Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Afghanistan


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Afghanistan Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Afghanistan - 3/11/2009 11:46:17 PM   
MasterShake69


Posts: 752
Joined: 11/30/2005
Status: offline
Our military is an all volunteer force.  If you don’t want to fight and except the risks of the job then don’t join up.     for over 50 years democrat and republican administrations both liberal and conservative felt it was necessary to have US forces in s Korea.  The reason was to prevent a war which would cause many lives to be lost.


< Message edited by MasterShake69 -- 3/11/2009 11:47:13 PM >

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Afghanistan - 3/11/2009 11:48:16 PM   
MasterShake69


Posts: 752
Joined: 11/30/2005
Status: offline
just edited my post to say s Korea...some nitpicker would be screaming i don’t know north from south ;)

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Afghanistan - 3/11/2009 11:59:21 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: CraZYWiLLiE
Lets bring home our Military from Korea and Germany over 200, 000 troops

What do you suppose the long-term repercussions of that would be?

Well, for one, it would be a hit to the economy of those countries.  Let's face it.  Soldiers spend money in the places they are deployed.  Same bucks could be spent here, or there could be fewer in the military to help our national budget.

There's also that small thing about having fathers, mothers, husbands, wives, sons and daughters home with their families. 


I'm going to assume your reply was serious.
May I rephrase the question?
If we pulled our troops from South Korea and Germany, what do think the long-term consequences, aside from the lpss of American capital, to South Korea, Asia, Germany, and Europe? Specifically, would said removal make the aforementioned areas safer or less safe, and by what degree? Even more specifically, how many tens or hundreds of thousands of  Asians would die as a result of said pullout?



My reply was absolutely serious.

Now, let's ask you a question.  Since you mention how many Asian lives might be lost.  (Happens to be BS, btw.)

What are the lives of the members  of your family worth to you?  One?  Ten?  A hundred?  Thousands?

I know how many American families would be reunited.  I know how many American lives would be saved.  All of them.

 
Had I been forced to bet I of course would have bet you would have refused- or been unable- to answer the q.
My family has fought in every war this country has fought since my ancestor Gen Gates commanded the middle colonies under another ancestor named Washington. Should she decide to serve my only grandchild- so far- could be a fourth generation paratrooper. We're familiar with  the cost of freedom.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Afghanistan - 3/12/2009 5:40:34 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

just edited my post to say s Korea...some nitpicker would be screaming i don’t know north from south ;)

Actually, I would have let that one go.

Instead, I'll just point out that there is no official declaration of peace.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Afghanistan - 3/12/2009 6:04:53 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: CraZYWiLLiE
Lets bring home our Military from Korea and Germany over 200, 000 troops

What do you suppose the long-term repercussions of that would be?

Well, for one, it would be a hit to the economy of those countries.  Let's face it.  Soldiers spend money in the places they are deployed.  Same bucks could be spent here, or there could be fewer in the military to help our national budget.

There's also that small thing about having fathers, mothers, husbands, wives, sons and daughters home with their families. 


I'm going to assume your reply was serious.
May I rephrase the question?
If we pulled our troops from South Korea and Germany, what do think the long-term consequences, aside from the lpss of American capital, to South Korea, Asia, Germany, and Europe? Specifically, would said removal make the aforementioned areas safer or less safe, and by what degree? Even more specifically, how many tens or hundreds of thousands of  Asians would die as a result of said pullout?



My reply was absolutely serious.

Now, let's ask you a question.  Since you mention how many Asian lives might be lost.  (Happens to be BS, btw.)

What are the lives of the members  of your family worth to you?  One?  Ten?  A hundred?  Thousands?

I know how many American families would be reunited.  I know how many American lives would be saved.  All of them.

 
Had I been forced to bet I of course would have bet you would have refused- or been unable- to answer the q.
My family has fought in every war this country has fought since my ancestor Gen Gates commanded the middle colonies under another ancestor named Washington. Should she decide to serve my only grandchild- so far- could be a fourth generation paratrooper. We're familiar with  the cost of freedom.


Then you're familiar with how high a price that is to pay.

It's not that I don't have My own projections of the possible repercussions of pulling out of South Korea.  I do.  It's just that the fact of the matter is that I honestly don't care as much about what happens in that country as I care about what happens in this one.  It sounds terribly callous and you probably think it's the wrong one, but it's the right answer for Me.

