over but can make a unrecognized author rich and famous over night, all over her amazing sex appeal.

All those short Mexican men cutting your lawns are epitomizing riches and all the great "value" we place on men. So are the 50isah odd thousand of young, male, bodies we shipped off to Vietnam to be ripped apart under enemy fire and that beautiful feminized landmine called "Bouncing Betty."

While I would readily agree with you men of all social class and races place a high premium on attractive looking females and will easily employ them over less attractive women, I will have to unfortunately break it to you, but most employed women in this world (same goes with men) are far from beauty queens or ideal sex symbols. Most men and women whether they work on a factory line at Harley Davidson or work in an office at IBM, are rather "average" looking people. Many in both sexes are often out-of-shape.

As for fashion, you apparently havn't read widely enough. I'll give you a hint, read up on the female sexual lib movement. If it were up to conservative leaning men, societies of the West would have remained "stable" (stable societies are like those of Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and so forth - think 2,000 year old traditions and Burhkas) in at least the area of fashion. Yo know were the Nun outfit comes from? It comes from the way women in general dressed hundreds of years ago in Europe. The fashion just remained "stable" longer within Catholic religious communities and not within Catholic secular societies. Think now of beaches in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. You see plenty of women in g-string bikinis and plenty of men in bikini trunks (which would be widely regarded as anathema to men and women in the U.S.

My own underwear actually, are European style boxer briefs and not the longer, baggy, Ametican style boxers.

quote:


But you guys have to look a certain way for 'us' too." That's not how things have worked. A 6 pack seems to be 'extra'. Something that's not needed but looks good on a guy anyway. But if a woman is not a certain weight, she is given hell.


Ok, your comment reveals you don't workout. Not surprising because few men or women in the United States workout - just look at the obesity and diabetic problems. The majority of women I see at college or walking down the street simply wash and throw on a pair of pants - quite a number of them can't even be bothered to spend that much time on their hair let alone plastering makeup across their face. Hands down, "working out" expends the most energy (energy = calories ironically). Depending on a person's metabolism, acquiring a "6 pack" is no easy task. In fact if it was so easy for men in general to look like the Spartan characters on the movie "300" every man would look like that. It takes an incredible amount of energy to reshape your body be you male or female.

And women given hell about their weight and not little obese boys becoming the butt of jokes? Give me a break. I've seen a young adult male friend of mine go to tears (all though he laughed to pretend to play it off) after being battered by jokes about his weight. And living in Wisconsin I see plenty of heafty if not obese women walking around. My tech college in fact, had almost empty stair cases (which by the way I walked up 99% of the time) because most the 20ish something year old students - male and female - always herded around the elevators to make their way up a single fuckin floor at times. Sweet Jesus! I'm in my late 30's, have had a harsh lifetsyle with alcohol consumption and so forth, and I'm still in better physical shape than most of the 20ish year old people I encounter (that goes for females in their 20's).

quote:


So even though things are better, things are not how they 'should' be and it surprises me at how long it is taking and how little women are doing to obtain true equality.


Well keep waiting. The more things change the more they stay the same. I won't hold my breath for an egalitarian society to emerge over night. I suspect their will always remain "classes" in society. There has never been a pointy in U.S. history were poor people didn't exist - we are currently the richest nation to ever have existed in human history. Go tell some homeless person living in Detroit that though.

(in reply to rednicky)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:34:45 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: awmslave

I do not believe genetic component can be automatically extrapolated into advanced human societal behavioral norms.


Yes it can.

Human mating strategies.

Most all of civilization, and how all societies operate, can be traced to mating strategies of the human species.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to awmslave)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:57:58 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rednicky

I just don't understand. And it's making me question myself as a fully capable woman. Maybe I'm a glitch and women were never really meant to have as much power as men. Maybe I'm fighting for something that is unobtainable. Because so many women seem to be content with the way things are now. I for one do not like how our bodies do the talking. But so many other women do. And not enough women recognize the real damage that being viewed as an object is causing.



Most men don’t look like Daniel Craig in “Casino Royal.”
http://l.yimg.com/img.movies.yahoo.com/ymv/us/img/hv/photo/movie_pix/mgm/casino_royale/daniel_craig/royale17.jpg  

Most men don’t look like this guy either (though I’m sure you only see the woman as the one epitomizing sex appeal and an unobtainable physique pushed unfairly by media and men).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j0nmJ0_cvc

I think you would do well to take some notes from the President of Chile – no ultra thin beauty queen herself – and look at her credentials.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Bachelet

Excerpt.
quote:

Verónica Michelle Bachelet Jeria (born September 29, 1951) is a center-left politician and the current President of Chile—the first woman to hold this position in the country's history. She won the 2006 presidential election in a runoff, beating center-right billionaire businessman and former senator Sebastián Piñera, with 53.5% of the vote. A moderate Socialist, she campaigned on a platform of continuing Chile's free market policies, while increasing social benefits to help reduce the country's gap between rich and poor. She was inaugurated on March 11, 2006.
Bachelet—a pediatrician and epidemiologist with studies in military strategy—served as Health Minister and Defense Minister under President Ricardo Lagos. She is a separated mother of three and a self-described agnostic[1]. A polyglot, she speaks Spanish, English, German, Portuguese and French.[2] In 2008, Forbes magazine ranked her as 25th in the list of the 100 most powerful women in the world[3] (she was #27 in 2007[4], and #17 in 2006[5]). In 2008, TIME magazine ranked her 15 on its list of the world's 100 most influential people.[6]


< Message edited by UPSG -- 2/14/2009 3:00:04 PM >

(in reply to rednicky)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 2:58:33 PM   
awmslave


Posts: 599
Joined: 3/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Most all of civilization, and how all societies operate, can be traced to mating strategies of the human species.


It is higly debatable how much sexual behavior determines the society. It has not changed dramatically in thousand years.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 5:11:30 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
Hmm... not sure why the youtube link didn't work, maybe it will this time?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j0nmJ0_cvc

(in reply to awmslave)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 9:11:16 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: awmslave

quote:

Most all of civilization, and how all societies operate, can be traced to mating strategies of the human species.


It is higly debatable how much sexual behavior determines the society. It has not changed dramatically in thousand years.



It's not "highly debatable" at all.

And it's not "sexual behavior".  It's mating strategies.

You might not have been exposed to evolutionary psychology before, in any depth.  I'd recommend "The Evolution of Desire" as a starting point.  It's a few years old, but is a good starting point, even if it's a little more dense than a general "self-help" book.

A more entertaining, and more current read (although not as scientifically detailed, and likely to give you a "Who says this is true?" moment or two) is "Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters".

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to awmslave)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 9:22:45 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

genders are equal

Individuals are not



What the hottie said.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/14/2009 10:00:25 PM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel
IF( that isn't you in the picture)
{
Original Text deleted because women can't think straight and never have anything valid to say anyway.
}
else if (that is you in the picture)
{
I find your statements very relevant and show a level of understanding of the human experience to be beyond that which most people can ever hope to achieve. It seems that simply accepting the elegant simplicity and essential need for difference, is to much for our modern contorted minds to grasp.  If everyone could only realize that differences are necessary and actually are required for new human life to be created, nurtured, protected, and grow up healthy, then the world would be a better place.

Fuck me now.
}

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 12:12:52 AM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rednicky