I'm just a simple military wife, who now has her husband serving in the same place that her father did decades ago.  I live in a military town where I've seen too damn many military funerals.  I refuse to let anyone think that it's easy. 

BTW, I'm going to thank you for your service.  It's just a shame that you can't seem to understand Mine.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Afghanistan - 3/12/2009 4:54:09 PM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
I had no idea that a decedent of Washington was among us...wow.

Back to reality...

OUR freedom is not what is at stake with our abroad missions and deployments. Other people in other countries who are responsible for their own freedom...those people are who are stake. And frankly, we fought for our freedom, they need grab their balls and fight for theirs. I'm tired of American lives being lost in countries where not one of those people will remember the person that just died for them. OUR brothers and sisters and daughters and sons and husbands and fathers and mothers and wives deserve better.

We are not thanked for the efforts that we take to help other countries and quite often we take political heat for it. fuck it...I'm tired of of seeing American hands being held out to help people and American dollars being spent elsewhere. Bring them home. All of them. Now.

boi


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Afghanistan - 3/12/2009 8:14:52 PM   
MasterShake69


Posts: 752
Joined: 11/30/2005
Status: offline
whenever we start ignoring the world it comesback to bite us.

We closed our eyes to the rise of the nazis....America knew all about what the nazis were doing to the jews.

the words never again mean nothing.

http://www.unitedhumanrights.org/Genocide/genocide_in_rwanda.htm
Beginning on April 6, 1994, and for the next hundred days, up to 800,000 Tutsis were killed by Hutu militia using clubs and machetes, with as many as 10,000 killed each day. Rwanda is one of the smallest countries in Central Africa, with just 7 million people, and is comprised of two main ethnic groups, the Hutu and the Tutsi. Although the Hutus account for 90 percent of the population, in the past, the Tutsi minority was considered the aristocracy of Rwanda and dominated Hutu peasants for decades, especially while Rwanda was under Belgian colonial rule.




quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

I had no idea that a decedent of Washington was among us...wow.

Back to reality...

OUR freedom is not what is at stake with our abroad missions and deployments. Other people in other countries who are responsible for their own freedom...those people are who are stake. And frankly, we fought for our freedom, they need grab their balls and fight for theirs. I'm tired of American lives being lost in countries where not one of those people will remember the person that just died for them. OUR brothers and sisters and daughters and sons and husbands and fathers and mothers and wives deserve better.

We are not thanked for the efforts that we take to help other countries and quite often we take political heat for it. fuck it...I'm tired of of seeing American hands being held out to help people and American dollars being spent elsewhere. Bring them home. All of them. Now.

boi


(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 5:57:53 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Oddly enough, the article that you linked specifically states that, after UN forces pulled out, it was the rebels who ended the internal problems of the country.  So, like boiJen said, because we weren't there, they fought for their own rights without American lives having to be lost.  Plus, we didn't spend this country's resources into a country that doesn't benefit us anyway.

The nice attempt to get the bleeding heart angle wasn't bad, but it didn't work to support your argument. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 6:40:34 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

We are not thanked for the efforts that we take to help other countries and quite often we take political heat for it. fuck it...I'm tired of of seeing American hands being held out to help people and American dollars being spent elsewhere. Bring them home. All of them. Now.


We can do that, but be careful what you ask for.  Cutting back the military means downsizing troop strength.  All those ex-military personal are then faced with finding jobs. 

Now that being said, whether you like it or not, we have reasons for maintaining overseas military installations besides helping out foreign people.  Our economy is tied to the rest of the world.  Our strength abroad is an intricate part of protecting our economic and political interests around the globe. 

The military is not a club for people to join for a paycheck and benefits.  It's a job, and it's voluntary.  I feel for families that have members overseas, but the simple fact of the matter is that it's voluntary. 

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 8:21:30 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: CraZYWiLLiE
Lets bring home our Military from Korea and Germany over 200, 000 troops

What do you suppose the long-term repercussions of that would be?

Well, for one, it would be a hit to the economy of those countries.  Let's face it.  Soldiers spend money in the places they are deployed.  Same bucks could be spent here, or there could be fewer in the military to help our national budget.