I was looking at a little bit of social history and, regardless of the race or the advancement of a society, location, or time period, women seem to always be submissive to men (whether they like it or not). I was reading up on the cult that was discovered in America (Texas I believe) where the men would take advantage of the women and children and they were completely Dominated and brainwashed by men. Some women even helped the men by brainwashing the young! Why is this? Why is it that in every form of society, women are submissive to men? I mean, even today in America and other parts of the world, where women have gained true independence, they're still treated like objects, used for advertising and sex appeal. And, once a woman's sex appeal is gone, she is somewhat useless to society (unless she's got money). It's as if society turns they're back on women who are not young and pretty. Don't say that you don't see it. And so many women buy into it as well. Everywhere you look, it says that big tits, thin bodies, long hair, and promiscuity are best. And women are sitting back and saying "Okay yea. We can do that for men." And they jump through these hoops, starving themselves and going through these extremes attempting to be acceptable to men. Sure, there is some pressure on men, but it's no big deal if a man is older or out of shape. So, not only do so many women fall into the trap of doing anything in order to be pleasing to the opposite sex, they don't even put the same amount of pressure on men! It would be different if women said "yea, we'll look a certain way for you guys. But you guys have to look a certain way for 'us' too." That's not how things have worked. A 6 pack seems to be 'extra'. Something that's not needed but looks good on a guy anyway. But if a woman is not a certain weight, she is given hell.

So even though things are better, things are not how they 'should' be and it surprises me at how long it is taking and how little women are doing to obtain true equality.

Why is it that, regardless of the surroundings, women as a whole, seem to follow men blindly? Especially when there are more women than men ANYWAY! And, at this point, it's not a matter of submission. It's submitting to the wills of men that are obviously wrong. A woman knows that a man shouldn't be beating her child. A woman knows a man shouldn't be beating 'her'. Hell, men don't put up with being hit by each other. Why do so many woman think it's okay to be hit or subjected to treatment that men themselves don't even tolerate? I'd like to believe that women are just as capable, independent, smart, and expect to share equal power with men. But I just don't see it. And the little I do see is such a small amount that it is easily overlooked. It's almost like the few women who have sought after true equality are simply a glitch in the mind frame of the female. Are women just fooling themselves into thinking that they are equal to men? Because they certainly haven't shown it very much in the past. Just like men as a whole took it upon themselves to be the dominant sex, why didn't women as a whole say "No. We shall be equal or not work together at all"? Matter of fact, it was men who took it upon themselves to show women respect as a sex. And had not the bible been around to actually tell them to respect their wives, I don't even think we'd get 'that' much. Some men "don't" and "haven't" treated their women with respect in certain areas...and women just sit there and take it.

Now I'm not going on a man-hating rant. I like men. And I praise God that I live in America where men respect women (to some extent.) But I just don't like how long it's taken to get to this point. I feel like, were we to isolate a group of men and women on, say, a deserted tropical island, leaving them to develop their own government, men would be in charge...and women wouldn't object.

I just don't understand. And it's making me question myself as a fully capable woman. Maybe I'm a glitch and women were never really meant to have as much power as men. Maybe I'm fighting for something that is unobtainable. Because so many women seem to be content with the way things are now. I for one do not like how our bodies do the talking. But so many other women do. And not enough women recognize the real damage that being viewed as an object is causing.

I'll briefly mention D/s but this thread really has nothing to do with it. I would like to be submissive to another man but not if it means playing into societies way of thinking about women. I've stepped back an looked at the big picture. Me submitting to a man would just be 1 more women playing her part as the submissive woman that I 'should' be. And I don't want to send that message. I guess what I'm looking for is reassurance. Reassurance that I (we) are just as good as any man could ever be. But how can I...when history has proven me so very very wrong time and time again?

Once again, this has nothing to do with bdsm. I'm speaking of people in general. And, this time, I'm open to any and all comments. I know I wasn't before and I'm sorry. My self esteem right now is in the shitter and I just want to know how other women do it. How do other women live without being so angry like me. I want to live in a certain way that'll make me happy (a D/s lifestyle). But not if it means reinforcing the very ideas about women that I hate. But this conflict that is going on within me is tearing me apart and making me very unhappy. I want to ignore the world and do what I want to do. But I can't do what I want to do when men, the unspoken leaders of the world, still have these terrible ideas about women. Hopefully you understand me.


No.

(in reply to rednicky)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 12:14:39 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
This is a jumpthrough, and I want the OP to read it. The rest of you, do what you want.