There's also that small thing about having fathers, mothers, husbands, wives, sons and daughters home with their families. 


I'm going to assume your reply was serious.
May I rephrase the question?
If we pulled our troops from South Korea and Germany, what do think the long-term consequences, aside from the lpss of American capital, to South Korea, Asia, Germany, and Europe? Specifically, would said removal make the aforementioned areas safer or less safe, and by what degree? Even more specifically, how many tens or hundreds of thousands of  Asians would die as a result of said pullout?



My reply was absolutely serious.

Now, let's ask you a question.  Since you mention how many Asian lives might be lost.  (Happens to be BS, btw.)

What are the lives of the members  of your family worth to you?  One?  Ten?  A hundred?  Thousands?

I know how many American families would be reunited.  I know how many American lives would be saved.  All of them.

 
Had I been forced to bet I of course would have bet you would have refused- or been unable- to answer the q.
My family has fought in every war this country has fought since my ancestor Gen Gates commanded the middle colonies under another ancestor named Washington. Should she decide to serve my only grandchild- so far- could be a fourth generation paratrooper. We're familiar with  the cost of freedom.


Then you're familiar with how high a price that is to pay.

It's not that I don't have My own projections of the possible repercussions of pulling out of South Korea.  I do.  It's just that the fact of the matter is that I honestly don't care as much about what happens in that country as I care about what happens in this one.  It sounds terribly callous and you probably think it's the wrong one, but it's the right answer for Me.

I'm just a simple military wife, who now has her husband serving in the same place that her father did decades ago.  I live in a military town where I've seen too damn many military funerals.  I refuse to let anyone think that it's easy. 

BTW, I'm going to thank you for your service.  It's just a shame that you can't seem to understand Mine.


LP, it's not so much that I don't undertsand your service as much as I was ignorant of it- although I freely admit I have never been a military wife or daughter Thank you for service, and fot that of your family.

It has been national policy, not often directly stated but national policy nonetheless, that we would never let the world strategic situation deteriorate to a point analogous to, say, 1939. That has been an expensive policy. Has it been less expensive than letting the world go to hell in a nuclear handbasket?  No way to know for sure.

The Sheriff's Department is expensive too.....

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 8:35:17 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

We can do that, but be careful what you ask for.  Cutting back the military means downsizing troop strength.  All those ex-military personal are then faced with finding jobs. 

Now that being said, whether you like it or not, we have reasons for maintaining overseas military installations besides helping out foreign people.  Our economy is tied to the rest of the world.  Our strength abroad is an intricate part of protecting our economic and political interests around the globe. 

The military is not a club for people to join for a paycheck and benefits.  It's a job, and it's voluntary.  I feel for families that have members overseas, but the simple fact of the matter is that it's voluntary. 


Yes because our people spending money else where right now has helped us SO much economically. Yep... I can see it now.

The reality is this...you bring them to enforce our borders and OUR primary military needs and troop strength doesn't diminish. Our "interests" around the globe are actually minimal at this rate. Part of what has driven us into our current economic mess is spending (something like) 8 million dollars a day on another country. And a great deal of that is spent through our military resources who could be giving our own country that kind of boost.

Yeah it's voluntary. It's a voluntary position that is practically handed to people from communities that enduring poverty. This is often the best job any of them could ever hope for and have been fed that their entire lives. Now... NOW their countrymen (civilians) and their leadership throw their lives away because their lives are expendable. That voluntary is taken with the understanding that their lives are supposed to be cared about and the value of their lives will be considered before taking military action. Repeated occupation of countries that will do just fine without us and sacrificing their lives is not taking into consideration their lives and their value.

And besides when the fuck did it become our military's job to take care of economic and political interests? I thought it was their job to take our physical and strategic safety and guarantee tomorrow for Americans. I thought it was their job to stand on a wall at night so that a civilian didn't have to. I did not think it was their job to go around kissing babies and rebuilding other people's countries because they were dumb enough to harbor  terrorists or pick fights with their neighbors.

boi




_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 8:43:14 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

LP, it's not so much that I don't undertsand your service as much as I was ignorant of it- although I freely admit I have never been a military wife or daughter Thank you for service, and fot that of your family.