There are not only environmental, but also physical factors involved in the basic tendency of Women being submissive to Men. To understand it, at least to the best of our ability, requires a few things considered first. The origins of mankind, which are not agreed upon by any stretch, but the commonalities thereof.

I am a highly intelligent but less educated person than many here, but that gives me a perspective that is a bit unusual, in other words I could tell you how to build a nuclear bomb but sometimes I don't even know what day it is. So take this in that light red, I am not the Messiah, nor anything more than some dude who wants to say something.

The reason that Woman is naturally subserviant to Man is because of nature and how we developed. In the beginning we were of course primates, and were nomadic. Had no need nor desire for a home. When that was the case, we lived as animals, but we lived. Eventually somehow we developed some sense of family, and whether that happened before or after we started "civilizing" is a topic for a different debate. Suffice it to say that it did happen.

In the beginning we lived on top of rocks, in caves, trees whatever, we were animals, In time we got together, just as animals do, and formed communities. We do differ from let's say ants and bees, because we were not all of one family. In a bee's nest, all the bees have the same Mother. We are different. That is the kind of organism we are. They are what they are and we are what we are.

In the early days (obviously) Man finds Woman, copulation happens of course, and thus we exist. Our differences with the animal kingdom are not so profound as we might like to think. For example wolves and eagles mate for life, we tried that and it doesn't work for many. But that is a different subject. The fact that matter is that we developed somehow and went on to progress into our brave new world.

That progress is IMO what caused this basic shift of power to the Man, and the reason is clear to me. Eventually mankind settles down a bit, no longer an animal he takes a mate. Back then she was as strong as he was. But things changed. When mankind took to building houses and claiming land, a fundamental shift took place.

Woman and Man cohabitated and had kids of course, proven by the fact that we are here. So they up and build some sort of shelter. Be it a hut made of grass or mud, or whatever there were certain constants imposed by nature, and those are the hardest to ignore.

Now picture this a few centuries later, they got some land, animals and crops, the agrarian society of yesteryear, when there was no help for anyone. People either lived or died. We are obviously the descendants of those who lived.

Now you have a farm and a herd of something, meat of some sort, maybe some chickens. Whatever. It is long ago and there is no enfamil, or any type of formula for the offspring. The only way the baby can eat is via breast feeding, so there is no choice. Now picture a Woman having to do that while plowing a field.

So that task falls upon the Man. In time, over generations, Darwin or no Darwin, what do you think will happen ? The Man becomes physically stronger and takes care of the farming etc., while the Woman takes care of the kids. Each job may be demanding, but in different ways. So over generations the Man becomes on average, larger and physically stronger, while the Woman does not  Without yet addressing the feelings then, we need to move on.

Within time, the Man's girth grows larger in the arm than the Woman's leg. He gets strong, and as history happens things happen. The Men are now seen as the protectors of the Women. The Women then start to try to please their Man. The Man brings home the bacon literally, and the Woman cooks it. When trouble comes, it is up to him to deal with it.

Realize that I am just reporting this, the environment and our physical makeup made it happen. Don't kill the messanger. Over the centuries, the "mindset" develops. This may be the basis but is reinforced by another entire force.

In time they get conditioned to it, and different attitudes become evident. With the Men having to plan, plow and till the fields tio provide for themselves and their families with the results coming in months later, and Women having to take care of those families due to the location of breasts, which were still the only source of food for the offspring, which seem to have to eat like twenty two times a day, there was no other option. For them it was life or death, and really it was for us as well.

As the years went by, people did what came natural. This is where sports came from, Men trying to impresss the Women. Women doing themselves up with makeup or fancy clothe etc., as they settled into their assigned roles in society, that is assigned by nature.

Don't look at me, I dint doit. Your God did it. Thing is we who are progressive have realized that these attributes eventualy became stereotypes, and subsequently became not even that, irrelevant in the modern world. This may be encouraging for any wierdos like us or open minded person, but that "programming" of the human mind took place a long time ago, and it is not undone easily.

No matter what your concious attitude is, deep inside there is a suconcious that contians things like instinct. Did you think animals got their instinct from thin air ? Heck no. There is a biological mechanism by which this happens, and it has happened to us.

I know things have changed but

________________

I will leave it at that. I did not follow the crowd, I gave you my answer.

T

(in reply to rednicky)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 3:34:40 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

This is where sports came from, Men trying to impresss the Women.



That certainly is an unusual take on it.

The popularity of sports has its roots in England, where sport was a national past time long before the rest of the world took note. Sport arose as a contest between men, usually involving sporadic violence.

Sport as we know it in the modern world, was a mechanism for breeding the English gentleman: amateurism, fair play, co-operation, individualism and voluntary association were all promoted through team sports such as football, cricket and rugby.

Men trying to impress women? Hardly. More like the English breeding men as a means of safeguarding the empire and reinforcing the view of many Englishmen of the day: the view being that the English were a cut above the rest of the world.

< Message edited by NorthernGent -- 2/15/2009 3:36:21 AM >


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 3:54:17 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

The popularity of sports has its roots in England, where sport was a national past time long before the rest of the world took note. Sport arose as a contest between men, usually involving sporadic violence.


I'm certain that sports were popular long before England was even conceived.  Sports started as demonstrations of warrior's athletic prowess and skill, and they were popular in ancient societies all over the world. 

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 4:01:09 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

The popularity of sports has its roots in England, where sport was a national past time long before the rest of the world took note. Sport arose as a contest between men, usually involving sporadic violence.


I'm certain that sports were popular long before England was even conceived.  Sports started as demonstrations of warrior's athletic prowess and skill, and they were popular in ancient societies all over the world. 



Correct, but widespread participation in sports (among all classes) is another matter. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the rest of Europe couldn't understand the English fixation with sport. Even at the outbreak of WW1, the Germans believed that their culture was superior to English culture on the grounds that the English spent too much time with leisure pursuits: namely sport.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 5:17:37 AM   
CatdeMedici


Posts: 2257
Joined: 10/20/2008
Status: offline
Standing toe to toe, I don't want to be equal, if that were the case, the ying and the yang of humanity would be screwed. We are polar opposites in key areas by design. I think to generalize strength or weakness by gender, class, race or task is ignorant.
 
I want equal opportunities,  I don't want it presumed or mandated that because I am woman, I can't possibly do xxx or xxx and I want to see the same for exist for men, they should be able to do xxx or xxx. I also want to the same for all races and all ethinicity-I think all this one up manship is what is breaking down our world--its a waste of time.
 
I do not nor have I ever followed ANY human being blindly, male or female. I have always made My own way, My own decisions and gathered My own selected circle--male and female. Though raised in the era of the 1950's household, I didn't have one, My parents participated in life, home management, child raising equally--there was never a moment in our house when anyone felt, looked ar acted less than an equal participating member of society-much to the chagrin of extended family.
 
I have never in business or the world felt one moment that I was not equal or better at selected tasks, there are also tasks I am not good at, not because I am a woman but because of "I" the individual. My income, My ability to make decisions and accomplish goals and objectives or lack of it has been influenced by one person and one person only--Me--because I never chose to believe or behave otherwise.
 
I am a manless single parent by choice--not because I am better or worse than men, or stronger or weaker, but because that is the design of life that works for Me.
 
If we don't stop trying to define who is better and start pulling the individual capabilities together to fix this world--it won't matter because we will all die at the same rate. 
 
 
 
 

_____________________________

I am the Cat, holder of the whip and chair.

"Let's see-whips, dips, chains, chips, yep sounds like a party to Me!"

(in reply to rednicky)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 7:04:16 AM   
Irishknight


Posts: 2016
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
My wife is a braniac.  I'm no slouch in the thinking department but I believe that she holds more book smarts than I do.   I also think she always will.  On the other hand, she cannot lift nearly as much as I can. 
My wife is very artsy and crafty and can knit, sew, crochet, weave and spin her own thread.  I can create with wood and stone in ways that make no sense to her.  She has patience to sit and create clothing from raw wool all the way to a sweater.  I have patience to wait for hours on end to kill a deer to feed our family. 
Is my wife equal to me in what I do?  Hell no.  Am I equal to her in what she does?  Hell no! 