It has been national policy, not often directly stated but national policy nonetheless, that we would never let the world strategic situation deteriorate to a point analogous to, say, 1939. That has been an expensive policy. Has it been less expensive than letting the world go to hell in a nuclear handbasket?  No way to know for sure.

The Sheriff's Department is expensive too.....



Last I checked the Soviet Union fell in '91 and the Cold War was over then. And Iran has no intention of changing their own nuclear policy. And frankly, they shouldn't change it. Currently there's enough nuclear explosives ready to launch that the entire human population would not survive. I wouldn't worry about 1 or 2 more.

And yeah the Sheriff's Department is expensive and funny enough, their salaries aren't paid for by the next county over...they're paid for by the country they operate in. Again...world wide sheriff's department is not our job. And frankly, taking it on is killing the American economy...let's not get into our loss of life around it.

Finally, it's a shitty disposition to treat someone poorly because you assume they know nothing about what it is be part of the military or a military family and then be Mr.Nice Guy afterward. A military family, as you should know, doesn't just extend to the direct family of a serviceman or woman. It extends to their friends who worry and are just as active in supporting them as their family.

Now pardon me while I go finish a quilt for a soldier returning to Afghanistan in August.

boi


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 8:57:21 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

LP, it's not so much that I don't undertsand your service as much as I was ignorant of it- although I freely admit I have never been a military wife or daughter Thank you for service, and fot that of your family.

It has been national policy, not often directly stated but national policy nonetheless, that we would never let the world strategic situation deteriorate to a point analogous to, say, 1939. That has been an expensive policy. Has it been less expensive than letting the world go to hell in a nuclear handbasket?  No way to know for sure.

The Sheriff's Department is expensive too.....



Last I checked the Soviet Union fell in '91 and the Cold War was over then. And Iran has no intention of changing their own nuclear policy. And frankly, they shouldn't change it. Currently there's enough nuclear explosives ready to launch that the entire human population would not survive. I wouldn't worry about 1 or 2 more.

And yeah the Sheriff's Department is expensive and funny enough, their salaries aren't paid for by the next county over...they're paid for by the country they operate in. Again...world wide sheriff's department is not our job. And frankly, taking it on is killing the American economy...let's not get into our loss of life around it.

Finally, it's a shitty disposition to treat someone poorly because you assume they know nothing about what it is be part of the military or a military family and then be Mr.Nice Guy afterward. A military family, as you should know, doesn't just extend to the direct family of a serviceman or woman. It extends to their friends who worry and are just as active in supporting them as their family.

Now pardon me while I go finish a quilt for a soldier returning to Afghanistan in August.

boi



I think it's insane not to worry about "one or two" more nuclear weapons if they are made/owned/controlled by someone more likely to use them.
LP and I have disagreed with each other on some things; we have a different world view. I fail to see how either of us have treated the other "poorly" or how I have a "shitty disposition".

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 9:06:03 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
How more likely do you get than a boat sitting outside of Cuba aiming it's weapons at us and daring us to make "one wrong move"?

And this...
"Had I been forced to bet I of course would have bet you would have refused- or been unable- to answer the q."
...is a shitty disposition.

boi


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 9:31:24 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

The reality is this...you bring them to enforce our borders and OUR primary military needs and troop strength doesn't diminish. Our "interests" around the globe are actually minimal at this rate. Part of what has driven us into our current economic mess is spending (something like) 8 million dollars a day on another country. And a great deal of that is spent through our military resources who could be giving our own country that kind of boost.


The "guard our borders" argument is a popular one, but it's a bogus one.  Who are they going to guard it from?  The military are not customs agents or immigration officers.  We have a problem with illegal immigrants crossing our southern border looking for work.  Do you want to put soldiers trained for warfare down on the border to stop poor Mexicans sneaking across looking for a job?  We aren't in any danger of Canada or Mexico invading us, so it's an absurd idea. 

The REALITY is that our interests around the world are rather large.  We depend on other regions of the world for our fuel, for one thing.  You can scream for alternative fuels all you want, but we don't have that capability yet.  We depend on our military to secure shipping lanes.  We'd be in deep shit if we were at the mercy of other nation's navies. 

quote:

Yeah it's voluntary. It's a voluntary position that is practically handed to people from communities that enduring poverty. This is often the best job any of them could ever hope for and have been fed that their entire lives. Now... NOW their countrymen (civilians) and their leadership throw their lives away because their lives are expendable. That voluntary is taken with the understanding that their lives are supposed to be cared about and the value of their lives will be considered before taking military action. Repeated occupation of countries that will do just fine without us and sacrificing their lives is not taking into consideration their lives and their value.