If she does the same job as me, she needs to get the same pay as me but that is as far as I think "equality" needs to go.  Men and women are different by nature.  We need to stop trying to change that and just be who the fuck we are.

(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 11:16:52 AM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

The popularity of sports has its roots in England, where sport was a national past time long before the rest of the world took note. Sport arose as a contest between men, usually involving sporadic violence.


I'm certain that sports were popular long before England was even conceived.  Sports started as demonstrations of warrior's athletic prowess and skill, and they were popular in ancient societies all over the world. 



Correct, but widespread participation in sports (among all classes) is another matter. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the rest of Europe couldn't understand the English fixation with sport. Even at the outbreak of WW1, the Germans believed that their culture was superior to English culture on the grounds that the English spent too much time with leisure pursuits: namely sport.


I was going to agree with SB, but maybe I'd be better off ceding you both may offer good points. I can't really pretend to know much about the history of sports among mankind - interesting subject matter though - but I do know many societies were engaged in sporting activities before England arose from barbarism. Actually, fencing could be regarded as an early sport. I'm actually reading a book on that now written by Brit. Apparently many of the terms used in fencing are French and the art was learned in England from the French. On another interesting note, apparently old manuscript depict drawings of Christian monks teaching young men how to sword fight and wrestle. Apparently monks were regarded as top notch wrestlers in the 13th or 12th century. I found that interesting because it kind of parallels some of the historical developments in Eastern martial arts.

Tem, humans are animals, our "kingdom" is "animal" we are hence part of the animal kingdom. And the Theory of Evolution does not work the way you suggested but many people have this impression it does. Men do not keep jumping higher and then their progeny are born jumping as high as them. This concept is considered anathema in evolutionary science.

While I believe in evolution it is from my observation, partly a very popular theory among many of us lay people to science, because it is taught with the methodology employed in religion and story telling. Your methodolgy of imparting what you might regard as truisms about evolution is the same method found amound Biblical authors.

Evolution is a good theory in my opinion, because it offers a good biological explanation for the unity and diversity of life (not just human, all cellular life forms). That said, within the context of "observational science" which emphasizies observable experiments that can be performed with reproducing the same results over and over again among scientific peers, evolution remains more theory than principle.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 11:31:13 AM   
chainedgirl


Posts: 142
Joined: 2/5/2005
Status: offline
You left out the various tribes around the world, where the women were/are in control and the civilisations through ancient history that were either matriarchal or where women were treated with equal respect to men.

Don't confuse equality with same.  I do not want to be a man, I just wanted to be treated as equal to one - with an equal right to live the life I choose, to earn the same pay for the same work and to have a say who I have sex with.


_____________________________

http://slaveinchains.blogspot.com/

(in reply to came4U)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? - 2/15/2009 3:05:40 PM   
awmslave


Posts: 599
Joined: 3/31/2006
Status: offline
   
quote:

It's not "highly debatable" at all.

And it's not "sexual behavior".  It's mating strategies.

You might not have been exposed to evolutionary psychology before, in any depth.  I'd recommend "The Evolution of Desire" as a starting point.  It's a few years old, but is a good starting point, even if it's a little more dense than a general "self-help" book.

A more entertaining, and more current read (although not as scientifically detailed, and likely to give you a "Who says this is true?" moment or two) is "Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters".

quote:

In a provocative study, Buss, a University of Michigan psychology professor, attributes these differences to ingrained psychological mechanisms which he argues are universal across cultures and rooted in each gender's adaptive responses over millennia of human evolution.



Thanks for the ideas. It is certainly worth to think through. Of course, I am skeptical. Just reading the synopsis makes me to suspect that professor Buss tries to explain too much based on mating strategies. Just a suspicion, I need to read it first.

(in reply to chainedgirl)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Are women 'really' equal to men? Truely? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094