People join the military for a variety of reasons.  It's not all people from impoverished communities joining out of desperation.  Even the folks that do what your describing have other choices.  Pell grants, scholarships, working while going to school, or just plain moving to another area are all among them. 

You're being melodramatic when you say that their lives are being thrown away.  The military's purpose is warfare.  We are not taking in recruits, giving them a rifle, and then throwing them into the trenches.  Recruits are given extensive training, the best equipment in the world, and every effort is made to protect them.  Unfortunately death and injury are uncontrollable results of combat.  I don't know what repeated occupation of countries you're talking about.  We are occupying two countries right now.  We will be leaving one next year.  We are not occupying Germany, Japan, or South Korea.  We have military installations there as a result of our treaties with those nations.  We haven't "repeatedly" occupied any nation.

quote:

And besides when the fuck did it become our military's job to take care of economic and political interests? I thought it was their job to take our physical and strategic safety and guarantee tomorrow for Americans. I thought it was their job to stand on a wall at night so that a civilian didn't have to. I did not think it was their job to go around kissing babies and rebuilding other people's countries because they were dumb enough to harbor  terrorists or pick fights with their neighbors. 


When?  Since this country's inception.  Our first overseas military intervention was to protect American shipping; look up the Barbary Wars.  You can also study the Mexican War, which was fought solely to secure more territory for American expansion.  What do you think the reason for that expansion was?  I'll answer that question for you, it was economics.  If you want further examples, the Indian Wars were fought completely for territorial expansion in the pursuit of profit.  The Spanish-American War was fought under the guise of humanitarianism in order for us to grab up colonial holdings from the Spanish. 

I don't write any of this to be heartless.  I am an Army brat.  My father is a retired Colonel in the U.S. Army.  I do care about our people overseas.  But I am not for isolationism.  We tried that before, and it was a mistake.  We'd be living in a completely different and very scary world had we not dropped that philosophy in the 20th Century. 

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 10:41:54 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

Let me ask you if i took my"time machine" and put George Bush back before  WW II do you think he would have a problem with what Roosevelt and Hoover did???? ;)
since you were unable or unwilling to read it the first time let me highlight some key words for you ;)
after reading it do you still think Roosevelt would have a problem with GITMO????
Oh and enjoy the link for far more details about what occured during Roosevelt.


http://www.foitimes.com/internment/Books.htm


I'm not sure what you are saying here.

That FDR was right, or that George Bush was too stupid to learn from the mistakes of one of his predecessors?

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 3/13/2009 10:45:53 AM >

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 10:52:42 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Even more specifically, how many tens or hundreds of thousands of  Asians would die as a result of said pullout?



That is not our responsibility.

Our only concern over when and where we place our troops should be our own national security.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 10:58:55 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

Obama in a year will spend more then 7 years of bushs two wars ;)



And it will be spent on our country, not someone else's.

(in reply to MasterShake69)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 11:16:04 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

How more likely do you get than a boat sitting outside of Cuba aiming it's weapons at us and daring us to make "one wrong move"?

And this...
"Had I been forced to bet I of course would have bet you would have refused- or been unable- to answer the q."
...is a shitty disposition.

boi


If you're referring to the Cuban Missile Crisis, we basically told them that if they didn't get rid of the missiles we would do it for them. Two points and a corollary:
1. Iran is, arguably, run by religious fanatics who want to start a holocaust. That argument could not be made about Cuba or Russia. Iran is more dangerous.
2. I'm all for treating Iran at least as forcibly as we did Cuba.
     A. It's much easier to be forceful before the acquisition of nukes than after.
Thanks for advancing my point.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Afghanistan - 3/13/2009 11:18:42 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Even more specifically, how many tens or hundreds of thousands of  Asians would die as a result of said pullout?



That is not our responsibility.

Our only concern over when and where we place our troops should be our own national security.


It was decided decades ago that our national security was well served by not letting the world situation degrade to the point we did in the late 30s and early 40s.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Afghanistan Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094